earthbound wrote:
Markets are well filled by cheap hydroponic products and hydroponics is reasonably simple, it's been fine tuned for decades ...
Earthbound and Dustintheshelves - thanks very much for the thoughts. To say this another way it sounds like AP doesn't fit well with the industrialized agriculture model. Too much risk, too many variables, etc. It's an industry which is very much "divide and conquer" - attempting to reduce the unknowns via genetic engineering, pesticides and fertilizers to achieve known results and then living off the margins. I am starting to see how AP wouldn't fit well into that world (which personally I'm thankful for).
earthbound wrote:
And yes, it is still very new ...
Thanks for the info - I see what you mean.
earthbound wrote:
So far as external inputs into the system, all growing systems require external inputs. If you are removing minerals and nutrient from a system to be taken off site, then these have to be replaced by external inputs.
I completely agree. Frankly I've been quite taken aback at some of the additives that organic growers put into their systems out here, while still calling their operations "sustainable". It's shameful, really.
I accept the reality that taking anything out of a system necessarily means that materials need to be put back into the system to replenish losses. My concern is mainly around what those inputs happen to be as of this writing. My sense of the situation here is that people are putting a good deal of energy into making sure their plants are healthy and chemical-free, but are most probably feeding their fish something abysmal from an agribusiness source like Purina. I am too new to the AP world to pass judgment based on this. The AP scene appears to generally have attracted a very capable and intelligent group of people who, if they're still feeding Purina to their fish, are probably doing so for compelling reasons.
As stated above - I hope to learn more about this and who knows - maybe I can figure out a way that at least for MY SITUATION allows me to set up a profitable AP business without using common fish food. Time will tell.
dustintheshelves wrote:
Monoculture also has only one market, which has its advantages, only one product to market (lettuces, or vegies in general), one place to sell (say the wholesale vegie markets). Adding fish means you need to add a separate line of marketing, research and sales. EG you most likely couldn't sell fish at a wholesale vegie market, so would need to go to the wholesale fish markets as well.
Something I've been mulling over is the idea of setting up a CSA (Community Supported Agriculture) around an AP operation. It strikes me that it might be a very good fit - the AP farm wouldn't need to monocrop its vegetables to carve out a market for itself, rather the focus would be on providing variety for the member families, which sounds like a good match. Also as AP operations have year-round production it's a good fit for members who would expect product throughout the year. Part of the membership could include periodic fish delivery - slaughtered earlier in the day - for the freshest Tilapia they've ever experienced! Also the typical CSA customer is an educated one who understands the benefit of paying a premium for a higher quality product, is generally going to be interested in supporting an innovative ecological approach to things (and as mentioned - willing to pay a premium for that), and furthermore is expecting there to be a degree of randomness to the yields of the farm - something which would offer the AP operation a buffer against the variables stated above.
merkurmaniac wrote:
So far, my experience in Houston has not been anything near any kind of break even.
Thanks for the thoughts, merkurmaniac. I'm not too concerned about your results as it sounds like you're working with a pretty small system and it sounds like perhaps the system is young-ish (maybe a year old or less?). Experiences like that have been common for us with normal dirt gardening (putting a lot of time and energy into a little plot and not getting a lot to show for it), but I recognize this is generally because we haven't put a great deal of energy and resources into it and haven't scaled it up where we can benefit from the efficiency of a larger operation.
merkurmaniac wrote:
AP does seem to perhaps extend the growing season, and seems to conserve water versus a dirt garden.
The water conservation is something that is really key here. I think you'd be quite shocked to find out how much water is used in normal gardening and farming. Especially with the year we're having here in TX - it's what gave me the final nudge over towards AP.
merkurmaniac wrote:
WHere in central TX are you ?
I'm around an hour outside of Austin.