To me, there is a connection across all these various and nefarious 'theories' about how we are being treated by those who are supposed to be serving the People. For example, the fear game they play - it used to be the USSR or the Yellow Peril, but now they have a self-perpetuating fear game called 'The War On Terror' or TWOT. Not only is it a war they can never win, it creates many more new 'terrorists' every time a bomb is dropped or a bullet fired or even a sanction is applied.
But TWOT has several purposes, or rather fear does. Fear makes us predictable by turning us into black & white thinkers. The 'you are either with us or against us' sounds rational if you are scared but in a more calm environment it can be seen for the BS it really is.
But that same fight or flight also shuts down the viscera; (the organs and systems making us healthy and producing energy etc) it makes no sense to be wasting body resources digesting the sandwich you just had when the lion is leaping at you. All resources go to the fight/flight reflex and the more positive areas of the body go without until the danger is past.
And with TWOT, the danger is never past - it can be ramped up as soon as a politician wants to distract us from the new gifts he is about to give the banks, or to goad us into a course of action.
And chief among the positive aspects of the viscera, is the immune system. So, by promoting Swine flu as an epidemic, they can actually make it MORE likely people will get sick, because the fear spread by the MSM (MainStream Media) will reduce the immune response because of increased stress.
Add in the decrease in the value of foods once touted as healthy, because of over-cropping and the rather naive view we can strip out all the nutrients from soil and just replace the ones WE think are important and we have reduced capacity by the body to respond to stress.
Add in still more - the increase of chemicals in our foods has mostly unknown effects - instead of requiring an additive has a positive and proven effect on us before it is allowed into foods, we simply require the manufacturer to provide evidence that they tested it and found no or minor harm. Why anyone would think it sane to let the profit-seekers test their own goods is beyond me, but that's the system now. Monsanto, as an example, has even been made immune to prosecution if things go wrong, so Indian farmers are unable to get compensation for their losses.
Big Pharma has no interest in cures, not only because of their profit-taking at the expense of human lives, but because cures would reduce the stress felt by the general population. That is why the discoveries of cancer cures are suppressed and the people involved vilified. Cancer is a wonderful tool for them - apparently random in where and when it strikes, usually so delayed in appearance the corporate poisons can't be directly identified as connected, it is a great source of stress for almost everyone.
Across the board of almost every conspiracy theory I have heard there is an underlying connection - profit. Sitting like obese spiders in the centre of their webs we have the 0.01%, the ultra rich, making decisions with OUR lives that lead only to them getting more and more power and money.
Long derided as Conspiracy nonsense, the idea that the 0.1% or even more, the 0.01% might control the world has been given a factual base. New Scientist published research showing how the lines of control of the TransNational Corporations (TNC's) lead to a very small group of controllers.
From Orbis 2007, a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide, they pulled out all 43,060 TNCs and the share ownerships linking them. Then they constructed a model of which companies controlled others through shareholding networks, coupled with each company's operating revenues, to map the structure of economic power.

The red dots are the 147 super-controllers out of the 1300 or so that have interlocking ownership across the 43,000 TNC's.
To my view, while we sit and look at all the things going on as single events, we miss the big picture, which can be seen as, this world is NOT being run for our benefit nor are almost any of the 'news' stories we are fed even attempting to be true. Only by looking for the common connections between the various issues and problems we are having will we be able to see who is doing what to us.
And to be honest, it doesn't take a lot of looking before you begin to see family names recurring in different areas.
It also helps to have a healthy suspicion of the real meaning behind things promoted as good for us. For example, FOI legislation around the world was touted as Govts being accountable, but the truth is radically different. Govts NEVER had the right to withhold information from citizens; FOI enshrined into law that right. We could have taken any Govt to court (in so-called democracies anyway) and the law would have forced the Govt to show us the information. Now they have the right to withhold anything they feel like for 30 years, or longer if they decide to, and FOI requests are rarely met without heavy redaction of the content.
Promoting a pretty innocuous flu as a major threat to health might seem a strange thing to do, even with the view of it increasing our predictability or concealing a more dastardly activity, but add in Rumsfled's connection to multi-millions of doses of Tamiflu on the verge of going past their use-by date and we see a direct link to the profit-taking activity.
So, in my view, 9/11 IS relevant to the discussion of alternative cures and processes we might find here; it is one of the symptoms of a sick bunch of people who care not in the slightest for your or my health and who will kill or sacrifice anyone on the altar of their greed.
'nuff said...