All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Feb 1st, '08, 07:51 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Dec 21st, '07, 14:35
Posts: 261
Location: Vancouver, WA, USA
Gender: Female
Thanks JP. I am good at tracking data... part of my job. :) So, I'll do that here and see what I can learn. Now, back to cleaning tanks... :p


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: May 18th, '08, 10:23 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: May 20th, '07, 20:48
Posts: 442
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a metal machine!
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Not sure if it's been posted before, but this document (page 6-7, 'aquaculture') talks about a 'new technology' called a 'biofloc system' where organic particles (biofloc) are kept in suspension where aerobic bacteria (nitrobacter and nitrosomonas?) turn it into nitrate, which is then fed through anaerobic denitrification channels, much like the RSG filter. I'm not entirely sure exactly how it works though.
The document describes an experiment with a 'biofloc system' and tilapia. Maybe it's of use to somebody.

Quote:
The combined impact of both channels reduced nitrate-nitrogen concentrations by 374 mg/liter in the rearing tank.

Quote:
Biofloc systems have the potential of replacing standard pond production in areas with limited water supplies because it requires only 3-4% of the water used in pond culture, and, unlike pond culture, it recovers solids and nutrients, which can be reused for field crop production.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 18th, '08, 12:44 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17th, '07, 12:03
Posts: 1495
Location: Sonoma
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Y: I have affadavit
Location: Sonoma, California, USA
Xzorby wrote:
Not sure if it's been posted before, but this document (page 6-7, 'aquaculture') talks about a 'new technology' called a 'biofloc system' where organic particles (biofloc) are kept in suspension where aerobic bacteria (nitrobacter and nitrosomonas?) turn it into nitrate, which is then fed through anaerobic denitrification channels, much like the RSG filter. I'm not entirely sure exactly how it works though.
The document describes an experiment with a 'biofloc system' and tilapia. Maybe it's of use to somebody.

Quote:
The combined impact of both channels reduced nitrate-nitrogen concentrations by 374 mg/liter in the rearing tank.

Quote:
Biofloc systems have the potential of replacing standard pond production in areas with limited water supplies because it requires only 3-4% of the water used in pond culture, and, unlike pond culture, it recovers solids and nutrients, which can be reused for field crop production.



Interesting: rather than use a gravel growbed as we typically do with AP or a Fluidized Sand Bed, this method simply suspends the fish poo, etc with some serious pumping action and lets the bacteria colonize the surface of these particles, adding lots more oxygen for the fish and nitrification. (I wouldn't wonder if the bacteria could even simply live suspended without colonizing poo bits (pb?), becoming suspended organic particles themselves).

It looks as though that is all good, but the pb builds up as it does not have the gravel growbeds, worms, etc that we use to deal with it, so they have a settling tank to reduce levels to something reasonable.

The nitrates build up too high at some times, so they also have detention ponds where pb etc can settle, create a permanent anoxic region, and break the nitrates into N2. Shame to lose the nitrates that plants would love, but we humans are dumping way too much into Biosphere I for anyone's good. (Another vote for closed systems! Here's to AP!)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 18th, '08, 13:28 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
HP, what are you using the term "pb" to mean?

i keep thinking you're saying LEAD ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 19th, '08, 02:36 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Nov 3rd, '06, 01:30
Posts: 3131
Location: Cochranville, Pennsylvania USA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
My Fluidized sand Bed was doing the biofloc thing, too. The sand was suspended in the lower part of the chamber, and the poo was a suspended layer above it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 19th, '08, 07:00 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 27th, '06, 04:57
Posts: 6480
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: I'm a pleasure droid
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Very interesting! Thanks for the link Thomas!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 19th, '08, 09:01 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: May 28th, '07, 16:24
Posts: 667
Location: Adelaide
Gender: Male
Location: South Australia, AUS
Quote:
poo bits (pb?)

skim reading again Steve...you'll go blind :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 23rd, '08, 23:52 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17th, '07, 12:03
Posts: 1495
Location: Sonoma
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Y: I have affadavit
Location: Sonoma, California, USA
steve wrote:
HP, what are you using the term "pb" to mean?

i keep thinking you're saying LEAD ;)


Not too far off: one often finds poo bits (pb) in the plumbum (pb).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 15th, '08, 21:46 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '07, 19:29
Posts: 1213
Location: SOUTH AFRICA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Hartbeespoort. SOUTH AFRICA
Fascinating thread. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 15th, '08, 22:41 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
good to see you trawling through old threads chelle!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 16th, '08, 05:43 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
The problem I found with the filter is that it works great for 2-3 months, then a thick coating of sediment builds up on top of the sand/carbon mix which stopped any flow through the mix in the pipe...tried using stockings as a filter but this just prolonged the build up (and was cleaning woman's stockings on a weekly basis :roll: )


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sep 17th, '08, 22:25 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '07, 19:29
Posts: 1213
Location: SOUTH AFRICA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Hartbeespoort. SOUTH AFRICA
What if it was done with DD's idea EKB?

Dave Donley wrote:
If I were to try another RSG filter I would take a big pipe and cap both ends, with an inlet and outlet at each end to make a flow through filter. Set the pipe on its side full of sand, but with an inch or two of open area at the top to let the water flow. That way it may limit how stagnant the sand gets - maybe it would perform better because the pipe could be 4 feet long instead of limited by a grow bed's depth.


My interest is in the chelated iron. I think I read somewhere it is easily in short supply but if correctly supplied can even affect the taste of the fish positively - besides the obvious need in the plants. I have a real interest in alternates to commercial inputs if at all possible.

I think I would prefer to put this outside the bed and before the Fish Tank. Nitrates are to produce vegetative growth. Any excess after passing through the GBs becomes less desirable. Cleaner water for the fish... and I bet those bacteria offer much else we don't even suspect.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 18th, '08, 06:25 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
I haven't tried Dave's idea but re-reading it, I think it would also gather a lot of crap in it and thus need cleaning on a regular basis...this could be reduced by placing it before the water entering the FT as you suggested.

There has been a theory (put up by vb), that anaerobic areas exist in the GBs and help in balancing the system out by chomping on the NO3 - I am starting to think there is some merit in it but don't have any means of testing this :oops:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 18th, '08, 20:33 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 6th, '07, 19:29
Posts: 1213
Location: SOUTH AFRICA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Hartbeespoort. SOUTH AFRICA
Yes. I would agree about there being anearobic areas within the GB.... in corners where sand etc has collected .. and then especially if the media used is a pebble with very uneven shapes... lots of nooks and crannies.

This would not help with iron chelation in any meaningful way though, would it? I am very keen to get that right..... believe it is possible... use an iron pipe for starters as suggested earlier in this thread. Place it where least solids can clog.... design it for ease of cleaning.... top of pipe on DDs design made into a lid?

Do you think there would be a chance of enough iron chelation occurring to warrant the effort?...

Also do a by-pass for when iron levels balanced.

What you think? :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sep 19th, '08, 06:22 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21st, '06, 16:07
Posts: 5323
Location: Brisbane
Gender: Male
With you now C, I was wondering about the reference to iron before :oops:

The RSG filter was originally for reducing NO3 levels and I was mainly interested in that...the rusty nails was an after thought that Janet tossed in to see how it went.

I had uncovered steel rods in use with the door actuators and they lasted ~ a month before they rusted through and snapped (BYAP fish water is all powerful)...nails could be just thrown in anywhere and would then break down to help with the iron chelation levels without having to put it in an anaerobic area.

I bought a packet of chelated iron (powder form) and use that to regulate the amount of iron I put into my system.

Further to the steel rods - I covered them by sliding some 3mm air tube along the length and sealing each end with some silicone - once covered the rods have worked properly (haven't rusted through) for over 12 months now :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.053s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]