| Backyard Aquaponics http://byap.backyardmagazines.com/forum/ |
|
| siphon or drain? http://byap.backyardmagazines.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3767 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | novaris [ Jul 8th, '08, 06:25 ] |
| Post subject: | siphon or drain? |
I am about to setup my growbed and I was going to use an auto-siphon but some recent posts are making me wonder if simple timer and drain is better, is there any consensus on this matter? What are the pro's and con's of each? |
|
| Author: | jazzplayermark [ Jul 8th, '08, 06:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
I don't think it's really a matter of one being better than the other. Running a timer probably makes easier to get the siphons working. If you do run a timer, it's easy to get the siphons set up. Just use a siphon tube size that will drain the bed before the next batch of water comes along. |
|
| Author: | TCLynx [ Jul 8th, '08, 08:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
I don't think one is better than the other. Each has benefits and drawbacks. Siphon pros, automatically drains bed when it gets full you can run pump constantly providing extra aeration smaller pump running continuously each bed can flood and drain on it's own schedule splashing of siphon water returning is good aeration Siphon cons, balancing inflow/outflow rates can sometimes be tricky Sometimes it can be fiddly to get a siphon to consistently kick in or kick off sometimes a siphon not kicking in properly will leave a bed flooded long term sometimes a siphon not kicking off properly will leave a bed mostly drained long term Timer/slow drain pros, easy to program (so long as you keep the drain stand pipe accessable to adjust holes, it is easy to adjust drain time) a powerful pump doesn't need to run all the time, saving power Timer/slow drain cons, timers can fail may need extra aeration aside from the pump since it is off most the time. need to find a timer with a short enough cycle time for filling the beds. You decide. |
|
| Author: | EllKayBee [ Jul 8th, '08, 09:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
A smaller continuous flow pump can also be used with a siphon setup, whereas a larger pump is used with a timer and a large volume of water is pumped in a short time There is many ppl on either side of the fence and each point out there setup is best in a friendly sought of bragging way...I have my systems using small continuous flow pumps: - one has bell siphons which have been running for over 18 months efficiently - the other has actuator valves to divert water to single consecutive GBs (6 of 500 litres each) that has been running for over 12 months from memory Joel has used the timer method from the beginning as I understand it and he hasn't reported (m)any malfunctions...copped lots of flack from the better performing continuous flow systems tho |
|
| Author: | EllKayBee [ Jul 8th, '08, 09:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Quote: A smaller continuous flow pump can also be used with a siphon setup ..as TC pointed out |
|
| Author: | aquamad [ Jul 8th, '08, 23:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
I have burnt out too many pumps over the past 2 years with continuous flow In the auto siphons I have used the bed does not have a long enough 'dry' period for me... I am now thinking of a 15 minutes on, 1 hour off cycle - as I will have more GBs soon enough this will be plenty to cycle my water... But it does come down to what you are comfortable with, so go with your gut |
|
| Author: | gemmell [ Jul 9th, '08, 08:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Autosiphons (bell siphons particularly) have massive "Cool" factor. I love the idea of them, and they work fantastic (no moving parts etc). But they're a bugger to set up compared with ye ol' standpipe and timer. I was going to have autosiphons, but the standpipes were just so damn easy that I ended up doing them just to get the system going. So really, it depends on if you want it to be cool or not =) |
|
| Author: | Outbackozzie [ Jul 9th, '08, 20:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
My big system siphons, are now a 'fill at pump startup, drain, and stay drained until the pump next turns off, and restarts.' Essentially a flood and drain, continuous flow system |
|
| Author: | TCLynx [ Jul 9th, '08, 21:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
I like that the siphons, flouts, sump pumps, drain a bed quickly providing the big splash and moving water factor. But since my pump runs continuously, the beds do not get a long period of dry time. So far it doesn't seem to be drowning any plants though of the 6 Rosemary cuttings only one is still surviving. |
|
| Author: | jazzplayermark [ Jul 9th, '08, 21:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
TC I had no luck with either Rosemary or Thyme in my AP system. I haven't yet checked to see the optimum conditions for Rosemary. Thyme likes it pretty dry and I suspect Rosemary may also like it that way. On the other hand, have you tried lemongrass yet? |
|
| Author: | KudaPucat [ Jul 10th, '08, 06:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Simillarly my rosemary is suffering, however I feel it would suffer in a slow drain as well as my autosiphon continuous flow... unless of course the bed was allowed much longer 'dry spells' which would probably result in half my bacteria carking it, and of course those plants sharing the bed who are loving the water... I know it's been said before but beware mint. I planted a peppermint last year, and it seemed it hadn't grown... only it had, just that it was a little below the surface of the scoria... 4 times as big as it seemed on the surface! I still don;t know how it was getting enough light. Hmmm I think I may be a little OT here. |
|
| Author: | Food&Fish [ Jul 10th, '08, 08:24 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Dont worry about the bacteria carking it recently my beds had no water for 36 hrs with no problems |
|
| Author: | novaris [ Jul 10th, '08, 11:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Quote: I have burnt out too many pumps over the past 2 years with continuous flow Aquamad mentioned a problem with pumps, I was under the impression pond pumps were designed to run 24/7 and it was a problem to switch on and off all the time. I was planning continuous pumping for the water flow and air for trout. Since I just got my pump I think I will probably go with serial filling of the beds fed by part flow from the tank overflow. My original thought was that siphon would create more aeration than slow drain but maybe faster filling achieves the same result. |
|
| Author: | KudaPucat [ Jul 10th, '08, 15:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
With the wrong pump you can have problems. Pumps not able to cope with the particulates tend to place a higher load on the motor, and therefore die. Pumps run at or close to their designed pressure also wear faster. with pumps, bigger is better. Restricting the output is more highly recommended than restricting the input, however diverting water back into the tank to reduce flow is by far the nicest for yout pump, and you get free aeration too :-) |
|
| Author: | Chappo [ Jul 10th, '08, 16:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: siphon or drain? |
Different pumps have different designs and uses. A pump designed for continuos use,,say a sponge filter power-head should lastfor YEARS doing that task. My Rio power head has run 24 hours a day 7 days a week for over 10 years. 10 years of almost nil maintenance (impeller got clogged once about 3 years back), pump under duress,,,yep I don't clean my sponge filters often.Thissamepump wouldprobably not like to be switched on andoff on a regular basis. Choose a pump designed for the task,,don't buy cheap,,and always get bigger than you think you need. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|