All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 00:36 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 22nd, '06, 00:28
Posts: 12757
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES- kinda
Location: Melb Vic OZ
It has been a good discussion indeed!

I think you summed it up nicely here

Quote:
So I choose fish that can live with ice over the water and they grow slower and take two years to grow out.


Let me paraphrase that to "the ultimate efficiency is using what you have (daylength & temps) to grow what you can"

There are fish for all temps and plants for all seasons.

I said as much in a post to my system thread (or the jade fungus thread) Many of my fish problems have come about by trying to keep the jades in a location that has temperatures not ideal for them sometimes.

I've learnt my lesson of fighting nature ;)

that is not to say that slight "outside natures specs" can not be run with radient solar heating.....................i never DID learn from my lessons ;) LOL


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 05:15 
In need of a life
In need of a life
User avatar

Joined: Aug 13th, '06, 14:43
Posts: 1854
Gender: Male
Location: Narre Warren, VIC,OZ Earth
look forward to seeing some great results doug :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 06:55 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Dec 21st, '06, 15:57
Posts: 486
Location: melbourne
Gender: Male
Quote:
njh did some calcs showing that the heat exchanger will be useless. Great job on conduction and convection calcs. I have experienced better results in 'real life', so what was the missing factor? I think the major heat transfer mode in effect is radiant energy from direct sunlight.


I don't recall which heating calcs these were, but from memory weren't we looking at the water-water HE in the tank rather than something in the sun?

Quote:
njh did not include this. His model was a heat exchanger working from the temperature of the space around it (working on room heat).


Probably, sunlight hitting a suitable surface acts like a current source, whereas air temp is like a voltage source.

Quote:
That lead to very low numbers. In fact, today is sunny and I can not keep my hand on the flat black tubes of my exchanger. They are directly heated by radiant sun light and therefore are not isolated by stagnent air near the tube surface. The best model for the heat exchanger has radiant energy as the major component. The exchanger will still be a small effect on 3000 gallons, but it will be much more effective than the room heat model.


If you're talking about the pipe near the roof of your room, the surface area of that looked too small to me - assuming 500W/m^2 and 2m^2 surface area you're only collecting 2kW. I think to heat your tank you're going to need a much larger surface area, or some kind of concentrating system.

I think my concern is more about $/W than efficiency - I'd rather spend $100 on 100m^2 of 20% efficient heat collection than $100 on 2m^2 of 80% efficient heat collection.

Quote:
Pardon the techy talk, but it illustrates how discussion benefits everyone envolved.


Yes, it is the basis of progress!

Quote:
I established the first 'realtime Hardware in loop' simulation facility for powertrain engineering at DaimlerChrysler. I still have a contract to go back and teach simulation 8 weeks a year at DaimlerChrysler. The simulation has vastly improved the efficiency of testing the powertrain controller algorithms. They now have 14 $500K HIL simulators and the engineers are now using simulation throughtout powertrain engineering. I think less problems are getting out to the customer, so I earned my keep. Very Happy


Good stuff! Improved simulation always improves productivity, and it's one important reason why even if cheap energy disappears, we'll be using computers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 07:45 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Nov 23rd, '06, 22:37
Posts: 504
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Location: Michigan, USA
njh, why would you want a bulky heat exchanger? No spare room in my building, so small, hi efficient is much better than large low efficient.

Oh yah, you are in a warm place where exchangers can sit outside.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 10:44 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Dec 21st, '06, 15:57
Posts: 486
Location: melbourne
Gender: Male
Doug_Basberg wrote:
njh, why would you want a bulky heat exchanger? No spare room in my building, so small, hi efficient is much better than large low efficient.


No, it's a question of monetary efficiency. No point in spending lots of money on something that produces less. Let's take 5MJ/m^2 as your winter daily average. Then my proposed design would generate 100MJ on average, your design would generate 8MJ on average. Given a choice between 100 and 8 for your dollar, which would you choose?

If money is no object, you want to ship your product or you are space constrained, then higher efficiency makes sense. That's not true of most people :) It is in fact quite straightforward to improve the efficiency to 50% by spending just a little more - you might like to think about how.

Quote:
Oh yah, you are in a warm place where exchangers can sit outside.


That's a mistaken logic. All the heat that goes into your greenhouse ends up in your greenhouse. Thus putting a heat exchanger in the greenhouse merely moves that heat around. If you are serious about solar heating you will need to put your collector outside! Once you've made that leap you realise that pumping water around in little black pipes is the wrong solution.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 10th, '07, 20:38 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Nov 3rd, '06, 01:30
Posts: 3131
Location: Cochranville, Pennsylvania USA
Gender: Female
Are you human?: yes
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
But if you move the heat around in your greenhouse to a place (like a large mass of water) where you can better store the heat overnight, isn't that a good thing, too?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 11th, '07, 01:17 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Nov 23rd, '06, 22:37
Posts: 504
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Location: Michigan, USA
Exactly Janet. The daytime temps do not need augmenting. But the heat stored in the day in the water is very valuable circulating thru the growbeds at night. :salute:

Another consideration is keeping the fish tank water warm enough for the fish to grow. My large concrete tank is not in the sun and will tend to average day/nite temp of room plus the effect of a large surface area below ground picking up ground temp. Temp changes in such a large heat capacitor will be very slow. Anything I can do to add heat is good (all year here - no chance of overheating I think).

njh, you mentioned your design. I do not remember seeing it. Could you help me locate it. Maybe something there to improve my heat exchanger?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 11th, '07, 06:17 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Dec 21st, '06, 15:57
Posts: 486
Location: melbourne
Gender: Male
Quote:
But if you move the heat around in your greenhouse to a place (like a large mass of water) where you can better store the heat overnight, isn't that a good thing, too?


Sure but I thought you lived in cold, dark places? Such places will not get enough sun during the day to store enough heat for the night. So you'll end up having to heat with other energy. As I keep saying, I'm not doubting the idea can work, I'm doubting the idea is economically a good idea. I could leave a 100m roll of black polypipe in the sun and produce water too hot to touch, but the actual amount of heat I collect will be worth less than the losses and pumping costs and certainly not enough to heat my tank to any appreciable level.

Come on Doug, you're an engineer, do the maths and show that your system can collect enough to keep itself warm. From your pictures I estimated you have about 2m^2 of collector area, which might collect 5kWh a day. Is that going to be enough? A lighted match is quite hot to touch, but it's not going to keep a GH warm overnight.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 11th, '07, 08:09 
Legend Member
Legend Member

Joined: Nov 23rd, '06, 22:37
Posts: 504
Location: Michigan
Gender: Male
Location: Michigan, USA
njh,

5kwh is running a 1000 watt heater for 5 hours.

I will take that heat day after day for little cost because I run my pump under computer control at a duty cycle that gathers the heat into the tank at a reasonable cost in electricity. We pay $0.10/ kwh, so it is only $0.50 per day or $15/mo or $180/yr (less with cloudy days).

I am surprised you do not think 5 kwh is worth collecting.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Feb 11th, '07, 08:27 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Dec 21st, '06, 15:57
Posts: 486
Location: melbourne
Gender: Male
I do not think you will collect 5kWh (I was using 100% collector efficiency, which is very doubtful - 25% is more likely with an open air black pipe), and I don't think it will prevent you needing supplimentary heat. If you are just interested in collecting a little bit for show, then fine, but I would rather aim for getting the majority of my heating from the sun.

I could be wrong, but you haven't presented any calculations at all yet, so it's all conjecture. (Am I right about 2m^2? Am I right about 2.5kWh/m^2 day mid winter? what is your heat losses?)

If you have computer control, why aren't you measuring the actual heat output? My heating system records MJt provided by the system, MJe used, and various performance measures based on fish and plant growth rates. What you don't measure you can't improve.

I would be aiming for a few hundred kWh a day if I were in your climate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.043s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]