⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 21:47 
hygicell wrote:
it is an alternative to siphons and timers

frank


So are you talking a standpipe overflow (Chift Pist) to flouts in growbeds Frank??


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 22:05 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gidge Hippy wrote:
Bugger this flout idea looks good but ive already set up! :cry:

thanks

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 22:08 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
RupertofOZ wrote:
hygicell wrote:
it is an alternative to siphons and timers frank

So are you talking a standpipe overflow (Chift Pist) to flouts in growbeds Frank??


please reread the description, Rupe
it's all there
or wait for the drawing

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 23:23 
I have Frank.... and have said I'm having difficulty understanding the location of the flouts... which are traditionally located at the bottom of a tank/growbed.... and there relation to Chift Pist....

I can conceptualise an arrangement that has the "flout chamber/cage set high in the tank... and delivering water to the growbeds....

But that then means that standpipe becomes secondary... merely an overflow.... surely...

Just couldn't see it as an adjunct to Chift Pist.... seems more an alternative to me....

However, it is probably a perfectly valid idea in it's own right.... and I will wait for your drawing...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 23:25 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
I think he is actually talking about the flout being in the fish tank set to only drain down to a set level. so it would only be CHIFT below a certain point.

What I'm not managing to understand is how one would lift solids from the bottom up to a flout in a cage near the top of the tank. If the flout was actually in a tub with the solid lifter pipe from the bottom of the tank feeding the flout tub, I could see how it would work but not in a cage. Would need to make sure that solids don't tend to clog up in the flout box.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 23:29 
Quote:
may I launch a maybe revolutionary idea I have been brooding on for some time?
... (sh**, I should have patented this idea and become filthy rich :geek: )


Don't think you can claim it as a "revolutionary idea".... or patent it though Frank....

Think the fellows at Rissy might have a few objections to that.... :lol:

And the role of the "flout" in AP has been discussed here on the forum for several years... :wink:

Not many have picked it up though.... :dontknow:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 23:39 
TCLynx wrote:
I think he is actually talking about the flout being in the fish tank set to only drain down to a set level. so it would only be CHIFT below a certain point.

What I'm not managing to understand is how one would lift solids from the bottom up to a flout in a cage near the top of the tank.


My puzzlement also TCL....

How do you drain down to a certain level.... where the Chift then takes over.... without the "Chift" draining all the time.....

Or the flout draining all the time.... and the "chift" standpipe remaining as a standby stanpipe overflow....

And as you say the solids lift problem....

I can only envisage that Frank aims to utilise the "suction" effect of the chift standpipe(s) to deliver the water/solids into the flout cage(s)... rather than overflowing down the standpipe to the growbeds.... :dontknow:

Leaves me wondering then as to the benefit.... as opposed to the same continuous pump to chift pist arrangement.... with fast draining siphons..... :dontknow:

P.S.... while I don't have a problem with a slow drain growbed... within reason (mainly oxygenation).... I don't really see the benefit of a "fast fill".....

Steady fill by timer delivery.... and slow drain with a drying interval.... works well...

Slow fill (relative to drain)... fast drain.... continuous pump.... works well....

Fast fill, with a flout.... with a slow drain.... continuous pump..... having trouble figuring the balances and failure points.....

Like how do you stop the flout from continually being triggered by continuous pumping.... and how do you stop the growbeds from overfilling/flowing .... if they "slow drain"???


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 5th, '09, 23:55 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
xcus the inglis

cage = box or tub

the cage idea was for Rupert's fish who are trained to keep the solids in suspension :geek:

:roll: :roll: you have not yet understood the concept and you already list all possible objections :roll: :roll:

:roll: there is something like an application patent :roll:
AFAIK nobody so far has thought of installing the flout in the fish tank
to obtain a variable level while still having CHIFT below this level
that would have made it eligible for patenting (been there, done that)
here is the flout patent:
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDeta ... cale=en_BE


frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 00:06 
Not trying to list "objections" Frank ... just trying to understand your proposal and grasp the benefits....

And yep... don't think anybody has used a flout in the fish tank... so maybe it is "patentable"...

Or it could just be posted for the benefit of aquaponics... and all aquaponicists.... :wink:

Guess your fish wont stir up any solids into suspension like the rest of ours do....

Coz you're going to filter all the soldis out.... and stack the fish so closely that they can't move anyway.... huh ..... :geek:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 00:17 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
RupertofOZ wrote:
Not trying to list "objections" Frank ... just trying to understand your proposal and grasp the benefits....
And yep... don't think anybody has used a flout in the fish tank... so maybe it is "patentable"...
Or it could just be posted for the benefit of aquaponics... and all aquaponicists.... :wink:
Guess your fish wont stir up any solids into suspension like the rest of ours do....
Coz you're going to filter all the soldis out.... and stack the fish so closely that they can't move anyway.... huh ..... :geek:

too late for patenting now: it's published
as a new year present to all of you :flower:
Quote:
and stack the fish so closely that they can't move

nope, I'm going to make sure my fish get the best water quality possible :flower:

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 00:23 
Glad to hear that Frank..... :lol:

Look forward to seeing how YOU do it... :wink: ... might pick up a trick or two... :wink:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 18:33 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '08, 11:03
Posts: 3690
Gender: None specified
Location: Australia NSW
The drain to a set level does sound familiar. Wasn't it how the the first barrelponics system worked.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 20:04 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Dufflight wrote:
The drain to a set level does sound familiar. Wasn't it how the the first barrelponics system worked.

AFAIK barrelponics doesn't use CHIFT PIST but a header tank and both the fish and the pump are in the sump

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 6th, '09, 22:33 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
Cayra talked of using a Flout in her Header/fish tank idea.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '09, 05:44 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '08, 11:03
Posts: 3690
Gender: None specified
Location: Australia NSW
hygicell wrote:
Dufflight wrote:
The drain to a set level does sound familiar. Wasn't it how the the first barrelponics system worked.

AFAIK barrelponics doesn't use CHIFT PIST but a header tank and both the fish and the pump are in the sump

frank


Then someone should tell that youtube guy. He had a valve set to drain half of the water out of the FT. Just thought it was something that was tried but no longer used. Like the drink bottle with a hole in it slowly filling until the weight opened a drain to the GB.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.078s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]