⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 13:12 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 118
Location: Perth, WA
Gender: Male
Hello alll,

The Department of Fisheries Western Australia has recently made an announcement about the current Noxious fish species. These changes will be in effect as of the 23rd of July this year.
Quote:
This means that from July 23 It will be illegal to own or be in possesion of any species listed without written approval of the Dept. of Fisheries CEO
.

The species which i have noticed may affect W.A Aquaponic enthusiasts include:

Tilapia Sp. ( entire genus - except Tilapia Butterkoferi)
Oreochromis Sp. (entire genus) - Various Tilapia

Image
Image
Image
Image

(This information was made Available by "Fish Antics (Tony) - PCS")

I thought i should let you all know about these recent changes as it will strongly affect anyone who is currently keeping Tilapia in Western Australia. Under these new changes you can be fined very large ammounts for possession of fish and unfortunatley the noxious list also includes fish such as Piranah and Channa sp. (Snakehead) so fish such as Tilapia will be treated in the same light as them.

But please what ever you do, DO NOT release your fish into our water ways! their has been contact made to the fisheries about collection of fish and proper ways of disposal, also compensation of loss of fish. It is a shame that this has happened but i can see from the fisheries point of view, this is a very prolific breeding species and can withstand saltwater, low temperature, high and low ph and would easily out compete native species in our water ways.

Please also make note to check over the additions to the noxious fish if you may be in possession of them.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 13:17 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
Thanks for that Nic....

Wow, and it was only about 12 months ago the translocation officer was recommending them for aquaponic systems in W.A.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 17:13 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 118
Location: Perth, WA
Gender: Male
yeah exactley, I love it also how they state: "None of the species to be listed are believed to be kept in Western Australia".... hmmm nobody correct them :support:

Its a pretty full on change and being unaware isnt a get out of jail card, the fines can be in the 10s of thousands especially if your stock is breeding. I will update when more information is available.

Cheers

Nic


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 17:36 
Yep, brings WA inline with the rest of the states... with a national noxious species list... although WA & Qld still have specific species...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 22:08 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Jan 1st, '08, 15:35
Posts: 1054
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope - Nexus 6
Location: variable
Cichlids ( entire genus ) is listed in there ?!

doesn't that affect pretty much every fresh water aquarium / aquarium store, or am I thinking of a different fish ?

Damn , there goes my self powered electric eel AP system idea ..


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 8th, '10, 22:09 
Yep.... and it is a national list....

Here's the links for all states.... viewtopic.php?p=220905#p220905


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 9th, '10, 00:11 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Nov 25th, '09, 06:30
Posts: 48
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: US, Wisconsin
The Mississippi Paddlefish is banned? I suspect someone had too much time on their hands. Obviously it is non-native to Australia, but I don't think it is much of a candidate for being a dangerous invader. It is protected in its native range where it is neither a food fish nor an ornamental. It is a very ancient fish.

http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/biodiversity/index.asp?mode=info&Grp=13&SpecCode=AFCAB01010


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 9th, '10, 08:51 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend

Joined: Mar 3rd, '10, 12:09
Posts: 431
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Boris01 wrote:
Cichlids ( entire genus ) is listed in there ?!

doesn't that affect pretty much every fresh water aquarium / aquarium store, or am I thinking of a different fish ?




they only list one genus (Serranochromis) as banned though (and just the common name as cichlid), so most of the normal ornamental ones are still OK.
Not entirely sure why they picked on that genus. Possibly cause they have an enormous mouth.

most of the list seems pretty reasonable. Not sure i'd like snakeheads or tigerfish invading any waterways around here.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 11th, '10, 14:20 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
We don't have Tilapia any more. :cry: :support:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 11th, '10, 19:36 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '10, 21:20
Posts: 324
Location: Discovery Coast Qld
Gender: Male
Are you human?: occasionally
Location: Qld.
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/200 ... 539668.htm
I remember this article
I think they found some more this year too


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 13th, '10, 18:50 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: May 13th, '09, 21:28
Posts: 2126
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Depends
Location: Southern River, Western Australia
Seems like some members of the Perth Cichlid Society are organising some form of petition against this list.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 13th, '10, 19:47 
The Cichlid Societies... and ornamentalists... have been petitioning constantly for the last 12 months...

The national list is essentially a done deal.... with only some specific state by state exclusions being argued...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 14th, '10, 15:45 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '08, 11:03
Posts: 3690
Gender: None specified
Location: Australia NSW
I don't know why they are trying to protect the native fish in the rivers any way. If it was not for the tens of thousands of fingerlings they put in the local river every year the chemicals would of killed them off years ago.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 14th, '10, 16:40 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '08, 13:06
Posts: 2840
Location: Margaret River
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Only after 10am
Location: South West, Western Australia
caribis wrote:
The Mississippi Paddlefish is banned? I suspect someone had too much time on their hands. Obviously it is non-native to Australia, but I don't think it is much of a candidate for being a dangerous invader. It is protected in its native range where it is neither a food fish nor an ornamental. It is a very ancient fish.

http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/biodiversity/index.asp?mode=info&Grp=13&SpecCode=AFCAB01010

Hi Carbis, it may be protected there but having a look at what it eats and where it lives would make it a threat to our native fish/crustaceans, our most famous Marron, (paddle fish would easily feed on juvenile marron which take 3+ years to grow to a size of 6") which is indigenous to West Australia would certainly be threatened, WA fisheries are very protective of our waterways and ban almost all introduced fish, Red Fin and Tilapia have already been released into waterways with redfin in almost every river and dam in my area.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 14th, '10, 16:57 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '08, 13:06
Posts: 2840
Location: Margaret River
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Only after 10am
Location: South West, Western Australia
Interesting that Gambusia (Mosquito Fish) is on the list, they are in plague proportions down this way, they were introduced by what is now Fisheries WA in the 60's from memory to kill mosquito larvae, incorrectly, their main diet here is fish eggs, mainly the eggs of the Western Pygmy Perch which ironically are the best catchers of mosquito's in town, WPP also eat larvae but not enough research had been done on WPP or Gambusia back then, WPP are now severely threatened


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.070s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]