⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 14:51 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 8th, '10, 12:22
Posts: 528
Images: 3
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Montarra, South Australia
docscience wrote:
My design will work with any water flow and is designed to be able to start with a much smaller water flow.
This design addition that another person has figured out, will stop a siphon almost instantly no mater what the water flow is.


Kewl - build away and i love to be corrected :)

If it works, i'll be happy to swap one of my systems over and trial it for some time

In the words of a Star Trek captain - "make it so"


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 14:52 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Feb 1st, '13, 21:34
Posts: 268
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yesterday
Location: NS,Canada
Charlie

That is due to the design of the pond pump, being less efficient at lower volumes.
It is one of those laws of physics.

The actual energy needed to raise water through height is directly proportional to the height the water is being raised.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 14:52 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 8th, '10, 12:22
Posts: 528
Images: 3
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Montarra, South Australia
Charlie wrote:
FYI....Its been proven that a pond pump has less current draw at higher loads. :thumbleft:


Something i certainly want to test over a 7 day period myself. Sounds legit though ;)


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 14:57 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Feb 1st, '13, 21:34
Posts: 268
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yesterday
Location: NS,Canada
earthbound

This is something like writing a thesis, and having to defend it when I have not tested out an actual working device. I sure hope it works.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 15:03 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
Siphons at the best of times are unpredictable bloody things. Build it, test it, talk it up.... :thumbright:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 15:03 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 8th, '10, 12:22
Posts: 528
Images: 3
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Montarra, South Australia
docscience wrote:
earthbound

This is something like writing a thesis, and having to defend it when I have not tested out an actual working device. I sure hope it works.


So do we or you know what will happen - :bootyshake:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 15:04 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Erich wrote:
Charlie wrote:
FYI....Its been proven that a pond pump has less current draw at higher loads.


Something i certainly want to test over a 7 day period myself. Sounds legit though


There is a debate aboutt it where SV and Werdna make me look like a real goose because I didnt believe it was possible lol

The discussion is within another thread so you have to wade through a discussion on eductors as well but its worth a look if you want to laugh at my dumbness :D

Starts about here...
viewtopic.php?p=343380#p343380


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 15:09 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 8th, '10, 12:22
Posts: 528
Images: 3
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Montarra, South Australia
Cheers Charlie

I gather the pump works less as its pumping not so hard, therefore the wattage (and power consumption) is not as great as a higher level


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 16:36 
docscience wrote:
The main purpose of this siphon design, is so that the water surface of the FT can be put as close to the bottom of the GB as possible. This is to reduce energy cost of pumping the water back up to the grow bed. Water pumping cost is directly related to how high the water must be pumped.


docscience wrote:
I agree that is why many people can not get their siphon working, because they do not have a high enough flow rate.
That is why I put what amounts to a small 1/2 inch tube which works like a mini-siphon to start the larger siphon.
With a slow flow rate in some siphons, the u trap in the bottom keeps the air from re-entering from the bottom.
The u trap also makes it harder for the air to get down and out of the siphon to create the vacuum.
I use the 1/2 inch tube which can remove the air easier to create the siphon..


If you want the siphon discharge to be as close to the fish tank surface... and your grow beds are higher than your fish tank....

Then why even have a "U bend" trap at all....

If you have to use a siphon.. then an Affnan siphon... and a ball valve to adjust the flow... should work without any problems.. and certainly without the need for a "U bend".... :dontknow:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 17:05 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Feb 1st, '13, 21:34
Posts: 268
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yesterday
Location: NS,Canada
RupertofOZ

I have a question which would be good for me to know.
What is the shortest distance between the GB floor, and the output tube of the Affnan siphon, that is commonly used ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 17:07 
I'll leave that to the siphon "gurus" Doc.... I've never run siphons... other than loop siphons... :lol:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 17:15 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Feb 1st, '13, 21:34
Posts: 268
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yesterday
Location: NS,Canada
I can not comment on these Affnan siphon and loop siphons since I have not spent much time reading about them.
It is something I should be doing, as there may be very good ideas that I can use.

How dependent are loop siphons on a particular flow rate to start ?
Can they start letting fluid through at a low flow rate and not officially start ?

How dependent are loop siphons on a particular flow rate for cutting out ?
What flow rates would have them continue operating and not shut down properly when the bed is nearly drained ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 17:27 
Loop siphons are easy to adjust to get the start/stop right... you know when it's not because the flood level in your grow bed... just keeps getting higher... :D

(assumed ball valve control on grow bed delivery line)

Adjusting the height of the flood itself.. is simply a matter of raising, or lowering the loop...


Last edited by RupertofOZ on Mar 1st, '13, 17:47, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mar 1st, '13, 17:34 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Feb 1st, '13, 21:34
Posts: 268
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yesterday
Location: NS,Canada
Thankyou

Are there any comments on the loop siphon stopping that you can mention at the moment ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.069s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]