⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Oct 7th, '14, 06:21 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Yes you have to read the whole study in particular the methods.

Manure is regularly applied to lettuce and other leafy crops in some organic operations when small but not before harvest.

Seriously though the levels of E. coli contamination on so many household and public surfaces is huge compared to "wild" situations the counts are seriously high.

Don't get me started on chopping boards and dish cloths :upset:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Oct 7th, '14, 06:31 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Jul 2nd, '14, 14:59
Posts: 1848
Images: 0
Location: Peakhurst - Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Thought I WAS
Location: Sydney
PS.. what I find annoying is that folk can take this study and extrapolate out to all flights of situations..

Please take no offense.. but

I would seriously love to see a finding suggesting that eColi can actually absorb into the plant.. via the roots
until I see that proof, then the watering of lettuce does not count..

As the bride said .... Derrrrr .. who would be so stupid as to water a lettuce with contaminated water..
..
.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 7th, '14, 06:33 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
BuiDoi wrote:
until I see that proof,

No such things as proof in science.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 04:01 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Jul 2nd, '14, 14:59
Posts: 1848
Images: 0
Location: Peakhurst - Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Thought I WAS
Location: Sydney
Stuart Chignell wrote:
No such things as proof in science.

..
And literally saying, eating sh1t can be dangerous, is neither science nor remarkable... just bloody obvious...
That paper was NOT science... pure justification for someone's job... a *sigh*!...... "Publish or Perish junk"

If slugs can be found in lettuce, then imangine the contamination from sewer water..

And then there is the other side of the story, where that Asian Farmer waters over his produce with humonia and customers don't die...
NO.... I don't want to even touch that produce .... YUCK..!

It's a bit like this Ebola stuff, scaring the world... demanding attention... and yet ENTEROVIRUS D-68 killed five and paralyzed 10 in the USA and the authorities don't even talk about it.
Mind you, they are saying that Ebola has gone Airborne ... :twisted: yes .. a bit OT..
..
.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 12:46 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Oct 4th, '14, 15:54
Posts: 17
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Indonesia, Java
OKAY OKAY, it's starting to get hot and off topic in here...
this is a forum, not a debate, I remind you.

Sir Stuart and Sir BuiDoi, you two may continue in your own time please

we're just here to discuss if other animals' contribution would be applicable, and we found out its not. so that's that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 18:54 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
RayMondo wrote:
OKAY OKAY, it's starting to get hot and off topic in here...
this is a forum, not a debate, I remind you.

Sir Stuart and Sir BuiDoi, you two may continue in your own time please

we're just here to discuss if other animals' contribution would be applicable, and we found out its not. so that's that.

:laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3: :laughing3:

Oh you are so new to this forum.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 19:03 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
BuiDoi wrote:
And literally saying, eating sh1t can be dangerous, is neither science nor remarkable... just bloody obvious...

I'd disagree with that. One of the great things about good science is that asumptions are tested. Scientists often cop a lot of stihck for investigating things they should have known because they were "obvious" but every now and then they find something that is completely counter intuitive. Something that goes against all our common sense and is absolutely surprising that we wouldn't have known if it hadn't been tested.

The research in question may not have been well concieved but saying that it was crap science because the conclusion was obvious is not a valid criticism.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 20:20 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Oct 4th, '14, 15:54
Posts: 17
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Indonesia, Java
Stuart Chignell wrote:
Oh you are so new to this forum.


I am~


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 8th, '14, 21:16 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Apr 15th, '14, 09:31
Posts: 87
Location: Mae Taeng, Chiang Mai
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: Indeed
Location: Thailand
One of the best aspects of science has always been its readiness to admit when it got something wrong. Theories are constantly being refigured, and new research frequently renders old ideas outdated or incomplete.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 9th, '14, 04:26 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Backhoe wrote:
One of the best aspects of science has always been its readiness to admit when it got something wrong. Theories are constantly being refigured, and new research frequently renders old ideas outdated or incomplete.


Are you kidding me? :upset:

Scientists are just people and they hate admitting they are wrong just like everyone else. Science history is littered with examples where new evidence contradicted current theory. It is a regular occurrence in scientific circles that people who provide contradictory evidence are pilloried mercilessly. Presenting a paper that contradicts the work of others is not for the faint hearted.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 9th, '14, 04:30 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
RayMondo wrote:
Stuart Chignell wrote:
Oh you are so new to this forum.


I am~

Welcome to the forum.

We are a crazy bunch and one of the things we are not good at as a community is keeping threads organised and on topic. It drives me nuts sometimes but then sometimes I do it myself :oops: Mind you I do try and let others derail a thread before I push it into the next state :twisted:

On the big plus side things generally stay good natured with only the occaisional flaring of bad feeling or temper that serves to remind us how amicable things generally are.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 9th, '14, 16:38 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Jul 2nd, '14, 14:59
Posts: 1848
Images: 0
Location: Peakhurst - Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Thought I WAS
Location: Sydney
Stuart Chignell wrote:
........but every now and then they find something that is completely counter intuitive......
The research in question may not have been well concieved but saying that it was crap science because the conclusion was obvious is not a valid criticism.


Well thats where we will have to disagree.. Intuitively, I would think that a pathogen could not be absorbed via the roots to the leaves or fruit of a plant.

The fact that they watered the plants with those pathogenic water proved nothing more that the bleeding obvious, and destroyed the whole outcome..

I still don't know that uptake via the roots is possible ... pouring crap over the top is dumb..
So again, they wasted their time, and our confidence in THIR science..

Quote:
we're just here to discuss if other animals' contribution would be applicable, and we found out its not. so that's that.


That is the problem.. this poor SCIENCE has proved absolutely nothing...
The quest now, is how can you utilize other manures, in a practical way.. As I said, I am using goat poo in the worm farm and using the juice in that AP system..
I would think that you could readily bin the additives, and soak it for a good time, to make a similar tea..
Obviously, don't water over plants, and reading between the lines, if salt is added to the water, then could we expect some sterilisation ....
..
.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.084s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]