All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 12:13 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
I have 330gals FT with 2 GBs. And 100gal sump and 15gal radial filter. ( thinking about adding a baffled filter to get more solids out )
For my SLO I've been using 1 1/4in pipe in this order. FT to radial flow to GBs. I've had this setup for about 8months now. It works fine but I'm noticing when I try to add a Venturi it slows down my water flow and thus causing problems with my siphons not shutting off. I've tried upgrading from a 620gph pump to a 3000gph but the larger pump even with it turned down over flows my FT. So Venturis are out of the question.

My question to you guys is , for over all better performance of my system, for the setup that I have do I need to upgrade my SLO to maybe 2in ?
If so do I run 2in all the way around through the filters and into my GBs?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 12:32 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 2938
Images: 51
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope! I'm a machine.
Location: Dowerin, WA
I don't think there has been any trials or tests done regarding optimal SLO size. The general consensus is the bigger the better.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 13:00 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 10:44
Posts: 3455
Location: Loomberah NSW
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Im a force of nature
Location: I'm right here
Too big and it wont lift larger solids, too small and the FT overflows.

However, 32mm is way too small for a 3000gph pump (even small US gallons)!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 15:40 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Aug 26th, '10, 07:17
Posts: 9104
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Oregon, USA
Have you considered just ditching the siphons and running Constant Flood?

Other than enlarging the SLO, you could also go to something along the lines of a Cornell dual drain setup with the higher capacity pump.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 20:09 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
Gunagulla wrote:
Too big and it wont lift larger solids, too small and the FT overflows.

However, 32mm is way too small for a 3000gph pump (even small US gallons)!



But I have the pump turned down with valves.
Like I said its not a problem until I try and hookup a Venturi or increase the water flow


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 20:12 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
scotty435 wrote:
Have you considered just ditching the siphons and running Constant Flood?

Other than enlarging the SLO, you could also go to something along the lines of a Cornell dual drain setup with the higher capacity pump.


As troublesome the siphons are I really enjoy watching and hearing them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 20:26 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Jul 2nd, '14, 14:59
Posts: 1848
Images: 0
Location: Peakhurst - Sydney
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Thought I WAS
Location: Sydney
Wjason777 wrote:
As troublesome the siphons are I really enjoy watching and hearing them.

And you learn little tricks to make their operation more reliable...
....


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 20:37 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
Buidoi, that's my whole goal
Just trying to fine tune everything, to get better performance and water quality.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 20:56 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 6th, '14, 20:25
Posts: 3854
Location: 2.2 kilometers up, NM, USA
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Series of particles
Location: Sapello, New Mexico USA
I've got 1 1/2 inch (32 mili) SLO pipe. Yes, it is too small. And my system (FT) is 2600 gallons. I've built with cement, so I don't have a lot of choice. I now have a 200 micron sock filter on the overflow. It catches an amazing amount of gunk. It would have been far better to run it all through the RFF MBBR combo. Only good thing about it is the retention time in the MBBR is longer because of the small SLO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 21:35 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
boss wrote:
I've got 1 1/2 inch (32 mili) SLO pipe. Yes, it is too small. And my system (FT) is 2600 gallons. I've built with cement, so I don't have a lot of choice. I now have a 200 micron sock filter on the overflow. It catches an amazing amount of gunk. It would have been far better to run it all through the RFF MBBR combo. Only good thing about it is the retention time in the MBBR is longer because of the small SLO.


I don't have any experience with MBBRs since I have 2 GBs do I need one?

I've herd nothing but great things about the Sock filters, plus they are really cheap. I've even herd of people using a 200micron sock for a few days then change it out with a 100 micron sock with amazing results.

Far as my setup if 1 1/4 is too small do you think I should up grade up at least 1 1/2 since I only have 330gal Ft?
If so do I just run the 1 1/2 pvc from the SLO through my filters then GBs?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 3rd, '15, 22:23 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Jul 6th, '14, 20:25
Posts: 3854
Location: 2.2 kilometers up, NM, USA
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Series of particles
Location: Sapello, New Mexico USA
I wasn't saying I know diddly about fluid dynamics, although I may have made it sound like I do, sorry. There are plenty of people who do know what will work on a smaller system. I did a moving bed bio-filter because I wanted to raise my fish stocking density, which we did not and I'm glad of it. One of the cool things about the RFF is you can see what is coming up through the SLO and if it is working. Another thing I didn't snap to, which became apparent after our trout fry started growing is the quantity of poop the SLO needs to move. I think this is why you'll hear that your 1 1/4 inch pipe is too small. At some point the pipe can be too big as well to effectively raise poo particles. All I am saying is with your setup you can change it later, right? Just try what you have. You'll see if it is working. Or go up to two inch and try that. Hope this helps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 4th, '15, 06:44 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Jul 29th, '13, 07:58
Posts: 3382
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: West Florida, USA
I would run at least a 2" SLO on a 300 gallon IBC.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 4th, '15, 06:48 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Mar 27th, '14, 03:53
Posts: 82
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: Savannah, Ga
coachchris wrote:
I would run at least a 2" SLO on a 300 gallon IBC.


Would you run 2in all the way through the radial flow and baffle then to GBs?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.053s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]