⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 20:38 
Ok, can't argue the "electrical" side of things... coz I just don't know...

But I've always been lead to believe that "throttling" a pump back was detremental.. in terms of pump life...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 20:53 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: May 30th, '11, 16:27
Posts: 1109
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Baldivis WA
In my experience with pond pumps, most of the ones we would use have the impeller mounted to a magnet.
Their life will not be affected by higher back pressure generally.
The ebara style ones with the famous caps may be a different story.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 20:55 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '12, 19:04
Posts: 262
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: Unsure
Location: Lower Great Southern W.A.
to a point you can throttle back but too much restriction will cause damage to the impeller over time, obviously each pump is different and so will react differently to throttling back


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 21:18 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: May 30th, '11, 16:27
Posts: 1109
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Baldivis WA
By the way, I am loving this thread. Next tangent? :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 21:23 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
I thought I could pull a decent debate but who am I kidding? :lol: I havnt got a debating bone in my body heheheh

Ill try harder tomorrow Andrew when I pick the brains on these (dare I say it)... auto-sparkies :puke:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 22:23 
Does an "auto-sparkie"... light up when you enter the room... :D


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 8th, '12, 23:04 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: May 30th, '11, 16:27
Posts: 1109
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Baldivis WA
I look forward to continuing to prove you wrong Charlie :P

Eventually I will make a video proving my point, but I am enjoying myself too much right now :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 00:41 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Nov 6th, '11, 10:04
Posts: 5100
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Humans err, I Arrr!
Location: Chula Vista, CA, USA
I know that this load vs wattage bit has been proven in an other thread. I think even, dare I say his name, hydracel was involved in it. Multimeters were brought out, tests were done, and yes, the higher the load, the less power. Before everyone draws up plans for their perpetual motion machines, it was not giving free power, but it did have lower wattage. That does make a good excuse to throw a nozzle on one, like one, say, in an eductor...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 07:25 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Oct 16th, '11, 06:12
Posts: 2019
Gender: Male
Are you human?: 0110010110
Location: Brisbane, qld
The pump life could be affected if it was an external pump. If the pump was running churning the same water it would heat up and stuff the seals...
I'm not sure if heating inside the "bearing" of a submersible pump would be an issue...
If there was even a small flow of water it would probably be ok..depends on the pump.

Slowing the impeller down would decrease general wearing damage on the plastic/ceramic parts and so those bits should last longer...
Reducing the current in the motor would decrease the long term effects of vibration and wire insulation degradation as well... perhaps, also leading to extending the life of the motor.

But increasing the pressure in the pump may lead to a reduction in life of seals, housings etc. Although the pressures involved are so small that this doesn't really seem feasible.

blah blah blah.. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 07:42 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend

Joined: Oct 9th, '09, 09:16
Posts: 472
Images: 26
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: South West WA
I'm sure there are different designs of eductors but the one on my old spray tank requires 30 psi
( good as 2 bar ) to run at optimum. :dontknow:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 12:19 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
To me this just seems to defy the concepts of energy.

Are you telling me that a normal household pedistal fan will consume less energy without the blades on it?

Or what about when you first start up a an AC motor, that is when its under most load and it isnt spinning real fast at that stage?

Or another example would be (using your methodology), an AC electric motor would need a lower value circuit breaker on it the higher the load I put on it?

Just doesnt make sense :dontknow:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 12:42 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 16th, '12, 11:43
Posts: 1444
Location: 'Kooinda Bindi', Muckenburra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: family Hominidae
Location: deep in the bush north of Perth, WA, Oz
Charlie wrote:
Are you telling me that a normal household pedestal fan will consume less energy without the blades on it?

I think what is being claimed by SuperVeg, Werdna, Freebz, et al is that the fan will use more energy if it isn't under load, ie if it is operating blade-less.
I think that, based on the arguments presented thus far, I would have to agree with them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 12:45 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
This was the claim....


DC motors increase power draw with load, ac motors increase power draw with speed.
Increasing load on a dc motor increases current draw, like you are suggesting.
AC motors work differently.
The current draw is directly related to motor speed, so increased load reduces flow, which reduces impellor speed, which reduces draw.




back at ya


your actually agreeing with what Im saying, you just dont realise it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 13:01 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 16th, '12, 11:43
Posts: 1444
Location: 'Kooinda Bindi', Muckenburra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: family Hominidae
Location: deep in the bush north of Perth, WA, Oz
Charlie, you are right - I don't realise that I am agreeing with you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 9th, '12, 13:05 
PLJ wrote:
Charlie wrote:
Are you telling me that a normal household pedestal fan will consume less energy without the blades on it?

I think what is being claimed by SuperVeg, Werdna, Freebz, et al is that the fan will use more energy if it isn't under load, ie if it is operating blade-less.
I think that, based on the arguments presented thus far, I would have to agree with them.

Wouldn't seem to make sense...

Surely the resistance of the blades cutting through the air.. would effectively slow them....

Therefore to keep them spinning at a given rate/speed... then surely... more energy is required...

And a "bladeless" fan... would require less energy... just to spin the bearing... as it doesn't have the air resistance of the blades to overcome...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.125s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]