⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 09:38 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Was wondering about that myself, most plants prefer < 7pH and fish are 'safer' and under 7 as well, dont know any reason for keeping it above.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 10:12 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
just for the fish eh?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 10:18 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
I'll review the previous post, can someone please poke holes in the following theory-

given a larger biofilter area to account for reduced efficiencies of nitrifying bacteria, plants will grow better (generally better trace element uptake) and fish will be safer (from the effects of toxic ammonia) in a system where the pH is less than 7.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 10:48 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
http://www.backyardaquaponics.com/forum ... .php?t=133

check out the ammonia toxicity on this thread in the chart. Supports your comment that ammonia is much less toxic at lower ph levels


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 10:57 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Yeah read that, it follows what we learned.
If you keep your pH under 7, toxic ammonia will 'never' a problem. I've got some study notes like the attachment, but showing the grid at .1 pH and .5 temp, will find and post it later.
I assume there must be a good reason to keep the pH above 7, just want to know what it is

* never doesnt actually mean never... ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 10:59 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
Check out bacteria growth under about 6.5 I think from memory it suffers pretty badly, could lead to a crash


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 11:33 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
So i guess you would want an oversized independant bio if you wanted to take advantage of the above


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 11:35 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Jul 20th, '06, 08:36
Posts: 1915
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
In my mind which aint always so good yer cycled systems wont have any ammonia and
bacteria like a ph of 7.5 - 8.6
fresh water fish 6.8 - 7.2
all from some fish site
By keeping the ph around 7 you keep every thing happy and if your well buffered can avoid crashing the colony by swinging too low as Stu states.
So I'd guess its for both the fish and bacteria, while not being so concerened with matching ph for the plants you plan to grow.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 11:44 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Dont know about the fish prefering basic, i know of a system that has run silver perch (with a working bio) at low 4's. It was unintential and soon rectified but the fish were still feeding well.
Are those bacteria figures a preference for effiency? Anyone got any specifics on how much the drop is below 7?
Id be interested in running < 7 for the safety factor (you're right, a good system should have no ammonia, i dont assume Im going to have a good system for a while) and want to know if im going to loose that much bio efficiency


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 11:49 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Jul 20th, '06, 08:36
Posts: 1915
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
I think thats the prefered range for them.
Its my understanding the perch can handle 4.6 - 9.5 but handling and loving it are two different things. When the problem was rectified what ph did they strive for?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 11:53 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
the system usually runs at 6-7, but it is an aquaculture only facility with large biofilters


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 12:06 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Jul 20th, '06, 08:36
Posts: 1915
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Food for thought, seems like it would take longer for your bacteria to grow by running a lower ph and there by take you that much longer to ammonia cycle your system.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 12:16 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 13th, '06, 06:27
Posts: 112
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Yeah, maybe start at 7.5 or so and bring it down over time, although starting the cycle is going to be the only time you actually want ammonia in the system.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 12:23 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
It's all a balancing act really. I think a series of comprimises will see us with well balanced and stable/mature systems


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Dec 1st, '06, 12:46 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Jul 20th, '06, 08:36
Posts: 1915
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
I agree, its just easier to balance on a wide beam vice a narrow ledge. I have no idea what I am talking about either, just wish my worms breed faster so i could feed my perch properly. Nite all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.129s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]