All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 31st, '17, 17:18 

Joined: Jan 31st, '17, 16:59
Posts: 2
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: London
Hello all.

I'm designing some 5' towers to put out the front of my house. I'm going to make them from uPVC tubing with a slot cut down the front and filled with folded reticulated foam (You are all probably familiar with this design)

I've spoken to a few manufacturers who have sent me samples of 10, 20 and 30 PPI reticulated foam. Now I'm trying to figure out which is best.

10 PPI seems like it might be a good choice as the holes in the foam are much larger for both water and roots to pass through. It might also be the easiest to clean after use.

Is there a reason that I should go for either 20 or 30 PPI instead? e.g. more supportive for root structure or larger biological surface area?

Any thoughts would be appreciated!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Feb 1st, '17, 04:02 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 26th, '10, 07:17
Posts: 9104
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Oregon, USA
Welcome to the forum LOMAX :wave:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 12th, '17, 07:18 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend

Joined: May 31st, '15, 17:38
Posts: 317
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Natalia, Texas
LOMAX wrote:
Hello all.

I'm designing some 5' towers to put out the front of my house. I'm going to make them from uPVC tubing with a slot cut down the front and filled with folded reticulated foam (You are all probably familiar with this design)

I've spoken to a few manufacturers who have sent me samples of 10, 20 and 30 PPI reticulated foam. Now I'm trying to figure out which is best.

10 PPI seems like it might be a good choice as the holes in the foam are much larger for both water and roots to pass through. It might also be the easiest to clean after use.

Is there a reason that I should go for either 20 or 30 PPI instead? e.g. more supportive for root structure or larger biological surface area?

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

50-60 ppi we've always have used. The white strip they are now using you can buy at a fabric store, its 100% Polyester fabric.

Does your manufacture do 8' or 10' sheets, otherwise you have scrap left over out of a 8' sheet. make sure you get that pc. By the way this is what the same as Matala is.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 16th, '17, 18:23 

Joined: Jan 31st, '17, 16:59
Posts: 2
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: London
Old Prospector wrote:
50-60 ppi we've always have used. The white strip they are now using you can buy at a fabric store, its 100% Polyester fabric.

Does your manufacture do 8' or 10' sheets, otherwise you have scrap left over out of a 8' sheet. make sure you get that pc. By the way this is what the same as Matala is.

Ok, thats a surprise. I have a 40ppi sample and even that looks far too dense for roots to grow through.

Do the roots grow through 50-60ppi or do they stay sandwiched between the two strips of foam?

If they stay sandwiched between layers of 50-60ppi, would there be an advantage to using 10ppi so the roots could spread throughout the material?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.042s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]