⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 17th, '13, 15:59 
RupertofOZ wrote:
I've actually read probably just as many posts about pumps not starting.. when they've been turning off.. then back on... in siphoned systems.. including those of a most avid siphonator....

(Actually had me wondering if the u-beaut pumps he advocates... were actually that u-beaut... after all... )


scotty435 wrote:
You missed the point


As it seems have you.... and that's the point... even continuously pumped systems... can result in pump failure....

And the "u-beaut" pumps... were a reference to someone else... :wink:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jan 17th, '13, 16:01 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25th, '12, 11:52
Posts: 578
Gender: Female
Are you human?: when caffeinated
Location: Battle Ground, Washington, USA
I remember from my engineering days that turning things on and off exposes them to repeated surges, which can be hard on the circuitry. It's not a guarantee of shortened life span, but it increases the risk of failure.

It's probably like how one person can smoke a pack a day and live to be ninety, while another person smoking the same amount from the same age gets lung cancer and dies at 50. And a third person who never smoked a single cigarette gets hit by a bus and dies at 25.

I have no idea what I just said, but it felt pretty profound while I was saying it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 17th, '13, 17:07 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 26th, '10, 07:17
Posts: 9104
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Oregon, USA
RupertofOZ wrote:
RupertofOZ wrote:
I've actually read probably just as many posts about pumps not starting.. when they've been turning off.. then back on... in siphoned systems.. including those of a most avid siphonator....

(Actually had me wondering if the u-beaut pumps he advocates... were actually that u-beaut... after all... )


scotty435 wrote:
You missed the point


As it seems have you.... and that's the point... even continuously pumped systems... can result in pump failure....

And the "u-beaut" pumps... were a reference to someone else... :wink:



True continuously run pumps can fail. Both the siphon pumps and the ones you mentioned having the capacitors fail, were on systems that weren't being continuously run so even though I get your point you sort of made the case for me.

Thanks for the clarification regarding the quote. Posting it with my quote made it appear you were referring to me which is why I took offense.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 24th, '13, 10:39 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
It's been a week or so since I posted anything here. Just wanted to post some updated pics of some modifications and additions I've made to the setup I'm planning.

To the AP system, I've reconfigured the GB's to be independently filled and drained, rather than piped together in series. This will allow me to selectively make some beds F&D and others CF. I've also added a fourth sump tank under each line, so I'm sure there's plenty of sump reserve, no matter how it operates. I've also moved the GB fill supply lines to the inner walkways so they are more accessible.

I've since added several solar components, borrowing from projects I've got planned for the main house anyway. First, there is the addition of a 3'x24' solar space heater collector along the lower southerly wall of the hoophouse. It's a design which I got from my involvement with the SimplySolar group on Yahoo, of which Gary Reysa from BuildItSolar.com is a contributing member. The collector is made from aluminum downspouts painted black and housed in a wooden frame with insulation and glazing. It is stationary at the optimum angle for the winter sun at my latitude (32 degrees from vertical). It is ducted via 4" pvc and airflow is powered by two 4" inline fans in opposing push/pull configuration. The fans can be controlled by simple snap switches or an Arduino board.

Next, is the addtion of a 8'x24' solar thermal hotwater collection system using CPVC piping for the collector material. The collector mounts are designed to allow adjustment for the optimum tilt angle for the four seasons. Thermal storage is provided by 2 IBC's (red tanks) piped together to form one large 550 gallon heat sink. One red IBC has a heat exchanger coil which is plumbed to the CPVC array to form a closed loop for collecting solar heat energy. The 2nd IBC has another heat exchanger coil that is used to heat water to supply a utility sink in the hoophouse. The water supply comes from the remaining two IBC's (blue tanks) under the fishtanks. It is filtered, purified, and pressurized before being split off to hot/cold supply manifolds. The sink and water system will enable outside cleaning of fish and veggies and topping up the AP system as needed, all using rainwater supply and solar power. The solar space heater will heat the greenhouse during the day and the thermal storage tanks will heat it overnite. I also have the possibility of running PEX tubing through the concrete pad to heat the floor using solar, so there are many options available.

There will be five water pumps to run, as well as fish tank aerators and a couple of fans. So, I put in a service panel and a 4 kW PV solar array using Enphase microinverters. This collection of projects, combined with a battery bank array for overnight power, would really make our AP hoophouse completely self-sufficient and off-grid. The large PV solar array is one that I found on the 3D warehouse. However, it's pretty close to what I would build, especially since it uses the Enphase microinverter technology which I really favor. I'm not sure I'd need an array that large just to support the AP, but our home is all-electric, so any overage produced would certainly not go to waste.

I can only post screen pics, as the 3D model is now too large to upload to the warehouse... :lol:


Attachments:
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5c.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5c.jpg [ 48.46 KiB | Viewed 1318 times ]
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5b.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5b.jpg [ 60.8 KiB | Viewed 1318 times ]
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5a.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5a.jpg [ 51.18 KiB | Viewed 1318 times ]


Last edited by MrPisky on Jan 24th, '13, 10:52, edited 3 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 24th, '13, 10:40 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
Last two pics:


Attachments:
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5e.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5e.jpg [ 51.04 KiB | Viewed 1318 times ]
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5d.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5d.jpg [ 65.1 KiB | Viewed 1318 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 24th, '13, 11:23 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 28th, '11, 10:22
Posts: 53
Gender: Male
Are you human?: only after coffee
Location: N. Texas
:thumbright: SWEET!

I also see the addition of a utility sink.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 24th, '13, 11:57 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25th, '12, 11:52
Posts: 578
Gender: Female
Are you human?: when caffeinated
Location: Battle Ground, Washington, USA
I'm beginning to get the impression you don't do *anything* "just a little bit." ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 24th, '13, 12:24 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Mar 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 5404
Location: South Australia
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yep
Location: South Australia
If the solar collector can be moved away from the grow house a bit you will collect more heat. The collector is shading the grow house and even though it's not shading the plants, there will be less heat collected over the entire system. '

If it gets really cold where you are, it might also be worth painting some sections of the grow house black eg where the collector shades the grow house. It might pay to paint black the other side as well.

Grow beds will act as heat exchangers so heat in the grow house equals heat in the water.

Also, just a thought on angles. The coldest part of winter might not be the middle of winter, so there might be some value in setting the angle to suit the coldest part. I'm not sure if that's true, it just fell out of my head.


Is that collector glass covered?

I did some experiments with solar collectors, and was a bit surprised to find there wasn't any need to lay pipe over the entire surface. A single pipe at the top running passively as a thermo siphon was enough to suck all the heat from the collector. This only works with a glass lidded collector. If there is no glass, and the pipe is the collector, obviously the more pipe the better.

Apparently, the ground only a few feet down stays at the average yearly temperature for your area. There might be some heat to collect by [burying] some pipes and running a fan to circulate air. I know nothing of this method other than people do it. I think you can also store heat by running air through during the day and then recover it at night.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '13, 00:27 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
MikeyLIkesIt wrote:
:thumbright: SWEET!

I also see the addition of a utility sink.


Yep, thanks for the suggestion!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '13, 01:10 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
Geek2Nurse wrote:
I'm beginning to get the impression you don't do *anything* "just a little bit." ;)


Go big or go home, right? :lol:

Well, I think sometimes my aspirations are much larger than my resources, but you always have to aim a bit higher than your intended target. I've been trying to prepare my family for hard times without obsessing about it negatively. My goal is for our family and home to become as self-sufficient as possible. I just try to come up with the prospective plans and leave the resources and final outcomes to God. 8)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '13, 04:08 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
BullwinkleII wrote:
If the solar collector can be moved away from the grow house a bit you will collect more heat. The collector is shading the grow house and even though it's not shading the plants, there will be less heat collected over the entire system.
I don't have that much room to play with near the hoophouse. Second, if what you are saying is true, then it seems it would make the concept of having a solar heat collector no different than simply having a window of equal size. I think any potential heat loss from sun infiltration on that section of the greenhouse is compensated by having the greenhouse air being forcibly recirculated through 8 lengths of 24' black downspout material. The size of the collector's surface area is a function of the amount of airflow needed to collect "X" amount of heat and is regulated by the CFM of airflow you put through the collector. The size I chose is not yet adjusted for any heat calculations and is only meant to give a visual representation of a possible unit. The "cold" air is blown into the lower section of the right side plenum. In the first pass, air moves through the lower four tubes, collecting heat on the way to the plenum on the left. Airflow then transfers to the upper four tubes for a second heat collection pass on the return trip back to the upper plenum on the right where it is blown into the greenhouse. Here's a closeup of the space heater collector: (the light blue insulation should also be painted black, I was just excited that I was able to recreate the actual Dow Super-Tuff R look...lol)
Attachment:
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5g.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5g.jpg [ 69.53 KiB | Viewed 1303 times ]


If it gets really cold where you are, it might also be worth painting some sections of the grow house black eg where the collector shades the grow house. It might pay to paint black the other side as well.
Painting surfaces inside the growhouse black might tend to work against me in the strong heat of the summer months. The greenhouse runs lengthwise almost exactly east/west and the summer sun angle at our latitude hits a maximum of 78 degree from vertical. So, the other side of the house will see no direct sunlight and would be blocked by trees anyway. We're in the southeastern USA with very long growing seasons anyway, but the hoophouse will make it totally year-round, just like JT's setup. Our winters are usually fairly mild with temps rarely geting into single digit (F) ranges. We have not had any snow this winter so far, none last year, and just a couple of days near freezing temps. Some winters are more harsh, but those are the exceptions, not the rule. I'm actually worried that my combination of air space heat and thermal mass heat may be overkill on some days, but then the space heater blowers will be thermostat controlled. I can even arrange to turn the space heater into a venting unit by temporarily venting the exhaust pipe outside. The thermal storage tanks can also be regulated somewhat (Arduino), although I have to be careful to prevent stagnation of hot water inside the CPVC pipes to avoid a meltdown.

Grow beds will act as heat exchangers so heat in the grow house equals heat in the water.

Also, just a thought on angles. The coldest part of winter might not be the middle of winter, so there might be some value in setting the angle to suit the coldest part. I'm not sure if that's true, it just fell out of my head.
Yes, I'm hoping to use all these factors to my advantage. The work of others from the SimplySolar Yahoo group leads me to believe that the angle of tilt on solar heat collectors is far less of a factor than for solar PV panels. One of the group's founders built a small solar downspout collector which rests at a completely vertical 90 degree angle on his basement window wells, sitting almost right on the ground. He reports still getting significant amounts of heat for his basement even with the zero tilt and zero elevation of the collector.

Is that collector glass covered?

I did some experiments with solar collectors, and was a bit surprised to find there wasn't any need to lay pipe over the entire surface. A single pipe at the top running passively as a thermo siphon was enough to suck all the heat from the collector. This only works with a glass lidded collector. If there is no glass, and the pipe is the collector, obviously the more pipe the better.
I'm assuming you're referring to the solar water heater? As drawn, it's covered by a corrugated polycarbonate glazing called "SunTuff", but I'd prefer a flat glazing such as UV resistant plexiglass or double-wall polycarbonate sheeting. It's hard to see from the pic, but I have a grid of 1" CPVC running vertically, spaced 3" on-center (shortest connection between two "T" fittings), connected at the top and bottom to horizontal headers made of "T" fittings. The collection area contains 91 vertical risers @ 7'-1.5" in length plus two 24' horizontal headers. The cold inflow header is at the bottom and the heated outflow at the top. The CPVC array is backed by a layer of polyisocyanurate (Dow Super-Tuff R) 1/2" insulation covered by aluminum flashing painted black. The CPVC is painted grey in the model so you can see it, but would be black in real use. I'm not sure I understand what you are saying about not needing "to lay pipe over the entire surface"? The size of the collector I drew on the model is 8'x24' just because it was easy to construct using standard 4'x8' sheeting and lumber sizes. The actual collector will sized using heat and flow calculations according to what is necessary to keep 550 gallons of water at around 140F. I suspect a smaller area collector may be quite sufficient for my project. Here's a pic of the solar water heater collector without the glazing:
Attachment:
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5f.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5f.jpg [ 64.81 KiB | Viewed 1303 times ]

Apparently, the ground only a few feet down stays at the average yearly temperature for your area. There might be some heat to collect by [burying] some pipes and running a fan to circulate air. I know nothing of this method other than people do it. I think you can also store heat by running air through during the day and then recover it at night.
I believe you're talking about geothermal technology here. I've briefly considered it, but I think the other solutions available are simpler and more cost-effective. Again, my need for heat in winter is relatively small, compared with the need for cooling in summer (which, now that I think about it, may be a possible geothermal application I could use to COOL the house... :think: ). I'm more concerned that my thermal storage being inside the greenhouse may cause problems during the summer months, but there are ways to mitigate that. I can simply cover the solar collectors during times when more solar energy storage is counter-productive.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '13, 07:01 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
Here's an overhead view with the components geo-located on our property in Google Earth. Very cool to be able to see how everything might fit on the available space. I had to rotate everything to get the right angles, but it seems GE has the size scaling pretty much correct.


Attachments:
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5h.jpg
MrPisky_GreenhouseAP_IBCbeds5h.jpg [ 38.85 KiB | Viewed 1297 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '13, 13:01 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Mar 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 5404
Location: South Australia
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yep
Location: South Australia
re the solar heater being no different than the growhouse - I suspect the black would make a difference. Also the ability to turn it off in summer is a very worthwhile thing.

If you can build it so that you can test it with just 1 pipe running through rather than the full amount of pipes, you might be pleasantly surprised. Especially when the pipe is full of water rather than air, there is a massive transfer of heat.

In my little experiment, I found no difference in operation using one pipe or five. One pipe moving only at thermo siphon pace (ie no pump) moved enough water to cool the glassed box, although in my case I think the fact that I had a small water tank that got up to 30 degrees c meant I was putting 30 degree c water back into the collector on a 10 degrr c day. This meant that the collector temp was around 33 degrees c.

Without the tube flowing, I saw temperatures that would easily make for a slow cooker. From memory it got up to around 70 degrees c.

With a pump pushing cold water through, I'm guessing you could get away with only a few feet of heat exchange pipe inside the collector.

I think the reason people use a lot of pipe is because it's required if there is no cover, and the pipe is actually the collector rather than the heat exchanger. Once you have glass over the top, the box becomes the collector, and the pipe just a heat exchanger. I suspect people improve their design by adding glass, and just leave the collector as it was because it was already built.

It definitely wont hurt to have it, but it might be worth your while to test just the one pipe before you connect up the rest.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 26th, '13, 00:51 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
BullwinkleII wrote:
re the solar heater being no different than the growhouse - I suspect the black would make a difference. Also the ability to turn it off in summer is a very worthwhile thing.

If you can build it so that you can test it with just 1 pipe running through rather than the full amount of pipes, you might be pleasantly surprised. Especially when the pipe is full of water rather than air, there is a massive transfer of heat.

In my little experiment, I found no difference in operation using one pipe or five. One pipe moving only at thermo siphon pace (ie no pump) moved enough water to cool the glassed box, although in my case I think the fact that I had a small water tank that got up to 30 degrees c meant I was putting 30 degree c water back into the collector on a 10 degrr c day. This meant that the collector temp was around 33 degrees c.

Without the tube flowing, I saw temperatures that would easily make for a slow cooker. From memory it got up to around 70 degrees c.

With a pump pushing cold water through, I'm guessing you could get away with only a few feet of heat exchange pipe inside the collector.

I think the reason people use a lot of pipe is because it's required if there is no cover, and the pipe is actually the collector rather than the heat exchanger. Once you have glass over the top, the box becomes the collector, and the pipe just a heat exchanger. I suspect people improve their design by adding glass, and just leave the collector as it was because it was already built.

It definitely wont hurt to have it, but it might be worth your while to test just the one pipe before you connect up the rest.


Sorry BW, but I'm a bit confused about which solar collector you're referring to. Initially, I thought you were referring to the air space heater collector (made from horizontally placed downspouts) which is only 3' high running along the base of the greenhouse. But now it seems as if you are talking about the solar water heater made from CPVC.

Assuming we're talking about the water heater collector, here's how I understand the physics involved and what I *think* you are suggesting (but I could be way off-base). The CPVC is painted black so it absorbs more solar energy rather than reflecting it away if left in it's native light color. The collection fluid (water or antifreeze in closed loop) must be pumped through the CPVC grid at sufficient volume per minute in order to efficiently capture and exchange the sun's energy into the thermal storage IBC's. Pumped too slowly, and excess heat energy remains in the CPVC material, resulting in a meltdown/stagnation event. Pumped too quickly, and the fluid doesn't remain in contact with the CPVC long enough to transfer heat efficiently, resulting in constant pumping cycles. (I could live with less than 100% efficient, but not meltdown! :lol: ) The CPVC collector pipes return to my 550 gallon dual IBC setup where they feed through a large loop of PEX tubing coiled up inside. The heat from the closed collector loop is then exchanged to the cooler water in the IBC's. The pump cycling would be thermostatically controlled by an Arduino or a differential temp controller that compares the fluid temp inside the collector vs the storage tanks.

Now, I will say that if you have less CPVC piping in the collector (i.e. smaller total collector surface area), then it can only result in a lower amount of solar energy being captured because there is less surface area being exposed to the sun's rays and less fluid in the collector at any given time. This is the same factor that PV solar panels experience. The fewer silicon panels you have exposed to the sun, the less m² of collector area you have and the lower the amount of electricity produced. There is a fixed amount of solar energy hitting each m² of the earth's surface. So, I can't see what you are getting at by testing the system using fewer pipes. I'm apparently missing something in the translation somewhere. :dontknow:

The solar space heater is designed specifically to heat and circulate air, whereas the solar water heater is meant to capture heat and store it in water. The space heater would have two blower fans pushing air through the downspouts. It would act like a forced air furnace in your home and it would only operate during the winter months, with the possible exception of using it to vent hot air OUT of the greenhouse in summer. The solar water heater would provide hot water year round, but if the heat from the storage tanks becomes too excessive, then I could simply stop the recirculation pump and cover the collector.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 26th, '13, 01:22 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Dec 31st, '12, 00:01
Posts: 59
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Far as I can tell...
Location: South Carolina, USA
BullwinkleII wrote:

I think the reason people use a lot of pipe is because it's required if there is no cover, and the pipe is actually the collector rather than the heat exchanger. Once you have glass over the top, the box becomes the collector, and the pipe just a heat exchanger. I suspect people improve their design by adding glass, and just leave the collector as it was because it was already built.

It definitely wont hurt to have it, but it might be worth your while to test just the one pipe before you connect up the rest.


Yes, the water heater collector box will be glazed with polycarbonate sheeting and insulated with 1/2" Dow polyisocyanurate. But there are other considerations which affect the heat capture/transfer to the fluid. One being the method of contact between the CPVC and the surface of the box. If you just had the pipe suspended in the air space within a glass-sealed box it would not efficiently capture much of the solar heat energy. There must be significant direct physical contact of the pipe with surfaces inside the collector box. This is accomplished by covering the polyiso insulation with a sheet of aluminum flashing. The CPVC pipe is then "glued" to the flashing using silicone and everything is painted black. Silicone is probably not the optimal substance for heat transfer, but it's been proven to work well enough. In some cases of well-sealed collectors, too much heat is retained inside the box which led some folks to use the corrugated SunTuff glazing material and not seal it completely, just enough to keep the rain out.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.164s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]