⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jul 10th, '15, 23:35 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Sep 20th, '11, 04:27
Posts: 50
Location: Colorado
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: United States, Colorado
I'm starting into the initial construction and from researching further I'm debating my originally planned pump / index valve setup.

I'm going to be using a Flood and Drain setup using 3 IBC totes. My original thought was connecting all 3 tote FT's in serial to ensure a large enough water supply, a single external pump (ease of maintenance), and an indexing valve to flood one GB for 20 minutes at a time, then index to the next bed for 20 min, etc.

But knowing that pumps are happiest not stopping/starting over and over, I was thinking a 24/7 runtime on the pump necessitating an automated 'trigger' for the index valve that didn't require stopping / starting the pump (like this: http://www.aquaponiclynx.com/automated- ... th-control)

But as I start adding up costs and seeing the complexity potentially rising, am I better off with a separate pump for each FT and a simple / dumb timer that triggers the pump for 20 min each hour? I am concerned about costs, but equally about limited / ease of maintenance.

Experiences appreciated!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jul 10th, '15, 23:52 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: May 17th, '14, 07:21
Posts: 180
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Why not use auto siphons? They are cheap to make and completely reliable when tuned. You can bury one IBC as a sump and use a standard chift pist design.

Sequencing valves are expensive and prone to failure if you don't filter solids upstream.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 11th, '15, 00:13 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 26th, '10, 07:17
Posts: 9104
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Oregon, USA
Auto siphons would run the tanks down lower so might not be the best option. You could do a mix or auto siphons and Constant Flood or just Constant Flood and forget about the fluctuation issue. Using CF there would only be the fluctuation due to evaporation and transpiration of water. The pump would run 24/7 and you could have a smaller sump or tank without the fluctuations. You could also add grow beds without changing the sump size because each grow bed would hold the water it contains if the power fails (although at some point you'd probably need to due to pipes or other reasons). Have a look at the BYAP trials thread where growth in Timed Flood and Drain, Siphons and Constant Flood systems are compared for a year http://www.backyardaquaponics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8621.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 11th, '15, 00:36 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Sep 20th, '11, 04:27
Posts: 50
Location: Colorado
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: United States, Colorado
I like the simplicity of the F&D, and had read about the results of the linked trials which reinforced that choice. I'm comfortable with a F&D setup, and would prefer pumps over auto siphons given I have less reservations about continuing operation if I'm not around for a day or two.

That being said, any thoughts have regarding the question on a single pump w/ automated index valve vs a pump per FT w/ a dumb timer would be appreciated.

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 11th, '15, 12:28 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 26th, '10, 07:17
Posts: 9104
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Oregon, USA
I'd look at the electrical costs over time and you probably should consider redundancy as an advantage even if one system failed the others might still continue (depending on what fails of course). If the separate pumps are all on separate AP systems then you have a quarantine system if you need it. You can still separate the fish by size or take one system down for cleaning if you want. It will cost you in plumbing, hard to say how much compared to the index valve setup.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.028s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]