⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 968 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 65  Next

Your current favorite pump brand. Come back and recast your vote as often as needed.
Aquapro 11%  11%  [ 8 ]
Ebara 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Grundfos 3%  3%  [ 2 ]
Jebao 21%  21%  [ 15 ]
Laguna 29%  29%  [ 20 ]
Messner 1%  1%  [ 1 ]
Oase 4%  4%  [ 3 ]
Tetra 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Other 23%  23%  [ 16 ]
Dissatisfied with my last pump, still forming an opinion on my new pump 7%  7%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 70
Author Message
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 09:26 
Newbie
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Dec 8th, '08, 08:57
Posts: 21
Location: Melbourne S.E.
Gender: Male
Location: Victoria
Outbackozzie wrote:
http://www.rockaroundtheblock.com.au/product.asp?pID=328&cID=63

And no - I dont need to be told its not efficient - you show me a better pump that I can buy.


http://www.thereefshop.com.au/index.php ... cts_id=446

These are very good I have found, I have had one running on my aquarium 24/7 for about 3 years. I just replaced the impellor assembly on mine because laterite sludge had been going through it for years and it started getting a bit noisy. $60 for new impellor and its just like new again. Very quiet(I have it running in my bedroom!), well built and low power usage.

I just purchased the 3500 model as well to put on one of my other aquariums because I eventually got sick of replacing the cheaper pumps when they got noisy. I have found the cheaper ones use more power and get noisy very quickly if they are allowed to suck any air(ie. the water level drops too low).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 12:33 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '07, 19:43
Posts: 6687
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Not at 3 am :(
Location: Kalgoorlie
Good link Sleepe - that'l keep frank occupied for hours :cheers:

Can anyone explain what the % are referring too?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 13:51 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Outbackozzie wrote:
http://www.rockaroundtheblock.com.au/product.asp?pID=328&cID=63

And no - I dont need to be told its not efficient - you show me a better pump that I can buy.


why the defensive reaction, OBO?
the question was asked in a very friendly way
and out of genuine interest
as I am always looking for better pumps

and the news is not bad:
this is the best performing pump I have found so far, especially at low heads between 1 to 2 m:

Flow at 0.5m: 3900L/hr 65 W 9.62% efficiency
Flow at 1.0m: 3120L/hr 65 W 13.33% efficiency
Flow at 1.5m: 2340L/hr 65 W 15.00% efficiency
Flow at 2.0m: 1680L/hr 65 W 14.36% efficiency
Flow at 2.5m: 780L/hr 65 W 8.33% efficiency

it is outperforming my pumps with an average of 3%
which makes it 20% better

I would not hesitate to label this pump 2008's "best buy"

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 14:16 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '07, 19:43
Posts: 6687
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Not at 3 am :(
Location: Kalgoorlie
Just defensive because of your previous posting history frank, :roll: Dont want another thread to degenerate.

My total head is 0.75 of a meter (standpipe coming from other side of plumbing, shows how high the water is being pushed).

The next expansion see's the same pump going to around 1.5m, so its pretty good there too :cheers:
Thanks for the info.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 18:00 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '08, 11:03
Posts: 3690
Gender: None specified
Location: Australia NSW
earthbound wrote:
Depending on the style of system you have, if you have a pump in your fish tank, then there is a reason to aim at one larger pump rather than multiple smaller pumps, solids removal.

With small pumps pumping low volumes, generally they don't have the ability to move solids..

Of course this is very relative to scale.

:lol: I was thinking of adding another 10000lph to give me 20000lph. Or maybe later if I want to run the pumps to a large holding tank, say 20000ltr. I would just have 2 or 3 pumps quickly fill the tank and then cut off until it drains. Will have to do the math when I get enough gb's on line.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 20:09 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
Better than a Messner Eco pump Frank?
Only joking, they cost the world over here :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 20:33 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Sleepe wrote:
Better than a Messner Eco pump Frank?
Only joking, they cost the world over here :lol:

I can stand a little shaking, Sleepe :lol:
and a lot of shaking too :geek: :geek:
so don't hold back :cheers:

I don't know the Messner Eco pump
but if you do part of the homework and provide me the data
I will finish it and post the results

which show not always to be that dramatic (though still disappointing to me)
but even if 15% is still very poor, especially in view of solar applications
an improvement of 20% is not to be neglected

Outbackozzie wrote:
that'l keep frank occupied :cheers:

at least for a few minutes

then I will come back to pester you all if you neglect efficiency :twisted:

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 23:30 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17th, '07, 12:03
Posts: 1495
Location: Sonoma
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Y: I have affadavit
Location: Sonoma, California, USA
Sleepe wrote:
Hydro. If your only running 120v does it mean you have to have thicker wiring to handle more amps to get the watts?
Sorry for getting off topic :) but it has always puzzled me.


+1
But since most of the pumps we (BYAP) use draw less than 300watts (my top is about 100watts), the current is less than 3 amps. I don't have any extension cords that can't easily carry 10amps, so no worries there. It gets to be a pain with powerful equipment: my nailgun compressor will generally not run on even my best extension cords, but if I had 240V machinery I would have no problem. Of course, I'd need to be more careful when fiddling with open wires, esp in rain etc: the 120-jig (a little dance we do on finding the wire we just cut or touched was live) might become a 240-departure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 19th, '08, 23:43 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17th, '07, 12:03
Posts: 1495
Location: Sonoma
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Y: I have affadavit
Location: Sonoma, California, USA
Sleepe wrote:
"What do they have a fricken special ohms law over there?"

Suppose not, however I don't understand why you run less volts and more amps, with obviously more cost, to achieve the same result, as we do. :)


Cost is the same: the power company cares about watts, not amps. Transmission losses are greater for more amps, so power companies like to transmit at high amps. Also you can wire a house with thinner wires/less copper/cheaper if you use higher voltage.

(I should really read *all* the new posts before replying. *sigh*)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 03:33 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Nov 27th, '08, 03:32
Posts: 287
Location: Northern Florida
Gender: Male
Location: Northern Florida
little giant mfg.

model :pmo700
best as i can remember it was 1000 gph
cost 139,00 on sale at lowes

115v 3.0 amp

new 2000
removed 2005

tried it again last week and it would only hum. spin the impeller and it will start and pump but if you stop it , its done. not sure if it has start capacitor or not but it acts like thats the issue.

now listed as obsolete and no rebuild kit anywhere

my next pump will be able to be rebuilt or at least some repair like impeller replacement

this one had 2 prefilters and went into a bio filter and would pump lots of water but i guess game over now :(


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 05:21 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
Thanks Hydro :)

Johnny
Probably the capacitor, if its not an epoxied pump, you can fix them, just check the cap size. viewtopic.php?p=88116#p88116


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 05:41 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
Frank

Could not find the specs on the Eco which is supposed to be more efficient, however the Chinese appear to have made an almost exact copy of this http://www.messner-pumpen.de/document_f ... 500_GB.pdf :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 16:24 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
results for the Messner 4500:
head in m flow@head flow@head pump rating pressure in bar pressure in mbar pump effect pump efficiency
3.500 m 7.5 l/min 450 l/hr 65 watt 0.350 bar 350 mbar 4 watt 6.73%
3.000 m 13.0 l/min 780 l/hr 65 watt 0.300 bar 300 mbar 7 watt 10.00%
2.500 m 20.0 l/min 1200 l/hr 65 watt 0.250 bar 250 mbar 8 watt 12.82%
2.000 m 27.0 l/min 1620 l/hr 65 watt 0.200 bar 200 mbar 9 watt 13.85%
1.500 m 35.5 l/min 2130 l/hr 65 watt 0.150 bar 150 mbar 9 watt 13.65%
1.000 m 52.0 l/min 3120 l/hr 65 watt 0.100 bar 100 mbar 9 watt 13.33%
0.500 m 61.0 l/min 3660 l/hr 65 watt 0.050 bar 50 mbar 5 watt 7.82%

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 19:29 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '07, 19:43
Posts: 6687
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Not at 3 am :(
Location: Kalgoorlie
You can get a 4500lph for that amount of watts.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 20th, '08, 21:44 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Outbackozzie wrote:
You can get a 4500lph for that amount of watts.

these results are based on the data on the link you provided
it is a 4500 l pump at 65 watts
but at zero head (which is always used to denominate a pump)
don't let yourself be misled by denominations
it is the performance at the head YOU need that counts
not at zero head

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 968 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 65  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.147s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]