⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jul 24th, '07, 22:06 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Aug 11th, '06, 21:20
Posts: 268
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
I have been thinking about my next system (larger of course) and what problems I wan't to not avoid in the future.

My current problem/grievance with the current sytem:
I have 8 half barrels, similar to Joels barrel system, all of which are filled at the same time from the 1 pump. Now to get these to fill at a rate that was even remotely similar to each other I had to put valves on each of the water inlets for the beds and then make sure that the timer on the pump goes for long enough to fill the slowest one. Water doesn't seem to distribute itself evenly through multiple T junctions... In addition I had to make sure that the overflow for each bed had to allow more water out than what could be pumped in, thus not having any overflowing GB's.

All of this took time, changes to design, fish losses etc that don't need to be repeated on the second attempt. All is working well at the moment and everything is in balance, so I don't want to change anything on the current system.

So my thoughts are:
1. Only have 1 grow bed but make it a big sucker. I was thinking in the order of 10m long by 1.5m wide with access down both sides. This way there is only 1 LARGE drain and one bed to fill. This would completely avoid any of the above problems mentioned. However making a bed this size would be quite difficult and would not really be able to be moved once built. It would also require large amounts of support as it would hold over 4,500L of gravel/expanded clay balls. (shudder at the thought of gravel washing) I do have some good ideas on how such a bed could be made quite cheaply with roofing iron and sealant - so that isn't such a problem.
Alternativley
2. I could continue to have multiple (but larger) grow beds all plumbed as if they were one. What I mean is they could have pipes connecting each other horizontally, so that if one fills up faster than the other is would level itself out with the others possibly? I am thinking something like the size of Joels lovely GB's all lined up one after the other.

They could all have seperate water in pipes and possibly all have water out pipes or perhaps could have just one water out pipe from one of the beds?

Could this work? Do I need to draw a picture?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 24th, '07, 22:42 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:07
Posts: 8293
Location: margaret river West Oz
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
Fizzy a balance pipe/tube/conduit.
The only issue I see, is that should the balance pipe be dislodged,
obviously all the water will be lost, and the pump would continue.
( which happened to a friends rainwater tanks 2 X 20k Gal.)
I would think the passive nature would ensure the water levels evenout.
though you would end up with a large dump of water and a reduced minimum level if all are in sync.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 02:08 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend

Joined: Dec 5th, '06, 02:25
Posts: 387
Location: North Carolina
Gender: Male
Other options:
1- Several medium GBs with multiple pumps, That way you only have to balance 2-4 GBs, and can have the "pods" of GBs staggered to keep from having all your fish in little water.
2- As you said with multiple GBs, but take slotted corrugated pipe, cut it in half, and run it down each side of your GB. Balance your drains on one side, balance your inputs on the other side. That way, the beds act as a single bed, but would tend to have flow running across the beds from the input pipes (all ganged together) to the drain pipes (all ganged together).

I would tend towards option 1 above, since that way you have some modularity in the event of trouble. You would also keep your fish in more water.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 04:50 
Spam Assassin (Be afraid!)
Spam Assassin     (Be afraid!)
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 11:50
Posts: 10202
Location: Townsville
Gender: Female
Location: home
another thing to consider,
when you have large/huge grow beds it takes a long time to drain them. The big grow bed 3500L and the medium bed 2000L drain into 63mm pipe, back to the sump. It takes more than an hour for them to drain.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 07:26 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: May 20th, '07, 20:48
Posts: 442
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a metal machine!
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Making one big growbed or connecting several smaller ones together doesn't seem very different to me (as long as the pipes connecting the growbeds are big enough).

I take it this is going to be flood and drain? Will you use an autosyphon? Because if you are, then it could be difficult; EllKayBee's findings mean that any growbed with an area over 3 square meters won't work, because the minimum inflow for the autoshypon to kick in is always above the maximum water out of the inner tube.. This problem can be overcome by using a good U bend water slot at the outlet, but it might not be enough for such a big GB.

To drain such a 4500L GB in about 10 minutes, you'd probably need a 75mm INNER tube (giving you about 21.000L/h theoretical max out) and a 120mm outer tube, and for a nice 2:1 ratio you'd need about 7000L/h pumped into the GB!

Bloody hell, I'd love to see such a monster autosyphon kick in!
*drools


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 09:06 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
I tend to agree with Jaymie, as you get bigger , you're going to run into issues with draining as it takes time for the water to flow through the gravel.. You could try a distibution box like I have on the barrel system, it's been working well for a long time now, distributing the water evenly to 8 different barrels at the same time...

I don;t think a siphon would work to drain a bed that big as the water won;t be able to drain through the gravel to the siphon quick enough..


Attachments:
File comment: Distributor bucket without the risers screwed in...
IMG_1687 (Medium).jpg
IMG_1687 (Medium).jpg [ 45.7 KiB | Viewed 3377 times ]
Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 09:23 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:23
Posts: 936
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Location: South Australia
You have some good suggestions already, but to get good equal pressure and flows of air to multiple outlets (eg air stones) You use a closed loop of pipe connecting to the air pump, and then run everything off this loop. I know water is very different in basically every way, but it might work the same as air.....


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 09:31 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sep 27th, '06, 13:58
Posts: 360
Location: Bali Indonesia
Gender: Male
I can tell that my experience of hooking my growbeds together for about levelling did not work well. For some reason the auto siphon would stop. It probably had do to with my levelling pipe being near the bottom. It mike work if the pipe was say halfway up.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 25th, '07, 12:02 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Aug 11th, '06, 21:20
Posts: 268
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Good suggestions guys.
Was not planning on autosyphon. It was going to be flood and drain.
It is good to hear some of the issues with going big.

I like the idea of the distribution box for my current system, that would have worked well.

Would it work as well on the systems you have recently put up joel? how do you manage the levels of each bed ? Will go and check the system thread to see if there is anything.

I don't like the thought of a leaky cross member losing all my water.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jul 26th, '07, 09:34 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Oct 6th, '06, 08:54
Posts: 29
Location: Sunshine Coast
Gender: Male
Fizzy, One large grow bed sounds good to me. You could have 2 or 3 drains but all going into the one pipe that heads down to a flout above the fish tank. One pump in the tank on continually might work or you could go for a sump and fish tank above the grow bed if you wanted the fish tank to have a constant water level.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.050s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]