⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Understanding food miles
PostPosted: Jun 20th, '12, 09:55 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
I've commented a few times in the past about these supposed commercial aquaponics businesses that have high energy consumption systems, growing leafy green crops under lights indoors and the fact that it just doesn't add up to a net saving just because it's produced locally.. Of course these businesses love to try and label themselves as "green" saving food miles, and saving the planet...

I read a couple of interesting articles recently on this very subject..

This article suggests that:

Quote:
Their results show that transportation accounts for only 11 percent of the carbon emissions caused by food production. Of that amount, so-called upstream transportation of inputs to the farm (or to farm suppliers) accounts for some seven percent of overall food-related transportation emissions. Most notably, perhaps, final delivery—the trip from the farm to the supermarket—accounts for just 4 percent of total food emissions on average. By comparison, production of the food accounts for 83 percent of the carbon emissions, with warehousing and wholesale and retail operations making up the small remainder.


Quote:
An extreme example of this effect can be seen in farm products shipped to Europe or the United States from New Zealand. Several New Zealand researchers crunched the numbers to show that the carbon emissions from producing and delivering lamb, apples, and dairy products from New Zealand to the United Kingdom were actually lower than the emissions from the same foods produced locally in the United Kingdom. Why? The study no doubt sought to put New Zealand goods in the best possible light, but the numbers are still compelling: As these researchers demonstrated, not only do New Zealand farmers use less chemical fertilizer than their British counterparts, but also more than half of New Zealand's electricity derives from hydropower, which produces no carbon emissions. Those two differences, as it turns out, are enough to offset the emissions from 11,000 miles of ocean shipping.


So the transport from farm to supermarket only accounts for an average of 4% of the energy going into the product.. :think:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jun 20th, '12, 11:16 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Thanks EB, interesting info.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 20th, '12, 13:29 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mar 24th, '10, 13:00
Posts: 5086
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Daughters think not
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia
What if the farm is on the other side of the world :dontknow:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jun 20th, '12, 15:24 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced

Joined: May 30th, '11, 16:27
Posts: 1109
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Baldivis WA
NZ to UK is the other side of the world


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.093s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]