RupertofOZ wrote:
Probably true... but actually getting real "financials" from their smaller scale "proof of concept" system... isn't probably possible...
So is the scale of their 2000 Barra "proof of concept" commercially viable?????
As I said, that is a question for them to answer.
RupertofOZ wrote:
That's the question being asked here and other threads.... and everything suggests, from proposed projects.... that the scale required for commercial viability... might be significantly larger...
More than likely so. If you consider that every tank, every hole comes with a labor input and labor in this country add significantly to the costs of any operation. If you are not getting the maximum out of each area for that labor input how can it be viable?
RupertofOZ wrote:
Taylor Made is significantly larger... and seemingly profitable.... but over time... has probably required $6-7 million.. to acheive the current levels of production...
Again I can not speak for Nick on his operations, though like many farmers, production costs are not usually public. Though the DPI publish industry profiles like the following for last year.
http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets ... 9-2010.pdfThe production numbers of barra for the state from that report:
Freshwater fish barramundi, 6 Farms licensed (not necessarily growing), 85,500 tonne produced at an average price of $12.23 per kg. I met with Nick a few weeks back and he advised they produce 600kg per week or 31.2tonne per year (36.5% of the states production).