All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 06:30 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
I've been doing a fair bit of reading lately on biogas, biomass and other forms of alternative energy. One of the quoted figures is the energy efficiency of a particular method. ie how much energy out after the amount of energy in has been accounted for.

This is all very well to compare different AEs but how do they compare to coal or oil? Does anyone know? Any studies that people can link to? I've tried google and wiki and will return there shortly but I'd appreciate the answer if someone can point me in the right direction.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 06:53 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 10:44
Posts: 3455
Location: Loomberah NSW
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Im a force of nature
Location: I'm right here
Coal-fired electricity runs around 30-45% efficiency for modern power stations, internal combustion engines are more like 20%, but rockets can be 70%! That's just the combustion, ignoring all the energy required to mine/extract, process, and transport the fuel.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 07:51 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Not looking for the energy efficiency in turns of use. I want the energy efficiency in terms of production.

The energy efficiency in terms of use doesn't allow me to compare different ways of getting that energy to use.

So brown coal has an energy value of around 28500kJ/kg. How much does it cost in energy to get it to the powerplant?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 08:06 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 10:44
Posts: 3455
Location: Loomberah NSW
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Im a force of nature
Location: I'm right here
There is no hard number for that, it all depends on how much overburden they had to remove to get to it at the mine, how much explosives they used, whether it gets to the power station on a conveyor, truck or train, how far it has to be transported etc.

I'd call it "lots"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 08:24 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Gunagulla wrote:
There is no hard number for that, it all depends on how much overburden they had to remove to get to it at the mine, how much explosives they used, whether it gets to the power station on a conveyor, truck or train, how far it has to be transported etc.

I'd call it "lots"


I understand that there are a lot of variables but there must be some industry standards. In the absence of averag data I would be more than happy with specific data.

Best of all would be cost of extraction and delivery of brown coal (in terms of energy) in the Latrobe Valley.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 08:32 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 10:44
Posts: 3455
Location: Loomberah NSW
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Im a force of nature
Location: I'm right here
That could be a difficult figure to find... but they'd have to include all the energy for pumping water out of the mines too!

I think Hazelwood power station is the least efficient in Oz, and amongst the least efficient in the world, just as far as combustion is concerned, adding the extraction of the coal isn't going to help.

I'd suggest contacting Giles Parkinson at RenewEconomy, he may be able to point you in the right direction.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 08:38 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
I wonder how much energy could be harnessed by burning down the Monsanto factory?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 13:16 
A posting God
A posting God

Joined: Nov 10th, '12, 09:27
Posts: 2667
Gender: Male
Are you human?: maybe
Location: Vic
enough to make it worth trying, im sure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 13:25 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
Have you thought about composting orange pulp? :dontknow: :)


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 15:10 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
:upset:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 2nd, '13, 15:39 
Legend Member
Legend Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 27th, '11, 15:27
Posts: 744
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Bunbury, Australia
My worms got rid of a batch of pulp, or maybe that was the start of the worm farm going bad?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.034s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]