⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 20:29 
samion wrote:
You seem to have taken Johns failure personally.

This is part of the reason I take/took exception to your post Crusty...

Yes we had to pull many of the trout, and yes the remainder died before we could address the extreme conditions that confronted us...

Is it a failure... well in the sense that I was presented with a set of climatic conditions of worse case scenario... and the result was the trout didn't get through... yes...

But such a scenario, while perhaps statistically identifiable and as unlikely as a 1:100 flood event, cyclone or tsunami... can be recognised, but not necessarily addressed within a given time frame... or more particularly within the clients timeframe and budget acceptance...

And there were many variables that required collection of actual data in order to address any response...

All of the issues, or potential issues were identified... and possible ramifications and/or solutions, related to the client... including costs, or more particularly possible costs...

As I said in the "open letter"... the decision to stock the trout was clearly made within the possible constraints...potential outcomes discussed... and potential actions identified...

If it had not been for other committments of both myself and the farm manager coinciding with that particular week of extreme weather... and the delay in delivery of a promised chiller...

The stock would have been culled... they would still be dead... either way...

The greatest failure was the non-cooperation of nature... all bar a day... and the system and temperatures had returned to normal parameters... and historical data suggests would have continued within acceptable parameters..

Quote:
I would expect a commercial venture to involve the payment of money for an installed system, not unlike this one.
This was never intended as a "commercial" venture... and the comment of "not unlike this one" underlines you fundamental lack of knowledege regarding aquaponics and the scale, and methodolgy necessary for "commercialisation"...

Even your aquaculture experience would suggest to you that even a RAS system of this "size" would be unsustainable...

Why not address the issues Crusty... rather than playing the man...

It's one of the reasons I take fault with Gary... and the HQ forum... a continued "playing of the man"... rather than the ball...

I have respect for your knowledge of all things crustacea... and I'm aware of your work with McKormac...

And I'm sure that the HQ forum has given you an avenue and opportunity to build an image for your recent systems installation business...

And I don't doubt your aquaculture knowledge... and applaud your decision to so freely share your knowl;edge and designs...

But in terms of "aquaponics".. and/or your systems designs, which I have no doubt will work from an aquaculture perspective... with respect.. it's probably too early to tell how successful they are from an "aquaponics... or vegetable production perspective...

Or indeed if at some point of time equipment failure, or human error might result in a"fish kill"...

Have you never had a fish kill Crusty... or is it just that you've only recently put some sysems together and it hasn't happened yet?


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 20:34 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 2938
Images: 51
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope! I'm a machine.
Location: Dowerin, WA
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 20:39 
SolTun wrote:
This is Ruperts report 26. January, it dosen't say for how long the has been above "24 degrees" at this date, but you sure recogniced the need to act, on this date.


Indeed Soltun... on that date the tank soared to the temperature posted... and action was taken...

The expected cooler temperatures did indeed eventuate the next day... and tank temperatures dropped within acceptable parameters...

Quote:
Looking in the back mirror(always easier) would you say/think based upon your experience/knoledge in fish culturing, that trying to "save" the stock(fish) under the ruling conditiones was good or poor judgement?
I'm asking the Q in the contecst off Crusty's general Q on APHQ

Yes, given the historical data.. and weather predictions at the time... there was every indication that tempertures would fall... and continue to fall... as indeed they have...

Unfortunately... the next week was to prove to be extreme


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 20:55 
bigdaddy123 wrote:
Hi Rupe,

What fish are you running in the project now?

Nice to be able to get back on topic Bigdaddy....

The seperate two bed system is still successfully running Silver Perch...

The 4 bed system currently has yabbies in the sump tank....

The grow beds themselves have/are being progessively stripped of old crop/plants... and will be replanted this weekend ... as planned....

It was ALWAYS INTENDED to introduce new stock into the system in March...

The trout that were stocked, and the size when stocked were due to availability... and intended as food... to be eaten... and culled down to the time of restocking...

It was NEVER intended to continue grow out of that stock to "uber" size... or as a testiment to any "size does matter" perspective.... they were intended as food...

Recent floods before Xmas have apparantly wiped out the entire trout stock of my normal supplier... an "experienced" aquaculturalist of many years standing.... (jezz if only he knew he was such a deliberate, callous fish murderer)

So at this stage until I can arrange another supplier the system will be stocked with some of my Marron stock... (expected next week)... and maintained from a plant perspective... with seasol... and yabbie poo...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:14 

Joined: Feb 9th, '11, 17:08
Posts: 9
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Here
RupertofOZ wrote:
samion wrote:
You seem to have taken Johns failure personally.

This is part of the reason I take/took exception to your post Crusty...

Yes we had to pull many of the trout, and yes the remainder died before we could address the extreme conditions that confronted us...

Is it a failure... well in the sense that I was presented with a set of climatic conditions of worse case scenario... and the result was the trout didn't get through... yes...


According to your previous post you had an idea this may happen and had planed for environmental controls, yet none of them where installed... I am not sure what that constitutes John in your version of events.

RupertofOZ wrote:
But such a scenario, while perhaps statistically identifiable and as unlikely as a 1:100 flood event, cyclone or tsunami... can be recognised, but not necessarily addressed within a given time frame... or more particularly within the clients timeframe and budget acceptance...


1 in a 100 year event? Not at all. The 20 year average minimum and maximum air temperatures spelled it out pretty clearly to me, given your set of system requirements.

RupertofOZ wrote:
And there were many variables that required collection of actual data in order to address any response...

All of the issues, or potential issues were identified... and possible ramifications and/or solutions, related to the client... including costs, or more particularly possible costs...


There has been no question of whether the client knew of it as I am sure he would be pissed if you miss led him with false information. You made contact with Toyesi long before the issue of temperature arose for the fish which indicates you knew there would be an issue.

RupertofOZ wrote:
As I said in the "open letter"... the decision to stock the trout was clearly made within the possible constraints...potential outcomes discussed... and potential actions identified...


Many "things" were said in that letter not addressed to me. As much as Joel may not like it, I predicted you would lose those fish and you did. That has nothing to do with my "negative outlook on aquaponics" but my knowledge of aquacultured species.

RupertofOZ wrote:
If it had not been for other committments of both myself and the farm manager coinciding with that particular week of extreme weather... and the delay in delivery of a promised chiller...

The stock would have been culled... they would still be dead... either way...


No doubt they will all end up in the fry pan. Did you not design the system to not require 24/7 supervision?

RupertofOZ wrote:
The greatest failure was the non-cooperation of nature... all bar a day... and the system and temperatures had returned to normal parameters... and historical data suggests would have continued within acceptable parameters..


No, the failure was yours John. What we do is not natural and hence we are responsible for what happens, not nature.

Quote:
I would expect a commercial venture to involve the payment of money for an installed system, not unlike this one.
RupertofOZ wrote:
This was never intended as a "commercial" venture... and the comment of "not unlike this one" underlines you fundamental lack of knowledege regarding aquaponics and the scale, and methodolgy necessary for "commercialisation"...


My lack of knowledge? Mate, I look forward to seeing your commercial anything pop up. I am very sure it will be one to watch.

RupertofOZ wrote:
Why not address the issues Crusty... rather than playing the man...


So what are these issues John? I raise the issues and you guys run for cover or crowd in groups. To give you an example; 12 months ago the information you presented to these forums was directly copied from aquarium forums, 6 months ago you vehemently objected to the point of solids filtration and advocated a stocking density of 30kg/m3 without any need for any filtration (anyone can do it). 2 weeks ago, you now think that 30kg/m3 (or is it 1000m3) can only be done with huge amounts of bio and solids filtration. Who is being "The Man" champ? I suppose fake it until you make it applies?

RupertofOZ wrote:
I have respect for your knowledge of all things crustacea... and I'm aware of your work with McKormac...

And I'm sure that the HQ forum has given you an avenue and opportunity to build an image for your recent systems installation business...

And I don't doubt your aquaculture knowledge... and applaud your decision to so freely share your knowl;edge and designs...


Fair enough John, it seems my experience was lost in your search to identify me. I doubt you have any idea of the work I do with Rob McCormack, though saying so makes it sound like it. I have been about for much longer than you or your supplier have been around and I doubt very much that what we do would be classified as installations.

RupertofOZ wrote:
But in terms of "aquaponics".. and/or your systems designs, which I have no doubt will work from an aquaculture perspective... with respect.. it's probably too early to tell how successful they are from an "aquaponics... or vegetable production perspective.

Or indeed if at some point of time equipment failure, or human error might result in a"fish kill"...

Have you never had a fish kill Crusty... or is it just that you've only recently put some sysems together and it hasn't happened yet?


I suppose you will have to wait to find out. Unlike you John who killed fish in your first 2 months experience. Speaks volumes I would think.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:17 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Feb 28th, '10, 06:52
Posts: 239
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide,South Australia
So the homicidal murderer poo alone won't cut it? you will need seasol to supplement will you?

Cheers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:26 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Feb 28th, '10, 06:52
Posts: 239
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide,South Australia
Sorry must of posted the same time Crusty did, I'll shut up,for a minute anyway and let you guys sort this out, maybe when you've finished you could answer, no worries, carry on.

Cheers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:31 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 2938
Images: 51
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope! I'm a machine.
Location: Dowerin, WA
Is it me or has anyone else had enough of this pissing contest?


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:32 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 10th, '08, 16:49
Posts: 595
Location: Mississippi
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Mississippi
The most obvious information, from an outsiders perspective, one can derive from this most recent volley has nothing at all to do with competence or fish health. It is quite evident Crusty or Semen from APHQ holds a grudge that Rupe has developed a fine system for a very prominent client. The real issue is that Crusty harbors extreme animosity and jealosy that he does not have such a high profile client. Crusty can only profit from belittling Rupes reputation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:35 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 2938
Images: 51
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope! I'm a machine.
Location: Dowerin, WA
bigdaddy123 wrote:
So the homicidal murderer poo alone won't cut it? you will need seasol to supplement will you?

Cheers


Bigdaddy - I dont know how to take your post.

Are the words "homicidal muderer" required? Is your question "will the waste from the marron not be enough to produce enough nitrates for the plants?"


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 21:59 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 20th, '08, 19:03
Posts: 651
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: What time is it?
Location: Near Melbourne
samion... seriously? Get of it mate.

Dont know how you do things on YOUR forum but here people have to be pretty pissed to attack ANYONE. You jumping on from another forum just to have a go at someone is not helpful and is only showing you in a bad light. Rupe is entitled to his opinion on HIS THREAD as he was feeling attacked, and I dont think he said anything to deserve you hijacking and continuing a vendetta, real or imagined.

Personally from your above post you sound like a twat with a degree in SOMETHING and a lot of 'aquaculture experience', but not much aquaponics experience... is this correct?

If that is so, the perameters in AP management make aquaculture look piss easy. The equipment involved in RAS systems allow you to micromanage every detail, whereas AP is a much more natural system allowing everyone to have a go but IS at the whim of the elements sometimes. If you have ever been a farmer (as I have) you would realise that livestock ownership involves losses - some avoidable, some not. Whether it is an acceptable loss is up to the individual, not really anyone elses business. When it really comes down to it - they are FISH reared for human consumption, and if Rupes clients are happy with the situation as I am sure they are, then I dont think its any of your business.

Sorry Rupe... my 2 cents, hope your thread gets back on track soon as its looking great. Just ignore this twit and keep us posted. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 22:21 
samion wrote:
RupertofOZ wrote:
samion wrote:
You seem to have taken Johns failure personally.

This is part of the reason I take/took exception to your post Crusty...

Yes we had to pull many of the trout, and yes the remainder died before we could address the extreme conditions that confronted us...

Is it a failure... well in the sense that I was presented with a set of climatic conditions of worse case scenario... and the result was the trout didn't get through... yes...


According to your previous post you had an idea this may happen and had planed for environmental controls, yet none of them where installed... I am not sure what that constitutes John in your version of events.


Yes Crusty... the possibility that we could push environmental limits was identified... and controls planned...

Data was being gathered and forwarded for analysis...

The client had indicated that they wouldn't proceed with any installation of any chiller (or other alternatives) until after their return...

Other possible solutions had also been discussed with both the client, and the firm doing the thermal modeling...

Ultimately decisions made to date have been determined by the client and within the budget set by the client...

All available data, projections and advice was passsed to the client... who decided accordingly..

Quote:
RupertofOZ wrote:
But such a scenario, while perhaps statistically identifiable and as unlikely as a 1:100 flood event, cyclone or tsunami... can be recognised, but not necessarily addressed within a given time frame... or more particularly within the clients timeframe and budget acceptance...


1 in a 100 year event? Not at all. The 20 year average minimum and maximum air temperatures spelled it out pretty clearly to me, given your set of system requirements.

Really... perhaps you can indicate the year and data set that highlighted the possibility of 7 continuous days of day and night temps that occurred Crusty...

In my thorough review of twenty years of dat... I must have missed it...

With regard to the mean temps I posted... I compared them to operations in Bunbury Wa & Macclesfield Vic... both of which actually have slighty higher mena temps... :roll:...

I also talked extensively with the owner of the trout RAS operation within 30km of the location...purposely..
But none of the operations above bear any resemblance to the site in terms of relevant thermal modeling

Quote:
There has been no question of whether the client knew of it as I am sure he would be pissed if you miss led him with false information. You made contact with Toyesi long before the issue of temperature arose for the fish which indicates you knew there would be an issue.

Yes Crusty, I was aware of a potential issue and made contact with Toyesi, and air-conditioning and insulation “experts” accordingly to determine what was the best approach

Quote:
Many "things" were said in that letter not addressed to me. As much as Joel may not like it, I predicted you would lose those fish and you did. That has nothing to do with my "negative outlook on aquaponics" but my knowledge of aquacultured species.

Oh.. did you… perhaps you could point me to that… I don’t read every post on HQ…

Perhaps with your wealth of experience.. and knowledge and analysis of the site, which I wasn’t aware that you’d taken the time to do… you could have emailed me with your concerns and/or advice… it would have been welcomed..

Quote:
No doubt they will all end up in the fry pan. Did you not design the system to not require 24/7 supervision?

Indeed… and with planned modifications any levels of “supervision” would have been minimal..
There was/is an intended online monitoring system that I wish to install… but as yet the client has not authorised the installation
The system was never intended to be solely supported or supervised by myself once operational… b

Quote:
No, the failure was yours John. What we do is not natural and hence we are responsible for what happens, not nature.

Oh for goodness sake Crusty… if a severe hailstorm with hail the size of golf balls had ripped the greenhouse to shreads (statistically possible)… would you hold me responsible for that… or consider it a “lack of planning”…

Quote:
My lack of knowledge? Mate, I look forward to seeing your commercial anything pop up. I am very sure it will be one to watch.

I said lack of knowledge relating to the scale and methodologies required for “commercial” aquaponics…

I fully acknowledged your aquaculture and crustacean knowledge

Quote:
So what are these issues John? I raise the issues and you guys run for cover or crowd in groups. To give you an example; 12 months ago the information you presented to these forums was directly copied from aquarium forums, 6 months ago you vehemently objected to the point of solids filtration and advocated a stocking density of 30kg/m3 without any need for any filtration (anyone can do it). 2 weeks ago, you now think that 30kg/m3 (or is it 1000m3) can only be done with huge amounts of bio and solids filtration. Who is being "The Man" champ? I suppose fake it until you make it applies?

What absolute bullocks Crusty… I’ve been a member of this and other forums for nearly as long as Gary and/or since their existence…
And I constantly make a point of advising people that information presented from an aquaria perspective doesn’t necessarily translate to aquaponics…
If I quote anything from any source.. it’s because it has direct relevance to whatever is being discussed at the time…
And while I have posted 30kg/1000L or m3… as a MAXIMUM level of stocking… I have ALWAYS done so within the context of appropriate filtration and oxygenation…
Indeed my criticism of densities and filtration ratios being suggested above that level is exactly what lead to my ban on HQ…
And even Gary (privately) now recognises and agrees with those points and acknowledges that was (then) instrumental in my banning..
Here’s part of an email from Gary (05/06/10)…
Quote:
A much smaller number (including Joel and yourself) got caught up in the dizzy stuff immediately following the establishment of APHQ. At the time, I was defending Murray Hallam (in the false belief that I could probably modify his “misunderstandings” over time)……something that I now regret in light of what’s happened since then.

In reference to stocking densities that both Gary and Murray once proposed…
Quote:
How can you reconcile things like the “one fish per 10 litres of water” when you know that, coupled with some other system design issues, is probably responsible for more fishkills than any other single cause?


Quote:
Fair enough John, it seems my experience was lost in your search to identify me. I doubt you have any idea of the work I do with Rob McCormack, though saying so makes it sound like it. I have been about for much longer than you or your supplier have been around and I doubt very much that what we do would be classified as installations.

Nope, I was aware of you, who you were, and your love of yabbies.. and your collaboration with McCormack (excuse my previous spelling)… in identifying the various species… even have a saved photo of you all somewhere… :wink:
And I was referring to your systems that you have recently been posting

Quote:
I suppose you will have to wait to find out. Unlike you John who killed fish in your first 2 months experience. Speaks volumes I would think.
[/quote]
Yep, surge protector on the power board blew.. and I didn’t notice it for a few hours… it was Boxing day.. and my Dad (from Brisbane) and other family and friends were at home…

So what… somehow you blame me for equipment failure… or are you blaming me for “lack of attention while I spent time with family…

I say again Crusty.. are you suggesting that you have NEVER had a fish kill??

Why is it that you seem so hell bent on assassinating my character… what purpose does it achieve. or what satisfaction does it give you…

You arrived on the HQ forum aboiut a year ago... what possible motive do you have for your attacks on myself??


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 22:31 
Help me out Crusty... I'm trying to find the post where you predicted I'd lose the fish on this site... and why you thought that...

I must say I'm flattered that you took the time to research the site location data...

Was it indeed part of a thorough examination of potential issues based on your experience... and the site data... or where you just guessing...

Can't find it mate... give us a link please...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 22:47 

Joined: Feb 9th, '11, 17:08
Posts: 9
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Here
RupertofOZ wrote:
Help me out Crusty... I'm trying to find the post where you predicted I'd lose the fish on this site... and why you thought that...

I must say I'm flattered that you took the time to research the site location data...

Was it indeed part of a thorough examination of potential issues based on your experience... and the site data... or where you just guessing...

Can't find it mate... give us a link please...


Why would there be a post or even an email on it John, do you live in a free world? I can assure you I took less time than it takes to write this post to consider the problems you would face with a glance at the design, so don't feel too flattered.

I can see this going round and round really. You can not see where you went wrong and have not intention of listening to those that may be able to help. Have seen this before and will continue to see it again, which is where my question about fish kills stems from.

If this is truly one of those 1 in 100 year events and with all your thorough examinations and reports, don't bother with a chiller and stock trout again, you might prove me wrong. I wish you all the luck mate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 9th, '11, 23:30 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
This is getting silly...

I'm locking it for now, and will look at splitting off the side track tomorrow.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.116s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]