mrgrackletx wrote:
Commercial sized systems would probably be fine.. main reasons is they would use plants for nitrate breakdown, carbon for dissolved organics removal, and top-off for nutrient replenishment.. This is fine, for a commercial sized system. The top-off nutrient replacement, when losing hundreds of gallons of water each day from evaporation, is more than enough to constitute keeping the alkalinity up in the water..
In a small home-based domestic aquarium, not so much the case. 2-3 gallons of top-off water is simply not enough to replenish the needs of a well-stocked home aquarium.
Hunh?? It is proportionately and chemically the same, I think.
mrgrackletx wrote:
The dissolved organics I am worried about, are dissolved organic compounds.. (DOCs) The waste product of fish that can not be broken down by the nitrogen cycle, and can only be removed through resins and water changes.
I have heard of alot of 'self-sustaining' systems before.. It seems the larger the system, the more self-sustaining it can be.. I know that the large aquaria in Nevada's casinos does not do water changes, but only replaces lost evaporation water. However, their tanks are filled with sickly looking fish, very high nitrates, and the longevity of the fish in their care is shortened compared to large scale aquaria that performed water changes. Hole in the Head and Lateral Line Erosion is a very common disease in these large public aquariums that don't change water frequently.. lack of minerals.
I've read about a fellow who recirculated various polluted water through a series of tubes (no, not the internet, Senator Stevens!) and found that biological communities sprang up that fed upon and broke down any DOC that he put in. These communities changed and reconfigured depending on what he ran through the system. Unfortunately it was pre-web and I don't have the ref, but the point is that, unlike the small-filter (probably) aquaria at the casinos, the aquaponics growbeds are huge surface-area filters with a diverse biological community that evolves to eat any fine particulates or DOCs the fish send it.
If the casinos ran their aquarium water past their plants they would have healthier plants and fish (ignoring factor of drunken patrons finding bathrooms too far to bother....and smokers disposing of their toxic butts. "baccy is a good pesticide, but not a good aquarium amendment))