⚠️ This forum has been restored as a read-only archive so the knowledge shared by the community over many years remains available. New registrations and posting are disabled.

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 11:44 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Jun 5th, '08, 10:58
Posts: 72
Gender: Male
RupertofOZ wrote:
Very few plants take up ammonia directly and perform nitrification within themselves... and none do so from nitrites (AFAIK).... the principle uptake is via nitrates...



Sorry Rupert you're right. This is info that is stuck in my head from my aquatic plant days. It is aquatic plants that prefer ammonia and nitrites to nitrates.


RupertofOZ wrote:
So, like aquaria or RAS tanks... the continual buildup of nitrates could only otherwise be dealt with by water replacement...

The off-gassing of nitrates, via various methods... relates effectively to the conversion of nitrates, by de-nitrification.... to Nitrous Oxide (NO2)... usually, by the very nature of the process.. a reduction process... removing oxygen from the system... anaerobic by name/nature...

In flood & drain growbeds (ebb & flow - to the old hydroponicists)... nitrates are removed by plant uptake... within an aerobic environment...


Totally forgot about the plants here. Good point. However, Live Rock and Deep Sand Beds are both filtration techniques that promote anaerobic areas that deal with nitrate removal. There are also Algae Turf Scrubbers and Macroalgae filters that are essentially saltwater AP systems that do a good job dealing with nitrates.


RupertofOZ wrote:
P.S... trickle towers are generally quite poor nitrifiers... in terms of nitrification to nitrates... often holding nitrite levels for extended periods of time... unless oxygenated to allow the nitrification to nitrates...


The trickle towers I am used to from aquariums and aquaculture are known for oxygenating the system as an additional benefit because of their 'trickling' effect. Of course large scale enclosed filters may be different. But as far as aquaria go people do usually refer to trickle towers/ wet-dry filters as nitrate factories.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
    Advertisement
 
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 12:03 
No... IMO... turnover is important... for bio-filtration and oxygenation...

Higher flow rate/turnover may assist with oxygenation... and may acheive a "slight" increase in bio-filtration...

But ultimately the bio-filtration capacity is limited to the surface area inhabitable by the bacteria... in order to convert to nitrates...

High flow rate filters... such as Bakki Showers do acheive significant results in bio-filtration...

Or more correctly ... in terms of nitrification/de-nitrification... in as much as the highly oxygenated, high flow... effectively de-nitrifies the nitrates into NO2...

Hence their huge popularity amongst Koi keepers, and large aquaria enthusiasts... where the removal of nitrate is as much of a problem as ammonia conversion...

As above... one of the reasons many are abandoning "trickle towers"... is that they're pretty in-effective at nitrate removal... and not much better than other methods at bio-filtration..


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 12:11 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Jun 5th, '08, 10:58
Posts: 72
Gender: Male
You beat me to it Rupert. Right when I was ready to post you answered my question. So in your opinion it is the amount of media which limits the amount of bacteria (and in turn the amount of wastes used) as opposed to the flow rates and the 'feeding' of the bacteria?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 12:17 
Pretty much.... think enclosed RAS... or even aquaria... bead type filters... they're limited...or sized... to process according to the amount of media used... or more correctly the surface area available...

Other factor to consider with flood & drain growbeds... would be that flow rates are limited to the abilty to drain the growbed.. whether that be by siphon or overflow standpipe...

Either, but certainly in relation to siphons... are dependant on flow rate, both for drainage and flood level in the growbed...

Of course you could up-size your piping... but to what point... i.e how much of the growbed area are you prepared to devote to actually just having a drainage mechanism... and for what benefit... :dontknow:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 12:34 
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Joined: Jun 5th, '08, 10:58
Posts: 72
Gender: Male
Thanks for the help Rupert. You're really helping me make up my mind as I was thinking of changing my system (again). If I were to do it I would go with the bigger pump, bigger standpipe, bigger drain holes for quicker fill or more flow thru and for quicker draining.

The reason I don't want to just add growbeds (as would be the obvious solution) is that I'm trying to keep my system as small as possible. Right now I can't hold too many fish in my 110 gallon FT and the GB is sitting right on top of the FT. If I had to add on I would be taking up more space.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Cleaning grow beds
PostPosted: Sep 5th, '09, 21:55 
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
Seriously, this cant be healthy.
User avatar

Joined: Dec 6th, '07, 01:13
Posts: 10709
Images: 0
Location: central FL
Gender: Female
Are you human?: YES at least mostly
Location: USA, Florida, Yalaha
Lucero808 wrote:
Sorry I forgot to add my question.

On a timed system with a larger pump, larger standpipe, and larger drain holes I could get even more water flowing through my system (higher turnover). Knowing this could I have a smaller growbed than the recommended ratio of 2:1? My thinking is that like a fish tank filter the higher the turnover rate the more water that is being 'processed' by the filter (GB).

The only thing I could see being a problem is that I would be adding too much solids for the GB (and worms) to handle. Do you guys (and ladies) think this is possible? Can I use a smaller GB with a higher flow rate to 'feed' the bacteria more and have a more effecient system.

I ask this because I have a small GB (55 gallons) on a 110 gallon fish tank and I'd like to add more fish without adding more growbeds.


Your stocking density is going to be limited by the amount of bio-filter you have. Increasing flow through will only minimally increase your bio-filter and expecting such an undersized amount of grow bed to support twice it's volume is likely to overload the grow bed with solids and you probably won't have enough plants growing to pull out enough of the nitrates. If you stock heavily for the size of the fish tank, you will likely be teetering on disaster. You might manage more fish by adding additional alternative types of filters and removing solids but you will be increasing complexity in order to do it.

If you are wanting to stock a 110 gallon tank heavily, then you actually want 4 of those 55 gallon grow beds and a sump tank to do it the flood and drain grow bed way. Currently you are running 1:2 while max stocking wants 2:1
grow bed:fish tank.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC + 8 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Portal by phpBB3 Portal © phpBB Türkiye
[ Time : 0.162s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]