⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Oct 14th, '08, 05:51 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
RupertofOZ wrote:
If we accept all you say Frank...

you don't have to accept anything I say, Rupert
just provide me with data that prove me wrong and I will apologise

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Oct 14th, '08, 05:57 
I'm not trying to disprove you Frank...

Tried to advance the arguement by accepting your position and extrapolating from there... :roll:

So what say you to my questions???


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 14th, '08, 06:26 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: Dec 9th, '06, 20:31
Posts: 1079
Location: Drongen, Belgium
Gender: Male
Location: Drongen, Belgium
RupertofOZ wrote:
I'm not trying to disprove you Frank...
Tried to advance the argument by accepting your position

nope you didn't, Rupe
you are one of a bunch of extremely helpful people on this forum
for which I thank you
sincerely
I have confirmed this on more than one occasion

but you are systematically going into opposition to whatever I write
I am truly bored by it and will only respond to data that prove me wrong
in which case I repeat I will apologize

please stop deviating from the subject at hand
which in this case (again !!!) is the efficiency of airlift pumps and diffusers aeration
other aeration systems have nothing to do with it.

I have said all I wanted

only data on airlift pumps and diffusers and their efficiency will entice me to react as that and only that is the subject of this thread and of the discussion at hand

but I will keep remembering you of this if you deviate
your own signature "to sin by silence..." is what I am responding to
don't let it backfire on you

excuse the harsh words
I really think you are a swell person
but you are driving me nuts

frank


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Oct 14th, '08, 06:33 
Sorry if I misinterpreted you Frank.... I read your post as suggesting that you specifically thought that other methods, that you mentioned, were more efficient and preferrable...

Hence my question as to "ow do we measure and compare the efficiencies".. and "ow efficient overall are the alternative methods when one factors in the cost of energies involved"..

Entirely on topic... i would have thought... energy efficiency.... :lol:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.272s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]