⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:13 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 19:46
Posts: 6604
Location: sunbury
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: sunbury
aquamad wrote:
I realise that - I have however pondered on what would constitute AP...
We each have our preferred ways and some have gone way out of their way to prove a point (its their time, so let them do it)... for me ap must have water RETURNING to the system from the growbeds... as to how much should return, that I have not fixed down yet

i am with you on all those


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:15 
Think that's the crux of the discussion Stuart....

Without the fish tanks that's just commonly known "run to waste"....

Add the fish tanks... and it's still "run to waste"....

But is it AP????


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:18 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 14th, '06, 19:03
Posts: 5413
Location: Cairns Queensland
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Cairns, Queensland
Quote:
But is it AP????

It has 'aspects of AP', but is not truely AP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:37 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:07
Posts: 8293
Location: margaret river West Oz
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
How about.. Here some of us practice 'almost closed' loop AP growing.
Having to add water and power, recycling not reticulating water.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:39 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Aquaculture + Hydroponics + Irrigation = Aquaponics + Irrigation = Intergrated agriculture

I don't think I could be convinced that a "run to use" (not waste) system couldn't be aquaponics. I might be convinced of the philosophical and environmental benfits of a recirculating system depending on the circumstances.

Brings up two questions for me. If you have a source of water that is a bit salty (even if it is only a little bit (like my cousins creek in the Otways)) at some point in a recirculating system won't you have to do a water change?

Natural systems are often flushed seasonally so a system that periodically runs to waste to a greater or lesser degree shouldn't automatically be objectionable.

Second question. I live on a farm that is 111 acres (and some roods). About 80% of it is highly fertile, free draining red volcanic soil. The rest is thick sticky grey clay. Actually its all really thick sticky clay its just that about 80% of it is covered in 2m of the red volcanic soil. In a normal year (ie when it rains, not like the last 12) wherever the red soil finishes and the grey clay is on the surface the chance of a spring being within 50m is about 95%. So we have masses of fertile soil and masses of water (relatively). If I were to convert the farm to AP that would mean that good fertile soil would be covered by Gravel filled grow beds. Surely not a good thing. Wouldn't an Aquculture and hydroponic setup on the crappy clay with water irrigated onto crops on the good soil fit within the general greater philsophy of this forum. Sensible use of the land, water, etc.

I reckon that the best use of resources in some areas would be a totally recirculating system but surely not always?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:47 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:07
Posts: 8293
Location: margaret river West Oz
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
Management and planning go along way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:48 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18th, '06, 09:41
Posts: 9072
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Brisbane
I like the sound of your land Stuart.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:50 
Quote:
Wouldn't an Aquculture and hydroponic setup on the crappy clay with water irrigated onto crops on the good soil fit within the general greater philsophy of this forum. Sensible use of the land, water, etc.


Whether or not it fits the "strict" definitions of what's AP or not....

I'd certainly agree/admire such use of resources.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 8th, '07, 20:53 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Yeah we are pretty pleased with it. F&F and M visited today and I got to show off my water and make excuses over my mess.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 04:36 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 19:46
Posts: 6604
Location: sunbury
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: sunbury
Stuart Chignell wrote:
Yeah we are pretty pleased with it. F&F and M visited today and I got to show off my water and make excuses over my mess.

Yes we visited today there is loads of good water i would like some of the red soil for my dirt garden now the mess [good stuff] it was everywhere[ grouse ] as for him not beeing a tree hugging hippy ive seen the house house building :lol: id say if he dount hug trees he stands next to them


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: To Be or not To Be
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 05:19 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
You have to get awfully close to them to in order to cut them down :twisted:

Some of my friends would be horified at the thoughts I now have as I walk through a forest. That'd make an excellent set of beams, bectha that would have a beutiful grain, how would I get a truck in here to get that log ......


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: To Be or not To Be
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 07:42 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Jun 19th, '06, 17:17
Posts: 695
Location: Bundamba, Queensland
Gender: Male
Hi,

Quote:
I realise that - I have however pondered on what would constitute AP...
We each have our preferred ways and some have gone way out of their way to prove a point (its their time, so let them do it)... for me ap must have water RETURNING to the system from the growbeds... as to how much should return, that I have not fixed down yet


AM......some of us do what we do to bring AP to a wider audience (like those who are pushed for space or those who have physical disabilities or those who are not willing to accept the limitations imposed by narrow thinking) rather than (as you suggest) going out of our way to prove a point.

I do have some water returning to my sole growbed but I'm open-minded enough to concede that there are other ways of looking at things.

In any case, as I noted earlier, Aquaponics is the combination of aquaculture and hydroponics......in all of its forms.

Let's not be frightened of trying new things.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 08:02 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
It is interesting and/or fun to debate the terms, but at the end of the day we can each do whatever the hell we want to do in our own back yards as long as it's legal. I have sometimes taken in advice from the fine forum members and thought - yeah, I could do it that way, but I want to do it my way... The using fish water to grow plants definition is inclusive enough to make everybody happy, probably?

I guess the sticking point in the debate is whether aquponics is (recirculating) aquaculture + _recirculating_ hydroponics. Does everybody agree that the aquaculture is definitely recirculating? You could remove all recirculation out of it like the guy in Scotland with the trout being raised in a side stream of a river, then planting beds, then out in the river again, is that AP?

The definitive thing to do would be to ask the person who coined the term. According to wikipedia's article it is definitely closed loop. If that is the definition then open loop is not AP, it is some other word free for the coining.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaponics


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 09:12 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18th, '06, 09:41
Posts: 9072
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Brisbane
We all know that in the end it doesn't matter. Each to his own and all that.

One reason that this type of debate has gone on frequently here - other than a pure ego thing :lol: - is that people new to aquaponics may:

1. Be taken advantage of by unscrupulous and/or ignorant business people who are selling equipment to be used in ways that are as yet unproven; and/or

2. Mistake an experimental system for one that has been proven to work in the long term and seek to replicate to their own detriment.

One may ask - who cares let them make their mistakes - but that is not what we are about here. This forum is about helping others and mutual learning.

I think it is a great thing for us to experiment using new ways and methods. There is a raft of new things that people are doing very successfully now that have come from individual or collective thought and experimentation out of this forum. What we do need to be mindful of though is making it clear what is an experiment as opposed to what has now been proven to work - so as not to confuse new members. A healthy debate then about the pros and cons of an individuals system can only be a positive thing, provided it is approached in a positive way.

BTW - I’m more than happy for people to critique my system because it will hopefully lead to me implementing improvements.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Apr 9th, '07, 09:26 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Quote:
BTW - I’m more than happy for people to critique my system because it will hopefully lead to me implementing improvements.


OK VB, yours isn't as pretty as LB's is. (seriously thinking about painting my styrofoam now BTW)

One of many reasons I enjoy this forum over other web resources out there is that this one really is a "backyard" AP site, as opposed to the research papers and consulting business things, which are talking more to mass production and economic interests. This forum is great because of the homespun ingenuity and tinkering that is going on, and the fact that anyone could replicate one of our systems if they like them because they are described openly. OK, need more Easter candy/fuel...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.047s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]