⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 06:24 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 28th, '08, 08:11
Posts: 123
Location: bendigo
Gender: Male
Location: Bendigo victoria
1 run about 700 fish 300 silvers in 2500 litre, 300 trout in 2500 litres, 100 cod in 3200 litres, a few cat fish and gold fish thrown in for good measurse :) all with plenty of air.. my sump is 2500 litres. 1 run about 16 bath tubs along with 4 black tubs 8)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 08:56 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Jan 13th, '09, 09:42
Posts: 240
Gender: Male
Location: Tasmania, Australia
That's a wide range, interesting! But still so far the stocking levels (or tank volume to fish qty ratio) are about what I was estimating. Safe at 1:20, mizzie I'm keen to see how your 300 go in 2500L. I guess if you turning over your total tank volume frequently enough and have lots of o2 then all will be good?

Burnsey---100 in 5000L---1:50
faye-------100 in 3000L---1:30
C1---------150 in 3000----1:20
OBO--------50 in 1000L----1:20
mizzie44--300 in 2500L---1:8.3

Also;
Air running 24/7?
and the usual fish to GB ratio of 3kg to 100L or above!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 09:35 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jan 11th, '07, 14:20
Posts: 6449
Location: Perth
Gender: Female
Location: Jandakot
Just goes to show that there is no hard and fast rules. It varies also on the maturity of the system and size of fish. We aim to play safe and advise accordingly. 1% of fish feed would make absolute sense for a brand new system. Way different when the system is converting ammonia to nutrients and masses of plant growth are bulging out of the system and taking up the nutrients at a greater rate. Increased fish feeding at this time would easily be handled by a mature system.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 09:42 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Aug 25th, '06, 14:54
Posts: 1278
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
So, what do you think about this Monya?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 13:17 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 3rd, '08, 09:49
Posts: 944
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Kalamunda Western Australia
Taz wrote:
That's a wide range, interesting! But still so far the stocking levels (or tank volume to fish qty ratio) are about what I was estimating. Safe at 1:20, mizzie I'm keen to see how your 300 go in 2500L. I guess if you turning over your total tank volume frequently enough and have lots of o2 then all will be good?

Burnsey---100 in 5000L---1:50
faye-------100 in 3000L---1:30
C1---------150 in 3000----1:20
OBO--------50 in 1000L----1:20
mizzie44--300 in 2500L---1:8.3

Also;
Air running 24/7?
and the usual fish to GB ratio of 3kg to 100L or above!


We are running no air, FT pump runs 15min on 45min off and have enough flow to recirculate about half of the flow back into the FT to aid in aeration. Sump pump is float switch activated and dumps about 300 litres at a time back into the FT (we have koi in our sump so keep about 250mm of water in it at all times).

3000 litres of GB

Our stocking rate was purposely low as we need a stable system that is essentialy over filtered - don't want HSM at school.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 13:29 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
This is where some people get a little mixed up . Because the stocking rate is normally expressed in fish numbers or weight to keep it simple , but the reality is it should be expressed in feed rate per day.
Put simply , you should never put more food in than your bio handling capacity.
Plants have little to do with it as they remove mainly nitrates which are not deadly to fish until they are in VERY large amounts.
It is amount of feed balanced to bio-filtration.
Well that's how i see it anyway:)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 13:42 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2nd, '08, 11:22
Posts: 552
Location: Mount Crosby (Brisbane) QLD
Gender: Male
Are you human?: mostly
Location: Mount Crosby QLD
Per-xacerly Chappo!!
It would be very helpfull (read 'invalueable") to operators of all systems, regardless of bio-conversion effiency, to be able to quantify this ratio of Feed in to Nitrites out.
Is there someway to measure this base rate? Say, 100grams of 40/60 food type (Protein/Carbs or other) to "X" square meters of bacteria laden media per hour for example. Or some other quantifiable ratio.
Any ideas?

Cheers IanK.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 14:09 
Yes and no Ian... there are formulas to arrive at oxygen demand and bio-filtration requirements based on feed rates...

But it's just not feed rate that determines the bio-filtration requirement... but more particularly the whole waste quantity... uneaten feed and ammonia wastes... these are not equivalent to the amount of feed input per day... some of the feed input is obviously converted to flesh, energy etc...

IMO... the figures, as Chappo partially suggests... are/or should be expressed as biomass (weight) to bio-filtration capacity.... if you have enough bio-filtration capacity to match your potential maximum biomass (see the suggested ratios)... then you'll have enough bio-filtration to cope with your maximum feed rate regardless...

Turnover is also a factor... as others have also suggested should be expressed...

But that's what the suggested stocking rates and growbed ratios are expressed as ... for simplicity...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 14:10 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
There are calculations for this ,, ammonia processing calcs for different media etc.
Also expected Ammonia outs from defferent feeds , but it really has tooo many variables.

An example is Kaldnes bio media ,, it is rated at something like 200 grammes of hi protein food per day. But that would vary on oxygen input / filter set-up etc.
I guess the only realistic way is to push your system see how much it can take. Keep adding fish ( food) until you have ammonia/nitrate readings. The bacteria will multiply to adapt but eventually you reach maximum concentration of bacteria housing within your system and therefore have reached maximum food input levels.Another important variable here is temperature ,
For planning porpouses I guess there is little better than the experience already gained by members here.They undoubtably have pushed their system , some have pushed till breaking point , I believe called HSM :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 15:32 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 28th, '06, 15:25
Posts: 1326
Location: Canberra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Vegetable
Location: Canberra
I've got 50 in 1400L (1000L IBC, 500L sump) filtered by two bathtubs (240L each) filled with scoria. And I've got 100 in 3000L filtered with two 500L beds filled with hydroton.

I also wonder how much temperature variations change how much your system can process - if you get a cold snap all of a sudden does the processing slow? The bacteria don't like being frozen.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 15:46 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Apr 3rd, '08, 01:57
Posts: 2256
Location: Australia Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Gods own country,Sydney South
Bacteria happiest in 15C - 30C ,, that is why Canberra was chosen as the Capital city , although the freezing conditions do not seem overly effective in the Parliament house:) :cheers:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 17:17 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
King Erik the 14th wrote:
So, what do you think about this Monya?



I think I have the power to delete this whole trouty thread. :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 17:58 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '07, 19:43
Posts: 6687
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Not at 3 am :(
Location: Kalgoorlie
Just to clarify, all my Trout are housed in two IBC's, but these are circulated every hour with the sumps (8000 litre) water capacity. Each IBC gets its volume turned over slightly more than once per hour, in a 15 minute pumping cycle. This really stirs the IBC up, and keeps them amazingly clear.

Air is on continuously from 3 seperate air pumps.

Sorta doing it this way to see how many fish can live well in 1000 litres, when its being circulated with a much larger water volume.

I know that a standalone IBC can hold 50 full size Trout, when circulating its own water to growbeds, but I cant recall anyone circulating an IBC with a much larger tank....


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 18:28 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 19:46
Posts: 6604
Location: sunbury
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: sunbury
Total water volume 4500 litres 50 rainbows in one ibc 40 rainbows and 10 brown in another 60 silver perch in another and all the water interconected


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 26th, '09, 19:35 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2nd, '08, 11:22
Posts: 552
Location: Mount Crosby (Brisbane) QLD
Gender: Male
Are you human?: mostly
Location: Mount Crosby QLD
Quote:
I think I have the power to delete this whole trouty thread.


Well, just do it!
Just because QLDlanders can't really do TROUT!!! AND they can't lose a football series, go for it!!
Cheers IanK :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.081s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]