⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Dec 18th, '09, 23:04 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
Funny how "just by LUCK??" it always seems prosperity and a LIBERAL government go hand in hand .
Can't JUST be luck every time?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 05:42 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 20th, '08, 17:55
Posts: 516
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Location: Mooroolbark, Vic, Australia
RupertofOZ wrote:
The Howard governement merely resided over a period of great prosperity... and frankly... did diddly bloody squat to re-invest in infrastructure during the abundnace of economic wealth...
And in less than 2 years labour has cleaned us out, we will be paying for their choices for decades.
http://www.debtclock.com.au/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 06:50 
Again, no... it has nothing to do with the fact that we currently have a Labour government... tax revenues collapsed to the point that we would have been in deficit anyway.... and the current government acted, as did every government in the world to stimulate the economy to prevent (at best) a deep recession or even worse a depression...

While this has placed the country in deficit... so it has every country... and in relative terms (GDP) Australias deficit is one of the lowest in the world... and the continued mining boom will allow us to repay that deficit quicker than most countries...

The current governement was also faced with the need for major infrastructure rebuilding... which should have been done by the previous governement while in surplus...

The alternative was to do nothing... slide into deep recession... with no tax revenue... and the inability to rebuild infrastructure....

That's what I hate about the two party bullshit of Australian politics.... people have such entrenched views that fact and circumstance of the time... gets mired, and/or distorted by pathetic ancient ideologies...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 06:58 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 20th, '08, 17:55
Posts: 516
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Location: Mooroolbark, Vic, Australia
Whatever


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 07:01 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:07
Posts: 8293
Location: margaret river West Oz
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
Hey Rupe it is easy to stay in surplus for ever...just don't spend and put every thing off until the next year...
of course that never comes :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 07:25 
If we'd stop judging, and voting for governements through the prism of "supposed" beliefs... and actually examined their performance based on fact and action during their tenure... and the actual "ideology" enacted... then we would be much better off as a country IMO...

Thankfully.... I think that's exactly what ... ultimately... did occur when we through a sitting Prime Minister out on his ear... despite propserous times... people were sick of bullshit, spin, inaction... and pure nasty ideology...

Of course the die-hard dinosaurs of "Howardism" that have recently flexed their muscle...think that it was merely an aberation... and that the populous was just a sleep at the time... and will return them to their rightful position of born-to-be rule...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 07:28 
The current government is probably destined for the same fate... if it continues to spin, bullshit and fail to act... regardless of economic circumstance... and rightly so...

I for one... did not vote for a continuation of the same policies and spin doctoring as the last decade... sadly it appears that may be what I'll get...

Such is the stupidity of "centric" politics... and the donkey vote...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 08:13 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 5th, '09, 03:00
Posts: 1237
Location: Houston, Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: No, The Missing Link
Location: Houston Texas
Sounds line you all down under are suffering the same fate of democracy that we are in the US. But then again, this was all predicted before we even got started.

http://www.wrisley.com/cycle.htm

Mark


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 09:03 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Apr 26th, '08, 08:02
Posts: 210
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: Perth, NoR
IMO it should be the parent's sole responsibility to ensure their children are not exposed to net nasties. That means taking responsibility and being proactive, not just sitting back and expecting the government to hold your nanny hand the whole time.

In my many years browsing the net I have never once stumbled across those sorts of sites that exist on the ACMA blacklist. It just does not happen by 'accident', you must go looking for it. Sure, stumbling across a pair of boobs is easy, but we're talking the 'hardcore' stuff.

My 3 main concerns with this proposal are;

1) By blocking the material, you force those who seek it out to go 'underground' - That means encrypted VPN tunnels to overseas 'safe-havens', no chance of interception in this scenario. Whilst researching how to bypass this filter they'll probably also stumble across such terms as 'TrueCrypt' and 'Plausible Deniability'. What chance we had of catching these sicko's will be long gone.

2) People with less technical nouse are going to think this filter actually protects their kids on the net because 'the government said so'. It will not (Google alone has indexed well over 1 trillion internet pages, the ACMA blacklist contains ~ 2,500 links.. You do the math). It will give a false sense of security, and who will they blame when their kid gets caught up in an internet nasty? The government? Will there be lawsuits because some lousy parent let their 10 year old kid have a computer in their bedroom who happened to stumble across something they shouldnt have seen?

3) Once the filter is in place, it will be expanded and we wouldn't know. There's (was) already a cloud of secrecy around what is on the ACMA blacklist (thanks to some reverese engineering of filtering software the list was leaked some time ago).

I don't personally care for the sites on the ACMA blacklist, that content does not interest me. I also think children should not be exposed to it, however I do not believe this is the job of the government.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 09:09 
Very true MrOrange... and that same responsibility extends to democracy in general...

WE need to take proactive action... and remain vigilant... passing our responsibility to a bunch of party hacks, intent on their own re-election or obscure ideologies... will only insure that we remain, and fall into ever greater control.... and that's irrespective of whatever "party" is in power....


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 16:32 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
I loved little Johnny and voted for him , I respected a vastr majority of his decisions ..... I am NOT entrenched in voting for any particular party ,, i actually helped vote in Kevin 07.
When you think about it ,, it is the swing voters such as myself that actually choose:)

Bring back Johnny , Malcolm Fraser ,, have Paul Keating and Pater Costello doing the finances BUT have Bob Hawke as the front man:)

There , balance:)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '09, 16:58 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '09, 08:13
Posts: 3284
Location: Perth, hills region
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
Are you human?: Not in the morning !
Location: Western Australia
What about Alexander Bummer ??


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 20th, '10, 07:48 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Mar 17th, '06, 11:21
Posts: 259
Location: Fremantle, West Aus
Gender: Male
At the risk of going back on topic:

The Great Australian Internet Blackout

Oi Joel, fight the power and darken your front page for a week

Also I will be attending the protest march in Perth, and it's on in all other capital cities.

I have written to my local member. What are you doing?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 20th, '10, 08:07 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Mar 17th, '06, 11:21
Posts: 259
Location: Fremantle, West Aus
Gender: Male
I just read the through the rest of this thread, props to Rupe for invoking Godwin's Law on the first page of this thread :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 2nd, '10, 04:45 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Apr 20th, '08, 17:55
Posts: 516
Location: Melbourne
Gender: Male
Location: Mooroolbark, Vic, Australia
Labor Nannies in full swing

Quote:
SOUTH Australia has become one of the few states in the world to censor the internet.

The new law, which came into force on January 6, requires internet bloggers, and anyone making a comment on next month's state election, to publish their real name and postcode when commenting on the poll.

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.175s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]