Rupert, thank you for your insightful response.
RupertofOZ wrote:
Most people would probably be using shell grit... crushed shells... rather than oyster shells....
I would think that would be a matter of location. All the feed stores here carry oyster shell grit at $US 0.20/lb. I've never seen a local source, retail or otherwise, for a shell grit that wasn't oyster shell. We are located in the mid-Atlantic area of the US and this is a commercial oyster fishery.
RupertofOZ wrote:
And no... a commercial operation wouldn't bother trying to control pH buffering with bags of shells
Would a different product be used or would it be the same product with a different delivery method or constitution?
RupertofOZ wrote:
Fish respire ammonia.. not CO2... and the acidity disassociates the Calcium and Carbonate... which reassociate/disassociate into various other forms... but not into Calcium Chloride...
I'm not an argumentative sort, but I believe that fish do respire CO2 in addition to excreting Ammonia from their gills. In fact, the aquaculture course at the University of Arizona teaches that for every gram of O2 that a fish consumes, 1.38 g of CO2 is produced. They also have a formula to calculate total CO2 produced daily as a result of respiration, combined with biomass, feed rate and DO:
(see
http://ag.arizona.edu/azaqua/ista/ISTA7 ... Design.ppt)
RupertofOZ wrote:
.... other forms of more immediate, and controllable pH buffering would be applied...
That's what I guess I'm trying to get my head around. What do you suggest as being the solution in a commercial environment?
I realize there has been some argument as to what a commercial system is. I like the concept of looking at a 4 tank DWC system as a node and deal with them independently. It should matter not if you have one node of 20. For argument's sake, let's assume 4-1,500 gal tanks and 16,000 gal of DWC trough for a total of 24,000 gal US.
Again, thank you for your response.