All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: bio fuels
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 13:26 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Aug 29th, '07, 15:18
Posts: 751
Location: the moon
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: no
Location: space
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/n ... nol08.html

discuss?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 15:00 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
my view from the very start.

its only carbon neutral if there was

no refining
no chemical fertilization

i think someone also did the math on the land area that would be required...........


sorry, formula does not balance.

from someone that has made just 15L of ethanol i can tell you that it useds about 4kg of propane to do.............then there was the CO2 released by fermentation.......................

and my starting components were refined sugar..............


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 15:28 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Aug 29th, '07, 15:18
Posts: 751
Location: the moon
Gender: None specified
Are you human?: no
Location: space
heh my view exactly.
on a large scale it's not quite so bad, but it's still terrible.
bio diesels aren't much better either.
why even bother with the combustion engine. focus energies on electric cars. superior to combustion in everyway except distance, which i'd like to see solved by super capacitors.
drive through recharge and no need to dispose of them once a year like batteries. less weight as well


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 17:19 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
why not ditch hybrid / hydrogen hybrid and just go electrical?

again, watch "who killed the electric car" available from all good P2P sites ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 17:22 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Aug 24th, '06, 19:46
Posts: 6604
Location: sunbury
Gender: Male
Are you human?: no
Location: sunbury
steve wrote:
why not ditch hybrid / hydrogen hybrid and just go electrical?

again, watch "who killed the electric car" available from all good P2P sites ;)

I tried an electric car once but the extension cords kept getting tangled :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 18:19 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
boom-boom :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 19:30 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Feb 8th, '07, 11:18
Posts: 975
Location: Buckhead, The City of Atlanta, The State of Georgia, The Republic of the United States of America
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yes
Location: United States
I think this, and other reports like it, suffer from myopia. The point is really not to have one new technology that is a magic bullet to replace cheap hydrocarbons. Secure energy supplies can only be obtained from a diversity of sources, so there is no single point of failure. So biofuels, wind, geothermal, solar, the new nano-antannae currently being hyped, hydro, others I'm forgetting/don't know of, and even classical gas and hydrocarbon production all have a part to play in the future.

With that said, it has always been my view that the strength of bio fuels is the waste products of other processes. Almost any product that was once a plant or an animals can be converted into some kind of bio fuel.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '08, 20:57 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Jan 14th, '08, 17:42
Posts: 427
Location: La Rochelle
Gender: Male
The best way to produce biofuel is with sea phytoplankton.
Up to 60-80% of pure oil per kilo on a 1/50th of the land surface.
And useable in factory chimneys to extract CO² from the outgoing gases.
The thing is to have low consumption equipement more than finding a way to continue the wastes by excess that we do now, when we can divide by ten the energy input needed for anythnig with the technologies that we already have. Spacecrafts are the most efficient things made by men, except the carb they need to take off.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.028s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]