⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Jan 12th, '08, 23:47 
Quote:
DOM is made up of any carbon compounds (contain at least a carbon and hydrogen atom) that are dissolved in water... (edited)

So it would seem to me that if the compounds are waste that nothing can use then they're pretty much non-reactive right?


Couple of points, both carbon and hydrogen are the two main building blocks of nature.... because they are so readily "reactive" and will either make or break molecular bonds in most other compounds.....

Quote:
Also, in an aquaponics system we're constantly removing organic matter from the system in the form of fish and plants, so maybe this is where a lot of this stuff goes...


Here's the crux of the matter I feel and the point which may be lost on your friend... yes we are removing organic matter from the system in the form of fish and plants. But we are doing it by the "reactive" breakdown of these compounds by the Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter bacteria ... the most crucial component in the cycle and a process that does not take place in aquaria or even in aquaculture systems because the nitratres and other trace elements and DOM aren't removed by the uptake of the plants and the bio-filtering process of the growbeds which we utilise in AP

This is the crux and the crucial difference between AP and aquaculture or aquaria system. Those systems deal with DOM by foam fractionators, protein skimmers, external bio-filters and constant water changes...

We don't have to..... the natural processes occurring in the growbeds deal with the problem, just as nature cleanses a natural waterway... or as can be seen even polluted waterways ie. reed beds.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject: Re: Dissolved Organics
PostPosted: Jan 13th, '08, 00:47 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17th, '07, 12:03
Posts: 1495
Location: Sonoma
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Y: I have affadavit
Location: Sonoma, California, USA
mrgrackletx wrote:
Commercial sized systems would probably be fine.. main reasons is they would use plants for nitrate breakdown, carbon for dissolved organics removal, and top-off for nutrient replenishment.. This is fine, for a commercial sized system. The top-off nutrient replacement, when losing hundreds of gallons of water each day from evaporation, is more than enough to constitute keeping the alkalinity up in the water..

In a small home-based domestic aquarium, not so much the case. 2-3 gallons of top-off water is simply not enough to replenish the needs of a well-stocked home aquarium.


Hunh?? It is proportionately and chemically the same, I think.

mrgrackletx wrote:
The dissolved organics I am worried about, are dissolved organic compounds.. (DOCs) The waste product of fish that can not be broken down by the nitrogen cycle, and can only be removed through resins and water changes.

I have heard of alot of 'self-sustaining' systems before.. It seems the larger the system, the more self-sustaining it can be.. I know that the large aquaria in Nevada's casinos does not do water changes, but only replaces lost evaporation water. However, their tanks are filled with sickly looking fish, very high nitrates, and the longevity of the fish in their care is shortened compared to large scale aquaria that performed water changes. Hole in the Head and Lateral Line Erosion is a very common disease in these large public aquariums that don't change water frequently.. lack of minerals.


I've read about a fellow who recirculated various polluted water through a series of tubes (no, not the internet, Senator Stevens!) and found that biological communities sprang up that fed upon and broke down any DOC that he put in. These communities changed and reconfigured depending on what he ran through the system. Unfortunately it was pre-web and I don't have the ref, but the point is that, unlike the small-filter (probably) aquaria at the casinos, the aquaponics growbeds are huge surface-area filters with a diverse biological community that evolves to eat any fine particulates or DOCs the fish send it.

If the casinos ran their aquarium water past their plants they would have healthier plants and fish (ignoring factor of drunken patrons finding bathrooms too far to bother....and smokers disposing of their toxic butts. "baccy is a good pesticide, but not a good aquarium amendment))


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 7th, '08, 06:55 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 7th, '06, 20:23
Posts: 936
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Location: South Australia
I found this the other night which seems to fit in with this discussion:

article

I abstractly read it as, the biofilm on the gravel/growbed medium is better then many other forms of mechanical filtration because it attaches to the small particles as well as trapping the large particles. Doesn't specify how small the "small particles" are though


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 7th, '08, 07:27 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
Hate those buy the article sites.

Appears it has gone into commercial production however :)

http://www.expo-net.dk/sw289.asp


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.186s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]