All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 11th, '07, 09:52 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
Dan, fill drain times are fine :) mine fill in a couple of minutes and drain in around 45 sec.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 15th, '07, 00:16 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Quote:
I'm beginning to think 2:1 is some kind of magic fill/drain ratio. I haven't heard of a siphon that was very far from it.


Heh, I timed the fill and drain for one of my beds and it's 5 minutes fill and about 4 minutes drain, so that blows that idea all to heck.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 17th, '07, 13:10 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: May 20th, '07, 20:48
Posts: 442
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a metal machine!
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Just started up my siphon and it's about 40 minutes fill, 20 drain, so for me it's 2:1. Hopefully when I fill the GB with hydroton (clay balls) my cycle will be somewhere around 20/10.

The 2:1 ratio also means that the siphon output is about twice the pump input, by the way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 17th, '07, 15:14 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18th, '06, 09:41
Posts: 9072
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Brisbane
Thomas - have you calculated the displacement rate for Hydroton (I'm just too lazy to do myself at this point).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 17th, '07, 21:59 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: May 20th, '07, 20:48
Posts: 442
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a metal machine!
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Actually, today at uni I learned that the maximum theoretical packing density of perfectly round balls is 74% (HCP and FCC atom structures, for instance). I think hydroton balls would be quite close to that; they wouldn't be stacked perfectly but then they're not perfectly round either so that might fill up some gaps.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 17th, '07, 22:03 
Hey Xzorby ... there's a bloke down our way that seems to pack Murray Cod into a tank at around those densities :lol: .....

Sadly it's reported they all died....... :lol:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 18th, '07, 16:25 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Quote:
they wouldn't be stacked perfectly but then they're not perfectly round either so that might fill up some gaps.


...or make bigger gaps :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 20th, '07, 02:20 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: May 20th, '07, 20:48
Posts: 442
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a metal machine!
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
The hydroton arrived; I just measured it: it takes up about 60% of the volume. And the clay balls also take up about 5% of their volume in water.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 20th, '07, 17:33 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Quote:
The hydroton arrived; I just measured it: it takes up about 60% of the volume


I take it that means 60% hydroton and 40% water, this is about what most of us have found with gravel media also


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 20th, '07, 18:03 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18th, '06, 09:41
Posts: 9072
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Brisbane
I reckon my gravel takes a fair bit less water than 40%


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 20th, '07, 18:32 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
I think mine is too now it has matured and has plenty of root growth throughout the beds - my water usage is climbing with this hot weather


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 28th, '07, 22:46 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Sep 11th, '07, 05:53
Posts: 65
Location: Tennessee
Gender: Male
Ok, so I got my tank, and bed. Now I am gathering up some plumbing and I have a problem. The measurements giving for the bell siphon work out to be 1.5 inch and 2.5 inch, but I can't find any 2.5 inch the next size up from 2 is 3.
Should I use 2 inch and 3 inch, or 1 inch and 2 inch? What would the differance be as far as Amount of water need to start the siphon? My thinking would be with the bigger pipe I could probably go with a shorter assembly in that I believe it would take more pressure to start it, and that once it starts it would drain the tank faster due to increased pressure and diameter.

Does that sound about right?

This will be draining a 40 gal GB.

Thanks,
Steve

ps. with anyluck I might get my greenhouse up this weekend and start assembling this thing so I can post some pics. I know how you guys/gals love pics.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 28th, '07, 23:39 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Hi Steve, it depends on the ratee that the pump is putting water into the bed, but I would go smaller rather than larger. You can slow a pump down (by diverting some of the flow) easier than speeding it up.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 28th, '07, 23:53 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Jul 10th, '07, 22:53
Posts: 680
Location: Perth WA
Gender: Male
Quote:
My thinking would be with the bigger pipe I could probably go with a shorter assembly in that I believe it would take more pressure to start it, and that once it starts it would drain the tank faster due to increased pressure and diameter.

the level of water is what starts the syphon, there is no pressure required.
The diameter and fall of the syphon is what determines the syphon flow from the GB.
If you are filling at 10 litres per minute, then you need a syphon which will reliably start at this rate and empty the bed at a greater flow rate than this, so syphon flow needs to be greater than fill flow.

I think that I have understood this correctly. Please educate me if I have it wrong.
Thanks,
tony


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sep 29th, '07, 08:25 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Sep 11th, '07, 05:53
Posts: 65
Location: Tennessee
Gender: Male
By pressure I was refering to the pressure exerted by the weight of the water.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.042s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]