⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 07:00 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Jul 29th, '13, 07:58
Posts: 3382
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: West Florida, USA
Would it make sense to add a new IBC above ground...making it the highest point in the system and then use the current pump (45 gpm Aquascpae) in my sump to go to this tank? My reasoning is, I could then use gravity to feed both the FT and also a RFF for my DWF beds(and possibly additional DWF beds). Currently, my 250 gal sump pumps out to GB's, towers, and FT, and I'm running low on pressure to expand due to having to use pump to run whole sysytem. Thinking this might work, but don't know hydraulic loss and if it's feasible. Rupert, Charlie, Ryan??? Anyone think I could do this? Or more precisely, will it work? :support:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 18:04 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Jun 22nd, '11, 17:01
Posts: 527
Gender: Male
Location: Central West NSW
How high are we talking?

Before you goto all the effort, might be worth running the pump whilst holding a test hose connected up to the planned height to see what sort of pressure you get up there?

I'd try keep all inlet pipework as large as possible to reduce further losses


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 18:53 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Jul 29th, '13, 07:58
Posts: 3382
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: West Florida, USA
The current sump is about 9' lower then the top of the towers. The pump will pump to a 10'head, but the other issue is I'm using the pump to feed all GB's, the FT,and the towers. If I can get the proposed higher tank to gravity feed the GB's, as well as the FT, then the pump would have plenty left for my towers and DWC, and possibly future DWC expansion! It's working the way it is, but is about maxed out.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 19:43 
Use a separate pump for the towers... :wink:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 20:07 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Jul 29th, '13, 07:58
Posts: 3382
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: West Florida, USA
Thought about that Rupert. Trying to keep the 1 pump philosophy...but it would be pretty easy to drop a small sub in the Ft to do the towers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 20:11 
I'd keep the towers separate... you may find you might benefit from being able to manipulate the water delivery by a timed pump....

Depending on media... and temperature...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 23rd, '13, 22:07 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
+1 separate pump for the towers IMO


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.088s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]