⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: May 13th, '12, 23:25 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Apr 9th, '12, 01:06
Posts: 209
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes!
Location: Wanneroo , W.A.
Gday i have a question for everybody,
i was just wondering if there is any pro's or cons to the fish of you ran a system that constantly makes the fish swim? :think:
eg.lap pools , constant currents in FT's


my system at the moment has a constant current and i have seen the SP resting near an air stone. i am thinking the current must be weaker at that point ? ( my ft has a current like a cyclone weaker at the top going in circles and has submersable pump at the bottom taking water out then giving it back eventually on top ) . the water temp was around 17 degrees when i saw them do this , mybe its too cold for them.

Anyways i am really just after the pros and cons of having the FT set up like that .

cheers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: May 14th, '12, 01:11 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Nov 17th, '11, 18:21
Posts: 219
Images: 0
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Albury
I remember seeing a number of photos of trout from members that looked rather fat compared to other trout i've caught. ie deep belly
Do fish need excersise?
Do trout taste fatty from a AP systems? :dontknow:

Lyndon


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 14th, '12, 09:22 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mar 12th, '06, 07:56
Posts: 17803
Images: 4
Location: Perth
Gender: Male
Blog: View Blog (1)
I think it's more a case of people force feeding their fish.. :lol:

Different fish species have different "lifestyles". Barramundi like to sit and wait quietly in still water before lunging out at their prey, trout swim quite a lot in fast flowing streams (often).. :dontknow:


Top
 Profile Personal album  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 14th, '12, 09:23 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Apr 9th, '12, 01:06
Posts: 209
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes!
Location: Wanneroo , W.A.
is that why the trout like to jump out of tanks then ?

and silver perch ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 02:40 

Joined: May 20th, '12, 02:33
Posts: 1
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Troglodyte
Location: Missouri, USA
I grew up next to a Conservation Department trout farm, and from fingerling, to being stocked in the river, they are never exposed to anything but constant moving water. I always assumed that was an essential part of everyones set up when i read about people raising trout, so I obviously haven't researched your methods a whole lot.

Sure trout will do ok in still water, but lake trout are never as big as river trout in my experience, and healthy trout don't swim downstream...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 07:05 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 22nd, '10, 13:22
Posts: 123
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: York Western Australia
I saw a doco on tv once where they proved keeping the water moving made fish grow faster and healthier and not so fatty. These were salt water fish but I figure trout would be the same


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 08:12 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '06, 07:39
Posts: 1162
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
Gender: Male
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
oseois wrote:
Sure trout will do ok in still water, but lake trout are never as big as river trout in my experience, and healthy trout don't swim downstream...


I would say that more larger trout come from lakes or estuaries than rivers and in many cases the larger fish caught in rivers are ones that move up from the sea on spawning runs. Once they have swum upstream and done their business they turn around and head straight back down and reside wherever the greatest food supply is. The world record trout were all caught from lakes and although the record brown trout in Australia came from a river back in 1887 there have been numerous catches of lake fish only just shy of that mark over the last 100 odd years.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 09:10 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Apr 9th, '12, 01:06
Posts: 209
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes!
Location: Wanneroo , W.A.
johnfenn wrote:
I saw a doco on tv once where they proved keeping the water moving made fish grow faster and healthier and not so fatty. These were salt water fish but I figure trout would be the same



hey john
i would love to see that doco , any idea on what its name was ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 10:21 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor

Joined: Oct 22nd, '10, 13:22
Posts: 123
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: York Western Australia
It was called Thalassa a weekly tv series that goes to various areas around the world and shows how people live. These guys were farming ocean fish in a land based setup, pumping sea water thro the tanks. It was in Barbados or somewhere in the West Indies. There biggest problem interesting to us was in getting rid of the fish waste that collected in the bottom of the tanks. By swirling the water the waste collected in the centre where it was tapped off and trucked away. They also by accident found that swirling the water made bigger fish faster, because they had to swim against that current.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 16:18 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
It depends on the species of fish. Many salmonids prefer a current to swim against and will be healthier, grow faster, better food conversion ratio, etc. than fish in still water. Others may experience no benefit at all or it may not be good for them.

The only research that I know on the health effects of swimming currents is of trout and salmon. All the studies found positive effects only studies on very small fish with relatively fast currents found adverse effects.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20th, '12, 23:36 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Apr 9th, '12, 01:06
Posts: 209
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes!
Location: Wanneroo , W.A.
johnfenn wrote:
It was called Thalassa a weekly tv series that goes to various areas around the world and shows how people live. These guys were farming ocean fish in a land based setup, pumping sea water thro the tanks. It was in Barbados or somewhere in the West Indies. There biggest problem interesting to us was in getting rid of the fish waste that collected in the bottom of the tanks. By swirling the water the waste collected in the centre where it was tapped off and trucked away. They also by accident found that swirling the water made bigger fish faster, because they had to swim against that current.


ill def look into that this week john , thanks sounds interesting :)

Stuart Chignell wrote:
It depends on the species of fish. Many salmonids prefer a current to swim against and will be healthier, grow faster, better food conversion ratio, etc. than fish in still water. Others may experience no benefit at all or it may not be good for them.

The only research that I know on the health effects of swimming currents is of trout and salmon. All the studies found positive effects only studies on very small fish with relatively fast currents found adverse effects.


so stuart you havent heard of any studies done with silver perch then :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 21st, '12, 05:46 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
LOL!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 22nd, '12, 10:34 
Xtreme Contributor
Xtreme Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Apr 9th, '12, 01:06
Posts: 209
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes!
Location: Wanneroo , W.A.
johnfenn wrote:
It was called Thalassa a weekly tv series that goes to various areas around the world and shows how people live. These guys were farming ocean fish in a land based setup, pumping sea water thro the tanks. It was in Barbados or somewhere in the West Indies. There biggest problem interesting to us was in getting rid of the fish waste that collected in the bottom of the tanks. By swirling the water the waste collected in the centre where it was tapped off and trucked away. They also by accident found that swirling the water made bigger fish faster, because they had to swim against that current.



well i have found the program http://www.sbs.com.au/shows/thalassa/listings/page/ but the actual episode is a bit harder to find . i searched for Barbados and got nothing and i searched for west indies and got something about a guy who messures volcanic activity . does look like a good program though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 22nd, '12, 11:22 
Almost divorced
Almost divorced
User avatar

Joined: Oct 11th, '06, 07:39
Posts: 1162
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
Gender: Male
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
Stuart Chignell wrote:
The only research that I know on the health effects of swimming currents is of trout and salmon. All the studies found positive effects only studies on very small fish with relatively fast currents found adverse effects.


What studies were these Stuart?? All the information i have read states that fish put on weight more readily the less energy they use. This theory is why feed manufacturers recommend increasing the size of the pellet as fish grow larger. ie a fish will gain more feed and expend less energy by eating a larger pellet than having to eat many smaller pellets.

Stuart Chignell wrote:
It depends on the species of fish. Many salmonids prefer a current to swim against and will be healthier, grow faster, better food conversion ratio, etc. than fish in still water. Others may experience no benefit at all or it may not be good for them.


The largest trout I have seen in captivity were in ponds with a small flow thru of water which would have caused negligible flow in the pond. What about the Atlantic Salmon industry? Thats based on growout in cages which may experience some current from tides but not what you would call a constant flow.

As far as Silver Perch go I know the fish in my ponds grow much faster than the fish in tanks though I dont expect that this is the cause of any current, more likely due to having access to some extra natural food and lower stocking densities.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 22nd, '12, 16:28 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Feb 23rd, '07, 03:48
Posts: 6715
Location: Lyonville Victoria
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Lyonville
Troutman there are three theories as to why salmonids do better.

1.One they use less energy when swimming against a current.
2.They develop better metabolism and consequently growth and health through exercise.
3. Both of the above to a greater or lesser degree.

The first is counter intuitive until you realise that it takes a lot of effort to breath water. When fish are still they pump water through their gills and this takes a considerable amount of effort. For us breathing air is no effort at all but water is heavy and has a much lower concentration of oxygen. Fish find it very easy to point themselves into the current and with very small energy efficient movements maintain their position while ram ventilating their gills.

The second is obvious but the consensus is that three is the most likely. However, since this aspect of fish biology has at this stage merely been noted they have yet to quantify it let alone work out the causal mechanisms. Another interesting note was that in taste tests there was a significant quality difference with exercised fish scoring higher in both taste and texture.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.056s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]