It isn't hard to fabricate evidence. Commonly used to justify vaccines are the statistics from the early days, yet the moment it is mentioned that polio, (as just one of many expamples) was decreasing in the community BEFORE the vaccines came out, we get told the doctors in those days couldn't diagnose polio properly and so the figures before vaccines were vastly inflated... which means, if true, that polio was NEVER the problem it is made out to have been.
It's also the same 'adjustment' justification we see in Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) scenarios where, when it is pointed out that the hottest year in history was in the 1930's, the temps from back then get adjusted down because the people making measurements back then were not skilled enough to read their thermometers properly.
It's just more bad science, where the data is modified to support the currently accepted 'consensus' thesis, and like AGW, the vaccine issue is not easily addressed because the effects are almost all decades down the track. Aluminium is strongly linked to Alzheimer's so unless we suddenly see teens and young adults getting Alzheimer's, the effects of these vaccines will be paid for by the grandchildren of those being infected... sorry, vaccinated, right now.
Polio vaccine has caused major problems in India last year - AFTER India was declared polio-free, and the variety of illness that comes from the vaccine is much worse than the original polio.
Quote:
Polio Vaccine Campaigns and Increases In Deadly Polio-Like Disease in Children
A paper published earlier this year in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics should have made headlines around the globe, as it estimated there were 47,500 cases of a polio-like condition linked to children in India receiving repeated doses of oral polio vaccine in 2011 alone. The incidence of non-polio Accute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) in India is now 12 times higher than expected and coincides with huge increases in OPV doses being given to children in the quest to “eradicate” wild type polio infection and paralysis.
Researchers reported:
"…while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated."
Added to the dangers of thimerol and aluminium, we now have squalene as an adjuvant - squalene has been strongly linked to 'Gulf War Syndrome' and the dosage in civilian vaccines is MUCH higher than in what the soldiers got.
I am happy to have a debate about such issues, because I have been tracking both Science and the stuff that gets called Science in recent times for several decades. But statements like 'it's completely insane not to vaccinate' are not helpful. Such pejoratives inflame rather than draw useful comment.
Not only are there doubts as to the efficacy of vaccines in general (due to a whole range of factors from manipulated data, poor QA processes, incorrect usage, and an increasing number of dangerous adjuvants designed to maximise profits for Big Pharma) the advisability of providing them to children is highly doubtful.
Newborns do not have the immune systems they will eventually develop and in fact, many antibodies reaching a newborn's system will suppress rather than enhance the immune response. Giving the vaccine to pregnant women is not a good idea for this and other reasons - it is likely to harm the child's development not improve it. Having a child meet the antibody before the antigen is another factor which can suppress response to that antigen.
And then there's the issue I mentioned above - injecting a flu vaccine is... well, maybe not useless, but unlikely to provide the protection the average person thinks it does - in fact it is more likely the protection they get comes from placebo effects. Because the injection is bypassing the immune system that the body uses to stop viruses and other pathogens, there is no increased immunity for the vaccinated that will stop the flu virus getting in and establishing - the most the vaccine can do is suppress it once it starts floating around the blood stream looking for new territories.
Which means any vaccine dealing with viruses might help reduce the death rate but it has very little effect on transmission - the unvaccinated child is as likely to be at risk from all the vaccinated ones around them as from other unvaccinated children! More so probably because the reliance of parents on the invincibility of the vaccine means they will send their kids to school anyway, where the unvaccinated are more likely to be kept home for care once they show any signs.
Backyard Aquaponics
