werdna wrote:
I have heard many people say that as well.
But if all my fish are breeding and healthy and have excellent colours, how are they not thriving?
Life is very interesting and amazing. I can give you countless examples of animals breeding in poor conditions. In fact, even humans reproduce when environmental conditions are poor with reproduction actually increasing. This may be why developing countries have higher population growth rates than developed countries.
Also, for the most part, especially since we're talking about water exchange/renewal, if you're only doing this once every couple of weeks, months, etc, your fish are probably fine. Any damage or discomfort is quickly recovered and forgotten.
Maybe this isn't a good analogy, so I'll think about a better one ... If a hurricane came through your town every now and then and devastated it, as a matter of necessity you get used to it. But just because you rebuild and live your life, doesn't mean that when the hurricane returns, you're not 'inconvenienced'.
werdna wrote:
Did you notice a difference in your fish in the last 2 years compared to the previous 23 after adding neutraliser?
What made you start adding the neutraliser if you had no problems previously?
I actually do large WC b/c I have young fish. Younger fish have a lower tolerance to chlorine than adult fish and when the fish you're growing out are worth $10-15 and inch, you tend to take a little more precaution than feeder goldfish from the pet store.
What made me more diligent in doing WC was also because I noticed my fish getting dark and stressed after two WC when I forgot to add dechlorinator. They also started breathing at the top of the tank (make no mistake, one HOB filter, one sponge filter connected to powerhead, and a canister filter provides plenty of aeration so it wasn't lack of DO) especially when your tank isn't covered.
werdna wrote:
I once had a friend who serviced gearboxes. He offered a free gearbox check offer for 1 month.
Everyday he was checking 100 cars for free for the entire month.
Every single car, he checked the gearbox oil, then called the client and told them that there was nothing wrong, however the oil was a little low and for $12 he could top it up for them if they wished.
Easiest $1200 per day he ever made.
I don't know enough about cars to really talk on this ... but what's the real problem here? That he was charging for a service that was not needed or that he was overcharging for a service that someone could do for $4 themselves (cost of a quart of oil)?
I mean, if your car is low on oil, from what I know that causes damage. Is it urgent, probably not. Could it be a problem... yes. It sounds to me, your friend gouged customers and that's the main issue. Would you have the same issue if he charged $2-3? Then is he performing a necessary preventative maintenance? <shrug> I don't know enough about cars.
werdna wrote:
My theory is that chlorine neutraliser is the local fish shop version of gearbox oil.
There is about 20c worth of Sodium Thiosulfate or equivalent, 20c worth of EDTA or equivalent, water and a plastic bottle with a pretty sticker.
But they only charge $12 a bottle, so for $12 it is better to be safe than sorry... blah blah blah...
So again, is the question about how much they charge or about the necessity of it? Just because people overcharge, doesn't mean the service itself is unnecessary.
Take anything in this world and a pretty bottle and label increases the cost. The people who are more money conscious will find alternatives, or just make do and take the risks. I have mechanic friends that say all the time people will drive off with unsafe cars because they refuse to believe a mechanic when they tell them the car is dangerous (in fear that they're being ripped off). They admit, in fairness, that some mechanics are unethical, but at times, some consumers are just so stubborn they don't see danger when it's staring them in the face. Whether they charged $500 or $2000 for a repair that only costs $100 parts only, doesn't change the fact it's needed.
werdna wrote:
My philosophy is if it aint broke, dont fix it
Anyway, take a look at your water report. You'll see that your average chlorine is probably 0.5ppm on average to maybe 1ppm. Research has shown that anything around 0.5ppm is generally safe for aquariums. What does this mean? That on average your WC, especially if you do less than 50% is going to be safe for your fish.
During winter months though and after super-chlorination (if water company finds leaks or other pathogens), the FDA has allowable levels of up to 4ppms. That means if you do a 25% WC, your fish may be okay depending on the size of your WC and the type of fish you have. If you do a 50% WC, then you might have some problems.
For my tanks I do 50-75% WC. For Discus, they are known to have issues with requiring really clean water. Yes, I have gone without changing it for a few days and the last time I did it, I lost a fish (may be unrelated). The other few times I had forgotten the fish had classic signs of stress (darting, darkened coloration, not eating, hiding in corners, etc). For my pleco tanks, I do WC of about 5% per day (just because I'm doing my discus tanks daily anyway but sometimes I'll go a couple of weeks without changing it and not be worried about it.
Finally, pH and temperature effects how it reacts in the water and how it impacts your fish.
So, you're probably right that based on your water chemistry, fish, and water change regimen, you might be okay but then you might just have been lucky.
So like I said before, to each his (or her) own.