⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Jun 11th, '14, 11:21 

Joined: Feb 9th, '12, 00:00
Posts: 7
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Southeast Michigan, USA
System size:
2x 400 gal. fish tanks + around 300 gal. total sump/pump tanks.
100sq ft of media filled beds (plan on adding more to this system)
Its been established for 13 months now. (this is my first system)
Taken some pictures but can't get my old Samsung and my new Windows to play nice tonight.

Have about 60 Tilapia that are a year old, 60 about 5 months. I need to get into a routine of eating a couple every week. If you ask the fish, 2 cups is not enough food !

I've taken out a fair amount of peppers, cukes & toms last fall and through the first part of the winter... So with this and maybe the commercial aquaculture food being reduced in phosphorous got me to where I am?

I'll start with slowly adding some rock phosphate,(per Nate Storey's vids) then maybe over the long run switch out the regular potassium carbonate with the monopotassium phosphate.

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jun 11th, '14, 11:43 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '12, 15:28
Posts: 1601
Location: At my desk
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Coolbellup
Thats amazing that with that feed rate there were almost no phosphorous, shows that the toms and cuc's must have been sucking down hard on the stuff!

I have about 50 sq ft of Growing area in the BYAP systems and have been feeding 40g per day, so little wonder I've experienced nutrient deficiency when heavily planted with fruiting plants.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 11th, '14, 11:55 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Makes sense Matty


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 11th, '14, 16:17 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '12, 15:28
Posts: 1601
Location: At my desk
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Coolbellup
Heres the environmental data for Spectra FF for trout:

Environmental Impact
Estimated discharge (kg) per 1,000 kg fish produced
Nitrogen (N) FCR = 1.2 FCR = 1.5
Dissolved Waste 47.8 67.2
Solid Waste 8.6 10.8
Total Waste 56.4 78.0
Phosphorus (P) FCR = 1.2 FCR = 1.5
Dissolved Waste 3.6 5.5
Solid Waste 4.1 5.1
Total Waste 7.7 10.7

So for an FCR of 1.2, there is 3.6kg soluble phosphorous for every 1000kg of fish produced. Thats 0.4% of food produces soluble phosphorous roughly speaking, with a bit more in solid waste form - total of about 0.9% phosphorous produced from food. The FF food content of phosphorous is quoted as 0.9% so the fish don't use any.

I originally contacted them to get potassium figures, though they were not forthcoming with that. For Nitrogen the figure is nearly 7% total waste with 6% of it being soluble.

So thats giving a soluble NP ratio of 6:0.4 or 15:1 which seems very high on the nitrogen side seeing as most hydro formulas are around 1:1 or 1:2.

And the K bit at the end is often higher, though is also deficient in fish food!
So I would love to hear what other peoples systems test for for P (and K). Would love to get a lowish cost way of measuring K...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 11th, '14, 16:20 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '12, 15:28
Posts: 1601
Location: At my desk
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Coolbellup
Another thing of interest is when you look at the ratio of solid waste for N:P its 2:1 - a better ratio, I think this goes some way to explaining why mature systems perform better since once the mineralisation kicks in, it starts getting into all that solid phosphorous and potassium that has been stored up in the grow beds - maybe its possible to run the system intensively for 8 months on trout poo then just let it coast the rest of the year on solids with a little bit of supplementation?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 12th, '14, 08:48 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Ive read of systems going without fish for some time but every system/situation would be different. Unfortunately when its time to harvest trout -its time to start planting out heavy feeders like tomato's and peppers etc which would consume stocks quickly.

Whilst I was googling around yesterday I came across a statment indication that by the time plants have attained about 25 per cent of their total dry weight, they may have accumulated as much as 75 per cent of their total phosphorus requirements.

We know how PH effects Phosphorus but this little snippet I found this morning was also interesting..
Quote:
Some soil P is contained in soil micro-organisms. A proportion of inorganic P may be “biologically fixed” by micro-organisms when soil P levels are low. In some cases, micro-organisms may even compete with plants for P when soil P levels are low.

Phosphorus is temporarily tied up in the organic components of micro-organisms; however, this P is eventually returned to the soil when microbes die and break down. After mineralization (conversion from organic P to inorganic P), soil P can be taken up by plants.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 12th, '14, 09:00 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '12, 15:28
Posts: 1601
Location: At my desk
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Coolbellup
Interesting Charlie, I'm not a full bottle on pH effects on phosphorous. What's the storey with P and pH in aquaponics?

Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 12th, '14, 09:23 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
I was refering to availability to plants at different pH ranges and the effects on other elements. For example, some P forms are absorbed more readily than other forms. Generally P is slightly more available in a pH range of 6.0 to 7.5 pH.

At higher pH levels (>7.5), calcium may react with phosphorus, creating forms that have slightly lower availability to plants. Magnesium acts in the same manner, forming different types of magnesium phosphate compounds.

In more acidic environments (pH <6.0), iron and aluminum increase, which causes either a fixing or removing of P from the solution which limits the availabilty of inorganic P to plants.

A large percentage of new systems run higher pH values which when you look at P availability in alkaline environments, you can only assume a level of deficiency is occuring, to what level we dont know. So that goes in hand with your previous comments in a way. I dont think the acidic example is a problem because we all need to keep pH values above 6.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.073s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]