⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Jul 29th, '13, 10:18 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sep 8th, '12, 18:48
Posts: 267
Location: Stratham
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Bunbury
Cheers Seamonkey, used to the pump running continuously.

So I thought I'd see were my flow in my Trout tank sits in comparison to PLJ quote just as an experiment

Quote:
I have had a look but can't find the particular reference but, as I recall, a water speed equivalent to between 0.5 and 1.5 of the fish's length per second was the recommended target speed.


My tank is 2.63m in diameter so I timed a floating milk bottle lid to see how long it took to do a revolution . It was measured 100mm in from the edge of the tank so 2.4m x 3.14 = 7.536m. It took 70sec for 1 rev, so 7.5m/70sec = 0.107m/sec of water velocity

For the above quoted velocities I used a 300mm fish for my experiment. 0.5-1.5 equates 150mm and 450mm which is 0.15m/sec and 0.45m/sec

All I can say is I pity the poor fish that have to swim at 0.45m/sec continuously.

In comparison my Silver perch tank (same size) took 120sec/rev = 0.0625m/sec

Before I started this little experiment I actually thought I had heaps of flow for the trout. Not that I plan on changing anything. But its interesting to see where I sit with in those spec's.

This is what it looked like with last years fish, it gives you an idea of my water velocity



Muzza


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Jul 29th, '13, 10:41 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 16th, '12, 11:43
Posts: 1444
Location: 'Kooinda Bindi', Muckenburra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: family Hominidae
Location: deep in the bush north of Perth, WA, Oz
Muz1970, I may have remembered the flow rate figures incorrectly but they are thereabouts. The article also stated that flow rates at the surface and at the bottom of a raceway are less than the central flow due to friction/surface tension etc, and the fish could alternate between these zones.

I think it is great that you conducted your experiment. Perhaps you could repeat it with an object in suspension rather than floating on the surface since I think that would give you a truer water speed figure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 29th, '13, 14:17 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
I remember Ryan posting something about keeping an even flow rate through the fish tank. Ill have to revisit his thread to find it again.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 30th, '13, 04:19 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sep 8th, '12, 18:48
Posts: 267
Location: Stratham
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Bunbury
PLJ, I'll give it a go when I get back from work. I imagine it to be a bit tricky getting something to stay half way in the water column. It will be interesting to see the comparison.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 30th, '13, 06:31 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Apr 7th, '13, 20:30
Posts: 1664
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yup
Location: Perth hills.
Hiya Muz, how about half filling the bottle with water? Keen to see the results.
That looks like quite some water speed in yr tank, is it like that all the time?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jul 30th, '13, 18:54 
Bordering on Legend
Bordering on Legend
User avatar

Joined: Sep 8th, '12, 18:48
Posts: 267
Location: Stratham
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Bunbury
Hey Skeggley, I'll give it a go mate, and yes that's my normal constant water flow through my Trout tank

Muzza


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 6th, '13, 02:36 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 16th, '12, 11:43
Posts: 1444
Location: 'Kooinda Bindi', Muckenburra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: family Hominidae
Location: deep in the bush north of Perth, WA, Oz
Troutman wrote:
Fry are generally fed up to 10% body weight per day whilst fully grown fish 0.6% at average growing temps. A fish of 100 - 200gms only needs to be fed 1% of its body weight per day.

I have reduced the amount of feed my trout get each day on the basis of your advice, and also because my FT nitrites were spiking at the previous rate of 2% of body weight. The latter issue pertains to my filtration, though, not so much to what the fish can process.

A fish of 100-200g may only need to be fed 1% of its body weight per day, Troutman, but do you limit your 100-200g trout to that amount of food?

Troutman wrote:
I have been selling 450gm plus trout into the local restaurants for over a month now so there is no reason why your fish couldn't be this size or bigger (I have mine at a much higher stocking rate than yours).
I have modeled this scenario and I cannot see how it is possible for my fish to achieve this size in the time available, based on the feeding rates stated above. Even if fed at a full 10% of their body weight from the time I received the fingerlings through until they reached 100g, and then at 1% thereafter, the earliest my fish could achieve a weight of 450g would be 29 Sep. (Your fish achieved this weight by late June!) My calculation generously allows for a starting weight of 50g, which is most unlikely since, by my reckoning, the fingerlings were in the 4-5 inch fork length range when received on 8 May, which equates to 40-65 fish/kg or 15-25g each. (http://books.google.com.au/books?id=4w9 ... th&f=false) The grow out time for 450g fish is an additional 2 1/2 weeks from a starting size of 15g.

I would really like to grow my trout bigger, faster but I can't see how it can be achieved using your advised feed rates. Someone please let me know where my logic or my arithmetic has failed.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Aug 27th, '13, 14:58 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Apr 16th, '12, 11:43
Posts: 1444
Location: 'Kooinda Bindi', Muckenburra
Gender: Male
Are you human?: family Hominidae
Location: deep in the bush north of Perth, WA, Oz
My system seems settled on a feed rate of 0.8-0.9% of mean trout body weight*, which for today works out to a 500g. I add an increment each day as they grow, currently 6g/day, so tomorrow they will receive 506g, and so on. The fish clearly want more feed but I have to be cruel to be kind since, each time I have bumped up their feed past a critical point, the system has 'hit the wall' and I have lost a couple. I can throw the fish 250g of 7mm pellets and the lot will be gone in 3 seconds of thrashing and splashing. This is a long way from feeding them all they can eat in 5 minutes!



* Assumes a 1:1 feed conversion rate and that the mean weight of trout, as calculated by weighing three fish last month, is close enough to be useable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.034s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]