Backyard Aquaponics
A place to discuss aquaponics

Wow, now thats global!

I couldn't see it

本上采用无土栽培的人工基质培、水培及气培，使种植系统的构建简易化，空间化与管理方便化，通过各种种植系统的构建，形成了以微生物分解，植物根系吸收的循环水系统，让水资源的利用率得以最大化的提高，让水在养殖及种植系统中进行闭锁型的循环。而且养殖与种植技术采用高度集约与自动控制管理外，农民养鱼与种菜就变得极为简单与高效。
这两种有机结合的新型种植系统，除了让农民更为便捷高效地进行农事生产外，利用该技术生产的蔬菜可以很容易地达到绿色有机无公害的要求，使农产品的市场效益得以大大提高，是常规化肥或农药土耕栽培价格的成倍以上，而且在水培或气培等营养液水环境下，生产变得简单，生长变得快速，品质还得以大幅度的提高。在农田或大棚规划共生系统时，从生态循环及可分解物质的平衡关系来说，一般以养殖桶的面积与种植面积以1：5为佳，这样基本上可以把工厂化高密度养殖过程中的排污处理掉，为鱼的生长创造一个适合的水质环境及生态环境。
通过模式的创新，让我国及世界的农业，真正实现有机耕作，特别的蔬菜，更需用有机绿色产品所取代，否则人类的健康与未来环境，将成为人类持续发展的主要障碍，基于此，在我国推广这种基于种植业与养殖业又超于常规的综合性鱼菜共生系统将具有战略性的发展意义，它除了提升农业产业水平外，更重要的是为我国创建生态环保绿色的城市与国家作出农业生产上的巨大贡献。
this is the writing I got on the page - but I saw his growbeds on the site.

Ah, the very ancient tibetian text,explaining HE WHO HAS NO AP IS WA@$ER

Takes a bit to load up but the picture shows about half way down on the right hand of first page? What they growing? bamboo shoots or water cress?

it is talking about the 'high-tech' solution for China's farmers. It says that the best ratio of the fish tank surface area to growbed area is 1:5.

Flattering, but I'm betting that Joel didn't give permission for his photo to be used. By US law, that's copyright infringement, but good luck getting them to stop using your copyrighted material.

By Chinese Law that's called "Capitalist Opportunism"

I wonder if they look at it that way if you do the same to them... hmmmm - it would be okay if they refrenced his pic, or had a link back to here

For one you would have to be bi-lingual to even notice the dam ting i think some one that could talk the stuff should write a letter saying to put up a link to Joel's site

hmmm, no good me doing it as my other languages are of african origin

Peashoots, do they credit Joel?

Understand that the below is from the perspective of US copyright law; I don't have knowledge of International copyright law.

Many folks are of the opinion that if it is on the Internet, it must be free. So they take what they want and use it as they want with no credit, permission or payment to the creator. This is illegal. The copyright-holder may offer material to be freely used, or may choose to require some type of compensation. Credits, a website link, or fees are typical. Copyright is assumed; it does not have to be stated (although Joel has the copyright mark on the bottom of his website pages). However, it is up to the creator to protect the copyright. Lack of effort to protect the copyright will result in its loss, and the material will become public domain. In the US, this is particularly a problem in the art/illustration industry, and also the music industry. My sister is a graphic designer, and has had to enforce her copyrights. She sends the offending party a bill and tells them to pay up or remove the use of her images. So far, they quickly remove the images rather than pay the bill and she accepts that. I get a little annoyed at copyright-infringement since that act impacts my sister's ability to feed her children.

Thats definitely Joels system..... of course, it may ttribute it to him, but we can't read it....

i will talk to them for sure. but please don't use your US law. US law is not the WORLD law yet.

I tried to contact them, but not successful yet.