⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Nov 19th, '12, 20:25 
Add 20ml per 1000L... test the next day... and repeat if necessary... until you reach your preferred pH..


Top
  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
PostPosted: Nov 19th, '12, 20:27 
A posting God
A posting God
User avatar

Joined: Nov 7th, '12, 19:48
Posts: 2361
Gender: Male
Are you human?: YES
Location: Warragul
I don't know much about aquaponics but here is a nutrient deficiency chart
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 19th, '12, 20:33 
Problem with that "chart"... is it doesn't show iron deficiency... which is by far the most likely to occur with high pH...

Here's a better chart to show the relationship between pH and trace element deficiencies..

Attachment:
nutrient-ph-range.jpg
nutrient-ph-range.jpg [ 23.32 KiB | Viewed 2239 times ]


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 4th, '12, 17:26 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: May 14th, '12, 09:18
Posts: 57
Gender: Male
Are you human?: yes
Location: Esperance, WA
Since my last post on here I started another thread regarding HCl and calculation for CaCO3 neutralisation.

CaCO3-HCl Neutralisation Calculation

In summary I added 820mL of HCl to bring my pH from the mid to 8's to around 7.6.

My system will hopefully now see some plant growth. I am tempted to get new seedlings as I feel that the current ones may be stunted from lack of nutrients. I also feel happier that when I get fish I will have less problems with ammonium spikes now that the pH has been lowered.

Attachment:
File comment: Test results 1/12/12
20121201_203823 (Custom) (2).jpg
20121201_203823 (Custom) (2).jpg [ 118.98 KiB | Viewed 2207 times ]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 4th, '12, 18:43 
orpmoc wrote:
I also feel happier that when I get fish I will have less problems with ammonium spikes now that the pH has been lowered.

Adding fish will undoubtedly result in an ammonia spike.. of some measure.... regardless of the pH...

The pH has nothing to do with the ammonia "spikes"..... other than when the pH <6.0.... which can cause the collapse of the bacterial colony... leading to an ammonia spike...

pH does have a relationship, in conjunction with temperature... to ammonia toxicity... :wink:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 4th, '12, 20:05 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
The good thing is that with trace nitrate levels it will hopefully soften the amm spike and should see your overall nitrification cycle develop a lot smoother.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Dec 4th, '12, 20:36 
Charlie wrote:
The good thing is that with trace nitrate levels it will hopefully soften the amm spike and should see your overall nitrification cycle develop a lot smoother.

Ah... no...

The nitrates wont have any impact whatsoever... on the ammonia... or susbsequent nitrification....

They will provide a base level of nitrates for the plants though... :D


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '13, 18:18 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
I missed your post Rupe. Can you explain cause now Im confused?

My understanding is that because the nitrification process is well under way and having a nitrate colony established (to some degree) would see an amm spike 'softened' from the introduction of fish simply because the beneficial bacteria is already available. :think:

Rough example to get my understanding right..

If I was to throw 20 fish in a virgin system the amm spike and thereafter nitrification process will be somewhat 'harsh' or 'unwelcome' to the fish due to rising amm and nitri levels... both of which are toxic etc etc.. until levels subside and the system becomes balanced.

If I was to put that same 20 fish in a system that already had an active nitrate colony wouldnt the amm produced from those fish be quickly dealt with... hence, 'softening' the toxicity blow... so to speak.

:think:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '13, 19:13 
An established bacterial colony... will certainly deal with any ammonia "spike" more rapidly than an uncycled, or semi established colony...

But the nitrification remains the same.... any ammonia needs to be firstly converted to nitrite.. then to nitrate...

The nitriying bacteria that convert nitrite to nitrate... are inhibited by ammonia... i.e they wont begin processing nitrites until the ammonia has all been converted...

As above... an established colony... will ramp up and deal with the spike more rapidly.... but that's by expansion of the colony... not by the existing prescence of nitrate.. the end product of the existing colony/conversion...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '13, 20:20 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Interesting..

Im glad you pointed that out because Ive never looked at the overall conversions in that way, cheers.

So, until the amm is converted to nitrite there is no benefit in an established nitrate colony... Im assuming because the nitrosomonas still have their work cut out for them as they are doing the conversion of amm to nitrite. So the new amm load is still a load regardless of whats happening at the nitrate end of things because it still needs to be converted. Of course. :cheers:

Although, I think because an established nitrate colony indicates a strong presence of nitrospira so it adds an overall stability and puts the system in a better standpoint whilst dealing with the new amm load. Yes, the nitrate colony is not directly responsible for the amm conversion but it is an end benefit none the less.

Am I getting it? Cheers :thumbleft:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '13, 20:37 
Nitrosomonas are slow reproducers... so it takes a while to convert the ammonia to nitrites...

Nitrospira, on the other hand... can double their population in no time at all... but not while ammonia is present...

So, yeah... an exisiting population.... will rapidly multiple to deal with the "spike"... once the ammonia has been converted...


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Jan 7th, '13, 20:51 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Sweet! thanks Rupe.... who says you kiwi's just sit around all day sucking prawn heads in their jandals. Oh how they were mistaken :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Feb 15th, '13, 11:17 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Hows the system and fishies going Orpmoc :wave1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 1st, '13, 20:37 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: May 6th, '11, 12:06
Posts: 12206
Gender: Male
Location: Northern NSW
Bumpety bump! ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Nov 1st, '13, 21:00 
In need of a life
In need of a life

Joined: Apr 7th, '13, 20:30
Posts: 1664
Gender: Male
Are you human?: Yup
Location: Perth hills.
Interesting about the nitrosomonas and nitrospiras and ammonia.
Yay I learnt something today. :thumbright:
Thanks master bumper Charlie.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.120s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]