⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 00:46 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
UPDATE: I think I just came up with something better. A bag filter like this http://www.aquaticeco.com/subcategories/3102/Mesh-Filter-Bags or this http://www.aquaticeco.com/subcategories/1480/Polyester-Mesh-Bags Fixed to the OD of a PVC pipe in that same barrel that I had planned up for the screens.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 05:38 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Nov 10th, '12, 09:27
Posts: 2667
Gender: Male
Are you human?: maybe
Location: Vic
I dont like the bag idea.
ive tried to use a home made "bag" style filter using cloth, to try filter my scoria dust out.
it was a massive failure.
it started well, but when the walls started to get lined with gunk, it started to back up and the whole bag became full of water that couldnt escape, it started flowing back out of the bag.

with your much lower water rate, it may work fine, but like the screen, once there is a thin film on it, the water wil try to find another way to go - not a probem with pressured tanks, but im sure your not doing a pressure filter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 05:52 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
Yavimaya wrote:
I dont like the bag idea.
ive tried to use a home made "bag" style filter using cloth, to try filter my scoria dust out.
it was a massive failure.
it started well, but when the walls started to get lined with gunk, it started to back up and the whole bag became full of water that couldnt escape, it started flowing back out of the bag.


Do you know about how many microns it was? Did you clean it often? How large was it? Did you have a RFF or large solid removal device upstream of it? I think that dust may be fundamentally different and more abundant than <100 micron fish waste

Yavimaya wrote:
with your much lower water rate, it may work fine, but like the screen, once there is a thin film on it, the water wil try to find another way to go - not a probem with pressured tanks, but im sure your not doing a pressure filter.


I was planning to build it into a 5 gallon barrel so that if it were to get clogged and overflow, it would just bypass the filter. I figure it'll work just like a mat filter or screen but the water will have much much more surface area to escape through. Bioslime is my concern though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 06:00 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Nov 10th, '12, 09:27
Posts: 2667
Gender: Male
Are you human?: maybe
Location: Vic
it was for dust, so no RFF, etc wouldnt have helped.
it is hard to say the microns, it was just made out of fabric i had around.
the weave was fairly sparce though, it wasnt like suit material or anything.
as far as cleaning goes, i did clean it once fairly quicky and it seemed to do nothing, a few hours later it was already too late. it was a large bag (held prob. 30-40 litres) so i coudnt pull it out of my sump, so i couldnt clean it the second time.

Im sure this thing wont be as bad as mine though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 06:07 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
Yavimaya wrote:
it was for dust, so no RFF, etc wouldnt have helped.
it is hard to say the microns, it was just made out of fabric i had around.
the weave was fairly sparce though, it wasnt like suit material or anything.
as far as cleaning goes, i did clean it once fairly quicky and it seemed to do nothing, a few hours later it was already too late. it was a large bag (held prob. 30-40 litres) so i coudnt pull it out of my sump, so i couldnt clean it the second time.

Im sure this thing wont be as bad as mine though.


Sounds like it collected a lot of dust! You probably had pounds and pounds of dust to clear out. I really think comparing that suspended solids after RFF treatment is apples and oranges.

I made a quick sketch for you:

Image

Drawing kind of sucks but you can see that the bag is suspended within a large diameter pipe with a reducer to support the mouth of the bag. Lots of holes in the pipe to let water out into the main chamber. If the bag becomes impassable, the water just flows out the top. I may have to put the outlet pipe at the bottom, not sure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 06:35 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Nov 10th, '12, 09:27
Posts: 2667
Gender: Male
Are you human?: maybe
Location: Vic
That looks like a better design.
little things can make a difference. :)


I didnt end up getting anything at all out with my filter, it clogged too quickly. - there was atleast a 25l bucket worth on the bottom when i pulled that bed apart months later.
as you said, you will be sending much less to it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 06:56 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
I think it has to go like this:

Image

The equalization of the pressure on both sides of the filter bag due to the output being so high in that first diagram would be no bueno.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 07:28 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
You may get half a day out of your bag if your lucky. I once tried a soakwell sock in a 44g barrel, a total and utter failure and that was a big bag. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 07:42 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
Sleepe wrote:
You may get half a day out of your bag if your lucky. I once tried a soakwell sock in a 44g barrel, a total and utter failure and that was a big bag. :)


Damnit! Can you tell me about your methods? Was it after a RFF? How did the flow work? I wonder how people tackle this issue...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 07:55 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Nov 10th, '12, 09:27
Posts: 2667
Gender: Male
Are you human?: maybe
Location: Vic
mostly the issue is sorted with a normal growbed between RFF and DWC around here.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 08:12 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
I wonder if that's how they handle it commercially too? Perhaps they use sieve or drum filters?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 08:28 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
LETTUCE wrote:
Sleepe wrote:
You may get half a day out of your bag if your lucky. I once tried a soakwell sock in a 44g barrel, a total and utter failure and that was a big bag. :)


Damnit! Can you tell me about your methods? Was it after a RFF? How did the flow work? I wonder how people tackle this issue...


No it was one of my stupider ideas where I pumped straight from the pond back into the pond. I thought the large surface area would be able to handle the relatively small flow, about 2000lph. :roll:

With filtration on AP systems its not like just smack a cartridge in the flow line (unless you have an awful lot) you have to get the particles to clump or stick to something, or both. There was a diagram on the previous page of an upflow bead filter, they work quite well. In fact if you had lots of money you could upflow through Kaldnes with a slow flow and just knock the crap off it on a regular basis (think beads are better though). :)

Edit

I am surprised no one has improved the efficiency of an RFF by putting something in the way of the outward flow to create this effect.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 08:35 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
Sleepe wrote:
No it was one of my stupider ideas where I pumped straight from the pond back into the pond. I thought the large surface area would be able to handle the relatively small flow, about 2000lph. :roll:
)


Okay well that kind of gives me hope tbh. I'll be taking out the big solids with a RFF first. Plus I think my body of water and number of fish will be far far less than yours. 120 gallons (450 liters) for the fish tank.

How big are your fishies? How much water do you have in that pond?

Quote:
There was a diagram on the previous page of an upflow bead filter, they work quite well. In fact if you had lots of money you could upflow through Kaldnes with a slow flow and just knock the crap off it on a regular basis (think beads are better though)


I'll check um out!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 09:11 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Sep 15th, '07, 09:09
Posts: 3712
Location: WA
Gender: Male
About 7-8 kl free water, 800l bottlecaps in a spa running Constant flood, 200l bottlecaps in pots running constant flow, a 40-60l useless (well fairly usless) mechanical filter.
Unknown number of goldfish of various sizes (a lot are black) and unknown number of gilgies. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 18th, '14, 09:25 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '14, 09:50
Posts: 66
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Illinois
Sleepe wrote:
About 7-8 kl free water, 800l bottlecaps in a spa running Constant flood, 200l bottlecaps in pots running constant flow, a 40-60l useless (well fairly usless) mechanical filter.
Unknown number of goldfish of various sizes (a lot are black) and unknown number of gilgies. :)


Sounds like an awesome setup! Not quiiiite the same scale as mine though :lol:. Mine is 17x smaller than yours. Even with a 44g filter, that's only 1:52 of your volume ratio. Plus I'm willing to bet that you had a fair bit of suspended solids ready to jump into that filter bag as soon as you gave them a chance. If you ran that bag for a while I bet that you'd start getting a bit more time in between filter bag changes. I could be 1000% wrong though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.095s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]