⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 08:23 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jun 26th, '10, 20:46
Posts: 2938
Images: 51
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Nope! I'm a machine.
Location: Dowerin, WA
World needs food system overhaul

I dont agree with the need to use GM food and I dont think they know about aquaponics. Perhaps we could point the leader of the study, Professor John Beddington, to this site.


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 08:33 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Dec 5th, '09, 03:00
Posts: 1237
Location: Houston, Texas
Gender: Male
Are you human?: No, The Missing Link
Location: Houston Texas
I agree governments should reduce subsidies....I disagree with pretty much the rest of it - especially the part about my government changing my diet!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 08:37 
You can access the full report and findings... as well as background material here...

http://www.bis.gov.uk/foresight/our-wor ... blications

It's all very well meaning... and nothing that hasn't been raised/researched/discussed before....

But world hunger isn't really a matter of food production... it's a matter of distribution... and the politics of trade and business....

Many countries... particularly the bastion of "free trade"... the US.... subsidise farmers to either grow, or dump food and livestock... to manipulate supply and demand... thus pricing...

And gloablisation and international political stratagies aint going to change that scenario....


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 08:41 
Here's the full report pdf... http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/bispartner ... report.pdf


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 08:49 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
yea, what Rupe said.

Always gets me when people insist that organic and intensive gardening methods can't feed the world. Well the industrial methods aren't doing it either, instead they are tending to make at least the Americans FAT by getting us to pay for and eat more calories that we don't need instead of using them to feed the people who do need them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 25th, '11, 09:28 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 3rd, '09, 06:50
Posts: 956
Location: Bullsbrook
Gender: Male
Are you human?: 01011001011001010111
Location: Western Australia
World needs a lower population, less people = less land needed for food/resource production = more of the natural environment left intact = healthier more sustainable planet.

Just about every major problem this planet faces can be traced back the current plague of Homo sapiens.

Developing nations need education and developed nations need to unshackle them selves from the population growth = economic growth mantra, economically speaking we need to think out side the box for sustainable solutions.

my 2 cents :flower:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 26th, '11, 02:48 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Oct 24th, '10, 17:16
Posts: 338
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Some Time
Location: Chonburi Thailand
I agree with you all.
Here in thailand, my country produce much of food.
But now food become more expensive.
Dry season become longer, lack of water and some time too much water,flood.
Land become more expensive.

I think AP is the future for this country too.

Cheers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 26th, '11, 07:58 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Jul 1st, '10, 21:20
Posts: 324
Location: Discovery Coast Qld
Gender: Male
Are you human?: occasionally
Location: Qld.
Simo wrote:
World needs a lower population, less people = less land needed for food/resource production = more of the natural environment left intact = healthier more sustainable planet.

Just about every major problem this planet faces can be traced back the current plague of Homo sapiens.

Developing nations need education and developed nations need to unshackle them selves from the population growth = economic growth mantra, economically speaking we need to think out side the box for sustainable solutions.

my 2 cents :flower:

Totally agree
Increasing food production was part of the cause of the problem.
The "Green Revolution" code for industrialised cheap oil dependant agriculture started all this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Revolution
Localising organic food production is the only sustainable solution and area can only support the amount of people it can feed.
We will need to return to about 2 billion people and start again.
How is the difficult part.
Under the current model the ability to pay the high food prices and the size of your army will decide who eats.
The inevitable rise in oil price and potential food and land being used to produce bio-diesel will speed up this process.
Along with diminishing reliable water supplies and predictable climates.
Another really good article on "The Oil We Eat"
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2004/02/0079915


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.089s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]