All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 17:06 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Jan 15th, '09, 14:02
Posts: 349
Images: 20
Location: 65km north of Perth
Gender: Male
Are you human?: if yes goto line 25
Location: Muchea WA
[quote="trévi"]20 years ago the organic gardners association of Australia declared
glyphosphate as a safe product to use in the vegi patch.quote]

Not now days.. the blok next door is an organic asparagus grower and he was telling me you carnt use it. he uses the big gas flame thrower thiny Gemmell was talking about, I can hear it from my place... a good 500mtrs away :twisted:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 17:13 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 19:46
Posts: 6604
Location: sunbury
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: sunbury
Yea i bought one of those about 2 weeks ago about $150.00
Yes Kuda they are ok around growbeds you only need a few seconds of heat to work


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 17:36 
Don't know how many times this question has come up before... :roll:

From a post in another thread...

Quote:
The glyphosate based-product Roundup is claimed to be the worlds biggest selling herbicide(1). It is widely thought of by users as being harmless to the environment, and virtually non-toxic to applicators and others who are exposed to it.

The acute toxicity of glyphosate itself is very low. According to the World Health Organisation, the oral LD50 in the rat of pure glyphosate is 4,230 mg/kg—or 5,600 mg/kg according to Monsanto, the developers of glyphosate(2). The low acute toxicity of glyphosate can be attributed to its biochemical mode of action on a metabolic pathway in plants (the shikimic acid pathway) which does not exist in animals(3).

There is limited evidence that when glyphosate is administered in high doses over long time periods some test animals developed chronic health effects including birth defects(4). It is extremely unlikely that users of glyphosate or members of the public would ever be exposed to such high doses and the risk of similar health effects occurring in humans is generally considered to be low.

However, while glyphosate itself may be relatively harmless, some of the products with which it is formulated have a rather less benign reputation. Marketed formulations of glyphosate generally contain a surfactant. The purpose of this is to prevent the chemical from forming into droplets and rolling off leaves which are sprayed. Some of these surfactants are serious irritants, toxic to fish, and can themselves contain contaminants which are carcinogenic to humans.

The most widely used type of surfactants used in glyphosate formulations are known as ethylated amines. POEA (polyoxyethyleneamine) has been frequently mentioned as a surfactant, but in fact it refers to a group of ethylated amine products used in glyphosate formulations. Members of this group of surfactants are significantly more toxic than glyphosate. They are serious irritants of eyes, respiratory tract and skin, and have been found to contain dioxane (not dioxin) contaminants which are suspected of being carcinogenic. Accordingly, the UN FAO has set standards of 1 part per million (ppm) for levels of the contaminant 1,4 dioxane which may be present in POEA surfactants.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 18:14 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Nov 13th, '07, 06:23
Posts: 5315
Location: Bundoora, Melbourne
Gender: Male
Are you human?: somewhat
Location: Victoria, Australia
RupertofOZ wrote:
Don't know how many times this question has come up before... :roll:


And yet a search turned up no threads with glyphosate in the title.
So I thought I'd start on despite being almost certain of it's dangers, and having read joel's opinion regarding surfactants in another thread.
A thread dedicated to glyphosate- a more common name than roundup seemed a good idea to me.
So roll your eyes if you wish.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 19:00 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sep 19th, '08, 20:12
Posts: 327
Gender: Male
Location: PERTH 6066
Boiling water... with or without salt added. I poured it on an ants nest once and totalled the grass for ages.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 13th, '09, 22:34 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: May 13th, '09, 21:28
Posts: 2126
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Depends
Location: Southern River, Western Australia
Some years ago, I tried using vinegar to kill weeds... do not dilute, just straight from the bottle and into the sprayer... It is not as effective as roundup or similar glyphosate, but it does work... Googled it... I think vinegar is quite safe for fishes right??

I think the trick was to flood the plant on a hot day... I am considering using it again around my tank...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 19th, '09, 15:43 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Mar 16th, '09, 15:41
Posts: 192
Gender: Male
Location: Secret Harbour, Western Australia
I have a vine thats comin under the fence from my next door neighbours and its growing right behind my ft and gb between it and the fence.
Tried cutting if off, but it keeps coming back. Is there anything that i could use thats safe for fish and won't harm the main plant, but stop it from coming back on my side?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 20th, '09, 04:13 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Nov 13th, '07, 06:23
Posts: 5315
Location: Bundoora, Melbourne
Gender: Male
Are you human?: somewhat
Location: Victoria, Australia
The only thing I know of is vigilance jono :-( I'm sorry bu I think you'll either have to keep cutting it back, or seal the fence in such a way that the vine can't penetrate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 20th, '09, 06:59 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
Around the system I would be more likely to use the salt, vinegar, boiling water or simply smothering the weeds.

Of course spraying vinegar you wanna be careful not to let it drift onto your desirable plants and too much vinegar in the AP system would cause some pH bouncing that would be bad for fish/plants/and bacteria so don't go dumping the bottle into the AP system. If you can get stronger than the normal 5% vinegar, it is very effective for weed control but be careful when spraying as it can burn skin/eyes etc.

There are many things about Glyophosphate (sp?) that we don't know for sure. We do know that it is definitely not as harmless as the company's original claims say it was.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 21st, '09, 07:22 

Joined: Jul 14th, '09, 16:14
Posts: 3
Gender: Male
Location: Kelmscott WA
Try 1 cup of salt dissolved in 1 litre of vinegar and brushed on the leaves very liberally. I have been trialling it and have even managed to kill some oxalis with it. I also added a little detergent to help it stick on the leaves better.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 28th, '09, 18:51 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Jan 13th, '09, 18:08
Posts: 84
Location: Mount Barker, WA
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
There are formulations of glyphosate that have adjuvant packages built into them that are suitable for use around aquatic areas. Not to say that too much of it won't do anything but it will build a big margin for error into the use of glyph if you want to.

Chatty
Jono wrote:
I have a vine thats comin under the fence from my next door neighbours and its growing right behind my ft and gb between it and the fence.
Tried cutting if off, but it keeps coming back. Is there anything that i could use thats safe for fish and won't harm the main plant, but stop it from coming back on my side?


Jono, you could try cutting it off and then immediately brushing the cut surface with neat glyph. the plant will suck it back in and it will stunt that sucker.

Chatty


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Oct 28th, '09, 21:16 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Aug 18th, '09, 11:20
Posts: 461
Location: Alice Springs, Northern Territory
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Occasionally
Location: Central Australia
I tried using Glyphosate (Roundup) several years ago, never again I used less than the recommended dosage on the advice of the industrial chemist who did a lot of research and development on this products, while it certainly knocked the couch grass back for some time there was a visible sign of poor health and sickness in most of my fruit tree's. I was careful with the application and the conditions that I applied this POISON. I reckon the best way to eliminate weeds is by consistent mulching and lots of patience, don't pull out the grass/weeds that you want to eliminate as this is a form of pruning and encourages further growth, as soon as a little sucker shows its head through the mulch cover it again and again until the plant exhausts itself lots of thick layers of thick newspaper with some straw is always good
Like I said before patience is necessary it took me nearly two years to eliminate couch from a small block
Good luck


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Nov 2nd, '09, 09:31 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Aug 29th, '07, 15:18
Posts: 751
Location: the moon
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: no
Location: space
[quote="earthbound"][quote="trévi"]20 years ago the organic gardners association of Australia declared
glyphosphate as a safe product to use in the vegi patch.
[/quote]
Studies in Denmark found that their ground water was contaminated with it and banned many of its uses. The US EPA claims glyphosate is persistent in the environment.

According to a June 2005 report in Environmental Health Perspectives, Roundup was found to be "...toxic to human placental...cells within 18 hours [of exposure], with concentrations lower than those found in agricultural use," and, "Roundup is always more toxic than its active ingredient." The researchers also found glyphosate and Roundup effects on sexual hormones at very low levels. This suggests that "dilution with other ingredients in Roundup may, in fact, facilitate glyphosate's hormonal impacts." Source: Organic Consumers Association.[/quote]

i'd love to see those studies joel, can you link? everything credible i can find on glyphosate shows it is only as toxic as common table salt. http://msds.chem.ox.ac.uk/SO/sodium_chloride.html and http://www.inchem.org/documents/pds/pds ... _e.htm#2.0 it is worth noting they mention some formulations were as low as 1950mg/kg, but that is still a hell of a high dose.
people have tried to commit suicide by drinking 500ml bottle of the concerntrated stuff and only ended up giving themselfs a sore stomach (see section 2.2.2 of the PDS from the inchem site)
as for break down, it binds to soil and it's 50% gone in 174 days http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/ex ... e-ext.html

if the other ingredidents in some formula's are a problem, i'm open to that. but lets name them and discuss seperately to glyphosate so we are talking about apples and apples.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Glyphosate
PostPosted: Nov 2nd, '09, 09:53 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '09, 08:13
Posts: 3284
Location: Perth, hills region
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
Are you human?: Not in the morning !
Location: Western Australia
Timmy

Rupe did name them, a little further back up this page;

ethylated amines - POEA (polyoxyethyleneamine) - a carcinogenic surfactant.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.057s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]