⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 546 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 37  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Jun 15th, '09, 21:03 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
I have 4 tanks. I figure that if I get enough fry I can just process the excess females into fish emulsion fertilizer for the dirt garden or blend them up and make feed out of them.

I may add another pond or enlarge the existing pond this next spring.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jun 16th, '09, 03:47 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
Looking at aeration I found some interesting info:

EFFICIENCY
Quote:
Blower / diffuser – type aeration systems aerate at relatively low efficiencies. As a result, air must be supplied in great excess in order to ensure adequate dissolution of oxygen. With a (generous) oxygen transfer efficiency of 15%, a blower system must pump 374 cubic feet of air into water to dissolve 1 pound of oxygen. In order to dissolve the same 1 pound of oxygen into water, an Add-o-mizer system only needs to inject 11 cubic feet of air.


This is the general idea of how it works:
Quote:
A system under pressure can achieve dissolved oxygen (DO) levels far higher than possible in an open basin. The system aerates by dissolving the feed gas(air) into the water under pressure. This often makes aerating with air rather than oxygen very cost-effective. As the processed effluent is sufficiently supersaturated with oxygen, excess dissolved gas will flash to vapor upon return to the basin. By controlling the level of super saturation, the size of these “microbubbles” can be controlled to less than 5 microns in diameter - 0.005 millimeters! Slow rise rates of 0.2 to 0.8 cm/sec combined with a surface-to-volume ratio more than 1000 times higher than that for fine bubble diffusers. This makes microbubbles a very efficient mechanism of oxygenation with minimal operating and maintenance costs.


Growfish [dot] com uses the same method(s) to aerate densely populated fish tanks. A 6 inch pipe is held at 8 to 12 psi; both water and air are injected. This produces more than enough oxygen for the fish without blowing massive amount of air. It would seem to be cheaper to install and run than blower systems. I can get a good pressure pump for $89 while a blower cost much more.

So.. That has got me to thinking how can I achieve this effective aeration with minimum investment. This is what I am thinking. I should aim for the low pressure of 8 or 10 psi. Fresh water produces .43 PSI/Ft so a 20' water column will have 8.6 psi at the bottom. If I use a water pump and a venturi air injector I can pump water to the bottom of a 20 foot column of water and hopefully achieve good DO by the time the water reaches the top.
Image


Now, I dont want to have a water filled pipe sticking up 20 feet in the air nor do I want to bore a hole that deep. So I am thinking I will bore a shallow 10 foot hole in the ground. A ball valve might achieve the pressure in a shorter column of water if the venturi will function under pressure like like this.

Image

Will a venturi function with both sides under pressure and suck in air at atmospheric pressure?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 16th, '09, 09:30 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
Keeping pressure is a fair cost in pumping use,,, just something to think about. That and simplicity is the reason I have chosen the "oxygenation cone" type,, extremely simple and easily placed anywhere in system ,, even easily mooved if needed.
What amazed me was a recent diagnosis of a failing aquaculture recycle system ,, the variation in O2 at various points within the system where HUGE,,, sometimes it is a trap to think o2 is ok at tank ,, but what about coming out of pre-filter , or out of beds etc. Fairly simple to plump in TWO "cones" to try and keep O2 levels more stable throughout the cycle.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 16th, '09, 23:33 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '07, 19:29
Posts: 1213
Location: SOUTH AFRICA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Hartbeespoort. SOUTH AFRICA
Be interested to see what you come up with DDM. I have been thinking along more simple lines of a spiral wheel of piping driven by a simple motor and with outlet at the base of the pond to increase DO as well as flow-form waterfall from the top. Inexpensive.

Checked out the cones Chappo. Neat solution but pricey.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 17th, '09, 14:06 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 10th, '08, 16:49
Posts: 595
Location: Mississippi
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Mississippi
Dan, you could possibly make something like this to inject oxygen although it was made to inject and saturate compressed oxygen. The water comes in on the right side and a flowmeter and oxygen hose is attached above it. On the left is the outlet and pressure guage. About 20 PSI works well.

Also, about your overpopulation of Tilapia, maybe put an Oscar in each tank to eat the excess fry. Then you can eat the Oscar later.


Attachments:
File comment: Oxygen saturater
an oxygen saturator.jpg
an oxygen saturator.jpg [ 19.74 KiB | Viewed 3273 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 17th, '09, 22:02 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
I am not willing to buy oxygen(even at 2 cents an hour). Chappo, are you using oxygen with those cones or air?

I understand pumping pressure is costly, but its cheaper than buying and powering a rotary vein air pump and cheaper than buying oxygen and its simple too. The trade secret is what psi they run at to achieve the flash of micron sized oxygen bubbles to oxygenate the surrounding water, but even without that Im sure it works. Growfish only uses 8 to 12 psi..


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 17th, '09, 22:09 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
Here is a video of the device, using pure oxygen..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23S61iA4I2E


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 09:02 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
Dan definately just air , I am also unwilling to pay for pure oxygen , I think it's an unnecessary ongoing expense.

Cyra ,, expensive??? It's merely a cone with a pipe in , and pipe out, can't see it being more than $10 to build one.Maybe $20 for a good air INJECTOR.... First one i will make will need to be perspex or at least see-through so I can get the flow rate and injector air rate matched , after that can be made from anything.

JDPhish ..... what you show there is merely a u-tube ,, just built at ground level ..... looks cute.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 10:55 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 10th, '08, 16:49
Posts: 595
Location: Mississippi
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Mississippi
Chappo, that's exactly what it is. Works too. I was just showing this as a possible alternative to a cone or 20 foot pipe. Seems you could just inject atmospheric air with a venturi and increase O2 saturation. I wasn't suggesting the added expense of pure oxygen.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 20:54 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
I only suggested a 20 foot pipe as a low pressure alternative. I was also thinking that if I could bury the pipe in the ground I might gain some benefit from ground temperatures. The add-o-mizer uses a short piece of pipe. You can see from this picture that its barely taller than a fish tank when run under pressure.

Attachment:
File comment: add-o-mizer
Hatchery.JPG
Hatchery.JPG [ 111.38 KiB | Viewed 3170 times ]


From my understanding oxygen is absorbed into water faster as pressure increases from 8 to 50 psi. So, the length of tube needed is reduced as the pressure increases. I am may try to replicate this device.

I am still weighing out the cons & pros between the add-o-mizer and an open pipe and I had another thought. The problem with down flow devices and air is that most of the air is nitrogen which means you build up a large bubble in the top of your chamber until most of the water is displaced loosing your oxygen dissolving ability. Now, my well tank has a blow off device installed to remove sulfur smells which works via float and releases air out of the pressurized tank which is injected each time the pump starts. So why would this not work perfect for an oxygenator? Water and air(from venturi) would be pumped into the bottom of the tank, oxygenated water drawn off in the top to middle of the tank and the blow-off valve would release the excess nitrogen and unabsorbed oxygen(and other gases). This system would not have to be pressurized even. It would just be a place to maximize air and water contact time and release unabsorbed gas.

These tanks are rated for pressure and readily available with the blow-off valve already installed.
Attachment:
File comment: Pressure Tanks with top blow off valve
PIC_0001.JPG
PIC_0001.JPG [ 11.89 KiB | Viewed 3174 times ]

I could perhaps even drill a hole in the side and use a uniseal for pressures up to 40 psi..

I finally received my oxygen test kit. I tested the water in the pond before sunup and the DO was 3 to 4 :shock: . I tested again before the sun went down and the DO was 8 to 9.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 21:00 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:07
Posts: 8293
Location: margaret river West Oz
Gender: Male
Location: Western Australia
Wow 3-4 thats pretty low :shock: :shock:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Yum
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 21:07 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
Well I forgot to take pictures of the salad and veggies with the fish, but we enjoyed another all AP meal last night :!:

That brings us up to 39 AP meals this year (in the last 2 months).

The salad had some of that weed that is high in protein too! Whats it called?
Attachment:
File comment: omega 3 weed with protein
persaline.jpg
persaline.jpg [ 87.59 KiB | Viewed 3160 times ]


I have always filleted fish before and have never gutted one, so I gave it a try and the result was a very tasty meal. I had a little trouble with the fish sticking to the grill..
Attachment:
File comment: Grilled Fish
fishCooked.jpg
fishCooked.jpg [ 69.25 KiB | Viewed 3162 times ]


Three fish was plenty of meat for a family of 4. Here are the uncooked weights:
Attachment:
File comment: Fish
fish.jpg
fish.jpg [ 63.32 KiB | Viewed 3162 times ]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 21:46 
Quote:
I finally received my oxygen test kit. I tested the water in the pond before sunup and the DO was 3 to 4 . I tested again before the sun went down and the DO was 8 to 9.


That's the nature of the beast... DO will always be at it's lowest pond before sunup... and will usually max out late afternoon...

4-10 would be pretty typical for most AP systems.. IMO...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 22:54 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
jdphish wrote:
Chappo, that's exactly what it is. Works too. I was just showing this as a possible alternative to a cone or 20 foot pipe. Seems you could just inject atmospheric air with a venturi and increase O2 saturation. I wasn't suggesting the added expense of pure oxygen.

jdphish ,, I wasn;t suggesting you were talking pure oxygen , that was a reply to another question.

yes ,, a wall mounted u-tube ,, all the friction loses ( PLUS MANY EXTRA WITH THE BENDS)and minus most of the pressure advantages, .....,, thanks for the input.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 18th, '09, 23:15 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Sep 4th, '07, 04:16
Posts: 2475
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Texas 75703
Ok the add-o-mizer system operates at 35 - 40 PSI (207 kPa). This is enough pressure to super saturate the water so that oxygen bubble flash out of the water when added to the pond and oxygenate the rest of the water with micro sized bubbles.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 546 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 37  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.221s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]