⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Apr 18th, '09, 09:36 
Your Dad...gave you that "pig" for a wedding present... :shock:

I think I like your Dad... :mrgreen:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Apr 18th, '09, 18:08 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Apr 26th, '08, 08:02
Posts: 210
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: Perth, NoR
jimmy_d_ward wrote:
MrOrange wrote:
Have you got anymore recent pics?

I do now!


Excellent :) Cheers.

It doesn't look like there's any plants in the GB's? Or are they outside of the photo? (Just wondering what's supporting the trout).

Looking good! :thumbright:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 18th, '09, 21:03 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
He only just re-did the system (lining or coating the galvanized tanks and beds because of the zinc issue) so I suspect any plants already growing are still tiny and not visible.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 19th, '09, 07:51 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: May 12th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 246
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
The fish have been in for one week today! Apart from the one who decided to go travelling, no losses.

MrOrange wrote:
It doesn't look like there's any plants in the GB's? Or are they outside of the photo? (Just wondering what's supporting the trout).

The bacteria are supporting the trout at the moment. I haven't put any plants in yet, as I've been cycling it continuously and watching and waiting for the colonisation process to mature. I'm happy with the nitrate load now (~7.5 ppm) so today I hope to put some plants in. My wife has been sprouting seedlings like it's going out of fashion :) . We're looking at basil, coriander, lettuce, and we'll also try some brassicas (broccoli, cauliflower).

The cycling is looking remarkably good for one week. Near-optimal temperatures (water continuously ~15 deg C) have helped:

Attachment:
graph 19-04-2009.jpg
graph 19-04-2009.jpg [ 34.92 KiB | Viewed 2164 times ]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 19th, '09, 11:20 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 28th, '06, 15:25
Posts: 1326
Location: Canberra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Vegetable
Location: Canberra
I thought optimal temperatures for bacteria growth were mid 20's.

I'm suprised at how quickly it's colonised. In saying that, I let my old system go "fallow" for about 3 months, it didn't even have water flowing through it, then when I changed the water out, put in some fresh stuff and got it running, it was processing in no time. So I've got an inkling that once you're established once, some manage to survive no matter what, so subsequent bacterial re-establishments are very quick indeed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 21st, '09, 20:15 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 25th, '06, 07:52
Posts: 6857
Location: adelaide hills
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Adelaide Hills
a big bucket of cycled gravel is like starting with an aged filter... and the gravel was from a system that was about a year old.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 22nd, '09, 05:07 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: May 12th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 246
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Yep, it's the gravel that did it I'm sure.

From what I can gather, the bacteria are probably growing at a rate of one doubling per day, so starting with 20kg of innoculated gravel is a massive boost.

I've started feeding the fish a bit more, and have consequently noticed a second ammonia spike. Good to see the system behaving the way it's reported in the textbooks!

I've planted a selection of lettuces and basil / coriander, plus a cauliflower and 3 onions to see what happens. Also a late-germinating capsicum (but that'll never amount to anything in the cool weather).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 22nd, '09, 15:17 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 28th, '06, 15:25
Posts: 1326
Location: Canberra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Vegetable
Location: Canberra
monya wrote:
a big bucket of cycled gravel is like starting with an aged filter... and the gravel was from a system that was about a year old.


20kg is a good amount of seed media. I started with maybe 10 bits of aggregate from a fishtank... I'll have to remember that next time. 20kgs of media gets it cycled in no time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 23rd, '09, 07:30 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: May 12th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 246
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Hmmm....

Attachment:
graph 23-04-2009.jpg
graph 23-04-2009.jpg [ 29.46 KiB | Viewed 2019 times ]


I'm guessing the secondary ammonia peak is nothing to worry about? It occurred when I (a) started feeding the fish more intensively, and (b) went from continuous flood to flood/drain. So it kind of makes sense.

What worries me is the nitrite (NO2). The colour scale I'm using for the drop test makes it very hard to distinguish between 1ppm and 5ppm. I think a spike to 5ppm would be unusual as ammonia has only gradually gone back up to 1ppm, so I'm hoping NO2 is only 1ppm. Still, this is potentially a dangerous level.

pH is hovering around 7.6, and temps (measured in the morning) are sitting around 14 deg C. At a guess I'd say the temp probably rises to about 15 by the evening.

I'll scale the feeding back a bit (just keep them interested), and I've adjusted the flood and drain cycle to have mostly flooding during the day (only a few 30-minute draining times) and mostly draining during the night (one flood per hour).

I'll take some readings this afternoon as well for comparison.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Apr 23rd, '09, 07:41 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: May 12th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 246
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
jimmy_d_ward wrote:
I've adjusted the flood and drain cycle to have mostly flooding during the day (only a few 30-minute draining times) and mostly draining during the night (one flood per hour).


Wait, scratch that.

I've now read another post that said to keep the system continuously flooding during the initial cycling phase until the biofilter is properly established - so I've now put it onto a (roughly) "flood 4 hours drain 45 minutes" regime, round-the-clock. I figure I need to have a few drain times in order to oxygenate the plant roots.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 1st, '09, 20:05 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 28th, '06, 15:25
Posts: 1326
Location: Canberra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Vegetable
Location: Canberra
So how are they?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 2nd, '09, 06:12 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: May 12th, '07, 12:58
Posts: 246
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Things are looking okay at present. Nitrite is consistently high though.

No confirmed fish losses (unless the visiting heron took a few the other day!).

Current readings are:
NH3 - 0.25ppm
NO2 - 1 to 2 ppm
NO3 - 20 ppm
pH - 7.4
Temp - roughly 11 degrees

The NH3 --> NO2 process is working well, but the NO2 --> NO3 seems to be slow. I suspect the low temps are hindering bacterial growth.

Plants have not been doing much, despite the high nitrate concentration. (Or is 20 ppm not high?)

I think the lack of sunny days lately, coupled with the almost continual flood regime, accounts for the lack of plant growth. I've put a few more drain times in the cycle, and we're scheduled to get some reprieve from the winter weather over the next few days so we shall see what happens!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 2nd, '09, 06:56 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 28th, '06, 15:25
Posts: 1326
Location: Canberra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Vegetable
Location: Canberra
Plus it takes time for them to get over transplant shock, plus they don't grow much if their roots are cold.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 2nd, '09, 08:39 
IMO... continual flow systems... and trickle tower filters ... result in trace nitrite levels... for prolonged periods... or even indefinitely....


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 2nd, '09, 09:12 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
I think when people say to keep the system running continuously during cycling, that just means constantly flooding then draining... as in time out how long it takes for the beds to flood and run the pump for the closest amount of time you can to that and then let it drain for about the amount of time it takes for the bed to mostly drain then flood again.

Constantly flooded beds probably don't provide as much air to get the bacteria going as well and beds left drained for overlong are not providing any filtration while they are sitting idle.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.119s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]